Continuation of fluoropyrimidine treatment with S-1 after cardiotoxicity on capecitabine- or 5-fluorouracil-based therapy in patients with solid tumours: a multicentre retrospective observational cohort study.


Journal

ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2022
Historique:
received: 13 10 2021
revised: 23 11 2021
accepted: 18 12 2021
entrez: 7 7 2022
pubmed: 8 7 2022
medline: 12 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Capecitabine- or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is widely used in many solid tumours, but is associated with cardiotoxicity. S-1 is a fluoropyrimidine with low rates of cardiotoxicity, but evidence regarding the safety of switching to S-1 after 5-FU- or capecitabine-associated cardiotoxicity is scarce. This retrospective study (NCT04260269) was conducted at 13 centres in 6 countries. The primary endpoint was recurrence of cardiotoxicity after switch to S-1-based treatment due to 5-FU- or capecitabine-related cardiotoxicity: clinically meaningful if the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval (CI; by competing risk) is not including 15%. Secondary endpoints included cardiac risk factors, diagnostic work-up, treatments, outcomes, and timelines of cardiotoxicity. Per protocol, 200 patients, treated between 2011 and 2020 [median age 66 years (range 19-86); 118 (59%) males], were included. Treatment intent was curative in 145 (73%). Initial cardiotoxicity was due to capecitabine (n = 170), continuous infusion 5-FU (n = 22), or bolus 5-FU (n = 8), which was administered in combination with other chemotherapy, targeted agents, or radiotherapy in 133 patients. Previous cardiovascular comorbidities were present in 99 (50%) patients. Cardiotoxic events (n = 228/200) included chest pain (n = 125), coronary syndrome/infarction (n = 69), arrhythmia (n = 22), heart failure/cardiomyopathy (n = 7), cardiac arrest (n = 4), and malignant hypertension (n = 1). Cardiotoxicity was severe or life-threatening in 112 (56%) patients and led to permanent capecitabine/5-FU discontinuation in 192 (96%). After switch to S-1, recurrent cardiotoxicity was observed in eight (4%) patients (95% CI 2.02-7.89, primary endpoint met). Events were limited to grade 1-2 and occurred at a median of 16 days (interquartile range 7-67) from therapy switch. Baseline ischemic heart disease was a risk factor for recurrent cardiotoxicity (odds ratio 6.18, 95% CI 1.36-28.11). Switching to S-1-based therapy is safe and feasible after development of cardiotoxicity on 5-FU- or capecitabine-based therapy and allows patients to continue their pivotal fluoropyrimidine-based treatment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Capecitabine- or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is widely used in many solid tumours, but is associated with cardiotoxicity. S-1 is a fluoropyrimidine with low rates of cardiotoxicity, but evidence regarding the safety of switching to S-1 after 5-FU- or capecitabine-associated cardiotoxicity is scarce.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This retrospective study (NCT04260269) was conducted at 13 centres in 6 countries. The primary endpoint was recurrence of cardiotoxicity after switch to S-1-based treatment due to 5-FU- or capecitabine-related cardiotoxicity: clinically meaningful if the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval (CI; by competing risk) is not including 15%. Secondary endpoints included cardiac risk factors, diagnostic work-up, treatments, outcomes, and timelines of cardiotoxicity.
RESULTS
Per protocol, 200 patients, treated between 2011 and 2020 [median age 66 years (range 19-86); 118 (59%) males], were included. Treatment intent was curative in 145 (73%). Initial cardiotoxicity was due to capecitabine (n = 170), continuous infusion 5-FU (n = 22), or bolus 5-FU (n = 8), which was administered in combination with other chemotherapy, targeted agents, or radiotherapy in 133 patients. Previous cardiovascular comorbidities were present in 99 (50%) patients. Cardiotoxic events (n = 228/200) included chest pain (n = 125), coronary syndrome/infarction (n = 69), arrhythmia (n = 22), heart failure/cardiomyopathy (n = 7), cardiac arrest (n = 4), and malignant hypertension (n = 1). Cardiotoxicity was severe or life-threatening in 112 (56%) patients and led to permanent capecitabine/5-FU discontinuation in 192 (96%). After switch to S-1, recurrent cardiotoxicity was observed in eight (4%) patients (95% CI 2.02-7.89, primary endpoint met). Events were limited to grade 1-2 and occurred at a median of 16 days (interquartile range 7-67) from therapy switch. Baseline ischemic heart disease was a risk factor for recurrent cardiotoxicity (odds ratio 6.18, 95% CI 1.36-28.11).
CONCLUSION
Switching to S-1-based therapy is safe and feasible after development of cardiotoxicity on 5-FU- or capecitabine-based therapy and allows patients to continue their pivotal fluoropyrimidine-based treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35798468
pii: S2059-7029(22)00048-5
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100427
pmc: PMC9291631
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Capecitabine 6804DJ8Z9U
Fluorouracil U3P01618RT

