A Novel Approach for Engagement in Team Training in High-Technology Surgery: The Robotic-Assisted Surgery Olympics.
Journal
Journal of patient safety
ISSN: 1549-8425
Titre abrégé: J Patient Saf
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101233393
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2022
01 09 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
8
7
2022
medline:
24
8
2022
entrez:
7
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is ongoing interest in the development of technical and nontechnical skills in healthcare to improve safety and efficiency; however, barriers to developing and delivering related training programs make them difficult to implement. Unique approaches to training such as "serious games" may offer ways to motivate teams, reinforce skill acquisition, and promote teamwork. Given increased challenges to teamwork in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS), researchers aimed to develop the "RAS Olympics," a game-based educational competition to improve skills needed to successfully perform RAS. This pilot study was conducted at an academic medical center in Southern California. Robotic-assisted surgery staff were invited to participate in the "RAS Olympics" to develop their skills and identify opportunities to improve processes. Impact of the activity was assessed using surveys and debriefs. Sixteen operating room team members participated and reacted favorably toward the RAS-Olympics (average score, 4.5/5). They enjoyed the activity, would recommend all staff participate, felt that it was relevant to their work, and believed that they practiced and learned new techniques that would improve their practice. Confidence in skills remained unchanged. Participants preferred the RAS Olympics to traditional training because it provided an interactive learning environment. The successful implementation of the RAS Olympics provided insight into new opportunities to engage surgical staff members while also training technical and nontechnical skills. Furthermore, this shared experience allowed surgical staff members to gain a greater appreciation for their teammates and an understanding of the current challenges and methods to improve teamwork and communication while promoting safety and efficiency in RAS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35797490
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001056
pii: 01209203-202209000-00010
pmc: PMC9391262
mid: NIHMS1815345
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
570-577Subventions
Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : R01 HS026491
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors disclose no conflict of interest.
Références
Rouse WB. Health care as a complex adaptive system: implications for design and management. Bridge-Washington-National Acad Eng . 2008;38:17–25.
Holden RJ, Carayon P, Gurses AP, et al. SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics . 2013;56:1669–1686.
Carayon P, Wooldridge A, Hoonakker P, et al. SEIPS 3.0: human-centered design of the patient journey for patient safety. Appl Ergon . 2020;84:103033–103033.
Collins JW, Dell’Oglio P, Hung AJ, et al. The importance of technical and non-technical skills in robotic surgery training. Eur Urol Focus . 2018;4:674–676.
Kalantari R, Zamanian Z, Hasanshahi M, et al. The effect of educational intervention on the improvement of nontechnical skills in circulating nurses. Biomed Res Int . 2021;2021:5856730.
Lynch A. Simulation-based acquisition of non-technical skills to improve patient safety. Semin Pediatr Surg . 2020;29:150906.
Griffin C, Aydın A, Brunckhorst O, et al. Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology. World J Urol . 2020;38:1653–1661.
Flin R, Maran N. Identifying and training non-technical skills for teams in acute medicine. Qual Saf Health Care . 2004;13(suppl 1):i80–i84.
Cerfolio RJ, Ferrari-Light D, Ren-Fielding C, et al. Improving operating room turnover time in a New York City academic hospital via lean. Ann Thorac Surg . 2019;107:1011–1016.
Boet S, Bould MD, Layat Burn C, et al. Twelve tips for a successful interprofessional team-based high-fidelity simulation education session. Med Teach . 2014;36:853–857.
Camilleri J, Cope V, Murray M. Change fatigue: the frontline nursing experience of large-scale organisational change and the influence of teamwork. J Nurs Manag . 2019;27:655–660.
Musson DM, Helmreich RL. Team training and resource management in health care: current issues and future directions. Harvard Health Policy Rev . 2004;5:25–35.
Antai-Otong D. Team building in a health care setting. Am J Nurs . 1997;97:48–51.
Beneria A, Arnedo M, Contreras S, et al. Impact of simulation-based teamwork training on COVID-19 distress in healthcare professionals. BMC Med Educ . 2020;20:515.
Rydenfält C, Odenrick P, Larsson PA. Organizing for teamwork in healthcare: an alternative to team training? J Health Organ Manag . 2017;31:347–362.
Morey JC, Salisbury M. Introducing teamwork training into healthcare organizations: implementation issues and solutions. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Ann Meeting . 2002;46:2069–2073.
Terhune KP, Shelton J, Koller F. Surgical intern Olympics: skills assessment. Med Educ . 2009;43:1104–1105.
Rebel A, DiLorenzo A, Fragneto RY, et al. Objective assessment of anesthesiology resident skills using an innovative competition-based simulation approach. A A Case Rep . 2015;5:79–87.
Olgers TJ, Bij de Weg AA, Ter Maaten JC. Serious games for improving technical skills in medicine: scoping review. JMIR Serious Games . 2021;9:e24093.
Gorbanev I, Agudelo-Londoño S, González RA, et al. A systematic review of serious games in medical education: quality of evidence and pedagogical strategy. Med Educ Online . 2018;23:1438718.
Ghoman SK, Patel SD, Cutumisu M, et al. Serious games, a game changer in teaching neonatal resuscitation? A review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed . 2020;105:98–107.
van Gaalen AEJ, Brouwer J, Schönrock-Adema J, et al. Gamification of health professions education: a systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ . 2021;26:683–711.
Nicholson S. Peeking behind the locked door: a survey of escape room facilities. White paper; 2015. Available at: https://scottnicholson.com/pubs/erfacwhite.pdf . Accessed January 3, 2022.
Anderson M, Lioce LM, Robertson JO, et al. Toward defining healthcare simulation escape rooms. Simul Gaming . 2020;1046878120958745.
Cohen TN, Griggs AC, Kanji FF, et al. Advancing team cohesion: using an escape room as a novel approach. J Pat Saf Risk Manag . 2021;26:126–134.
Cohen TN, Griggs AC, Keebler JR, et al. Using escape rooms for conducting team research: understanding development, considerations, and challenges. Simul Gaming . 2020;51:443–460.
Guckian J, Eveson L, May H. The great escape? The rise of the escape room in medical education. Future Healthc J . 2020;7:112–115.
Catchpole KR, Hallett E, Curtis S, et al. Diagnosing barriers to safety and efficiency in robotic surgery. Ergonomics . 2018;61:26–39.
Weigl M, Weber J, Hallett E, et al. Associations of intraoperative flow disruptions and operating room teamwork during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology . 2018;114:105–113.
Weber J, Catchpole K, Becker AJ, et al. Effects of flow disruptions on mental workload and surgical performance in robotic-assisted surgery. World J Surg . 2018;42:3599–3607.
Souders CP, Catchpole K, Hannemann A, et al. Flow disruptions in robotic-assisted abdominal sacrocolpopexy: does robotic surgery introduce unforeseen challenges for gynecologic surgeons? Int Urogynecol J . 2019;30:2177–2182.
Dru CJ, Anger JT, Souders CP, et al. Surgical flow disruptions during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Can J Urol . 2017;24:8814–8821.
Hertz P, Houlind K, Jepsen J, et al. Identifying curriculum content for a cross-specialty robotic-assisted surgery training program: a Delphi study. Surg Endosc . 2021;36:4786–4794.
Alfred MC, Cohen TN, Cohen KA, et al. Using flow disruptions to examine system safety in robotic-assisted surgery: protocol for a stepped wedge crossover design. JMIR Res Protoc . 2021;10:e25284.
Cofran L, Cohen T, Alfred M, et al. Barriers to safety and efficiency in robotic surgery docking. Surg Endosc . 2022;36:206–215.
Kanji F, Cohen T, Alfred M, et al. Room size influences flow in robotic-assisted surgery. Int J Environ Res Public Health . 2021;18:7984.
Raison N, Wood T, Brunckhorst O, et al. Development and validation of a tool for non-technical skills evaluation in robotic surgery—the ICARS system. Surg Endosc . 2017;31:5403–5410.
Schreyer J, Koch A, Herlemann A, et al. RAS-NOTECHS: validity and reliability of a tool for measuring non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery settings. Surg Endosc . 2022;36:1916–1926.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform . 2009;42:377–381.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform . 2019;95:103208.
Pelaccia T, Viau R. Motivation in medical education. Med Teach . 2017;39:136–140.
Padgett J, Cristancho S, Lingard L, et al. Engagement: what is it good for? The role of learner engagement in healthcare simulation contexts. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract . 2019;24:811–825.
Karl KA, Peluchette JV, Hall L. Give them something to smile about: A marketing-oriented approach to volunteer recruitment and retention. J Nonprofit Public Sect Mark . 2008;20:71–96.
Plester B, Hutchison A. Fun times: the relationship between fun and workplace engagement. Empl Relat . 2016;38:332–350.
Müceldili B, Erdil O. Finding fun in work: the effect of workplace fun on taking charge and job engagement. Procedia Soc Behav Sci . 2016;235:304–312.
Kahn WA. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad Manage J . 1990;33:692–724.
Blok AC, Anderson E, Swamy L, et al. Comparing nurse leader and manager perceptions of and strategies for nurse engagement using a positive deviance approach: a qualitative analysis. J Nurs Manag . 2021;29:1476–1485.
Cohen GL, Sherman DK. The psychology of change: self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annu Rev Psychol . 2014;65:333–371.
Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA, et al. Patient safety in surgery. Ann Surg . 2006;243:628–635.
Scales CD Jr., Moin T, Fink A, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of team-based competition to increase learner participation in quality-improvement education. International J Qual Health Care . 2016;28:227–232.
Nevin CR, Westfall AO, Rodriguez JM, et al. Gamification as a tool for enhancing graduate medical education. Postgrad Med J . 2014;90:685–693.
Yu F-Y, Han C, Chan T-W. Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and anonymous real-time team competition in a networked gaming learning environment. Cyberpsychol Behav . 2008;11:511–514.
Mishra A, Catchpole K, McCulloch P. The Oxford NOTECHS system: reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre. BMJ Qual Saf . 2009;18:104–108.