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04260269']

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Observational Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100427

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure PO, SK, PP, TS, JJMK, JEF, CHS, HS, RR, PH, LMS, EH, AÅ, MB, HH, RMD, MOR, RR, GL, RK, PF, AJK, EvW, CJAP, and BG report grants, personal fees, or non-financial support from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Clovis Oncology, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Erytech Pharma, Fresenius, Incyte, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nordic Drugs, Nordic Pharma, Nordic Group, Nutricia, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Sobi, or Varian. Data sharing The data collected for this study can be made available to others in de-identified form after all primary and secondary endpoints have been published, in the presence of a data transfer agreement, and if the purpose of use complies with Finnish and European legislation. Requests for data sharing can be made to the corresponding author, including a proposal that must be approved by the steering committee.

Références

BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 19;6(10):e012798
pubmed: 27798021
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 20;28(9):1547-53
pubmed: 20159816
Ann Oncol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1291-1305
pubmed: 32702383
JACC CardioOncol. 2020 Nov 17;2(4):650-654
pubmed: 34396276
Eur J Cancer. 2017 May;76:93-99
pubmed: 28286287
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Aug;81:130-134
pubmed: 28623776
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019 Mar;18(1):52-57
pubmed: 30396850
Acta Oncol. 2020 Apr;59(4):475-483
pubmed: 31931649
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Mar;109(3):591-604
pubmed: 33020924
JACC CardioOncol. 2021 Mar;3(1):101-109
pubmed: 33817666
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;4(5):376-388
pubmed: 30852136
Lancet. 2002 May 4;359(9317):1555-63
pubmed: 12047964
Oncologist. 2021 Mar;26(3):e403-e413
pubmed: 32959474
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2014 Sep 04;15:47
pubmed: 25186061
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2013 Mar;12(1):8-14
pubmed: 23102544
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan;134(1):75-82
pubmed: 17636329
Ann Oncol. 2014 Jan;25(1):117-21
pubmed: 24299960
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006 Oct;58(4):487-93
pubmed: 16418875
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 2;7(1):7142
pubmed: 28769123
Cardiol Clin. 2019 Nov;37(4):399-405
pubmed: 31587781
Br J Surg. 2021 Jul 23;108(7):817-825
pubmed: 33749772
Ann Oncol. 1996 Nov;7(9):961-5
pubmed: 9006748
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 01;28(6):1288-1293
pubmed: 28383633
Cancer Treat Rev. 2013 Dec;39(8):974-84
pubmed: 23582737
In Vivo. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(4):531-4
pubmed: 23812226
Ann Oncol. 2016 Aug;27(8):1386-422
pubmed: 27380959
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 20;28(36):5280-6
pubmed: 21079148
Ann Oncol. 2002 Sep;13(9):1424-9
pubmed: 12196368
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Jan 29;3:100049
pubmed: 34557799
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 16;53(24):2231-47
pubmed: 19520246
Cardiol J. 2012;19(5):453-8
pubmed: 23042307
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Jan;69(1):57-64
pubmed: 21603868

Auteurs

P Osterlund (P)

Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: pia.osterlund@helsinki.fi.

S Kinos (S)

Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.

P Pfeiffer (P)

Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

T Salminen (T)

Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.

J J M Kwakman (JJM)

Department of Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

J-E Frödin (JE)

Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

C H Shah (CH)

Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

H Sorbye (H)

Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital and Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

R Ristamäki (R)

Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

P Halonen (P)

Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

L M Soveri (LM)

Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

E Heervä (E)

Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

A Ålgars (A)

Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

M Bärlund (M)

Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.

H Hagman (H)

Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

R McDermott (R)

Department of Oncology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

M O'Reilly (M)

Department of Oncology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

R Röckert (R)

Department of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

G Liposits (G)

Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark.

R Kallio (R)

Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Oncology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.

P Flygare (P)

Department of Oncology, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Sweden.

A J Teske (AJ)

Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

E van Werkhoven (E)

Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

C J A Punt (CJA)

Department of Epidemiology, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

B Glimelius (B)

Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH