The impact of resistance exercise range of motion on the magnitude of upper-body post-activation performance enhancement.
Bench press
Bench press throw
Conditioning activity
PAP
PAPE
Post-activation potentiation
Journal
BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation
ISSN: 2052-1847
Titre abrégé: BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101605016
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Jul 2022
07 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
06
02
2022
accepted:
01
07
2022
entrez:
7
7
2022
pubmed:
8
7
2022
medline:
8
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Various studies have used different exercise protocols as post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) stimulus; however, little attention has been given to the effects of exercise range of motion on the PAPE effect and subsequent performance enhancement. This study aimed to compare the PAPE responses induced by the bench press performed with different ranges of motion on subsequent bench press throw performance. Ten resistance-trained males (age: 26 ± 3 years; body mass: 93.2 ± 9.4 kg; height: 181 ± 6 cm; experience in resistance training: 6.3 ± 2.4 years; relative bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM) 1.54 ± 0.2 kg/body mass) performed four experimental sessions consisting of a single set of the bench press at 80%1RM until mean barbell velocity dropped by 10% as the conditioning activity (CA) with a (1) standard, (2) cambered, (3) and reversed cambered barbell or a control condition in which the participants did not perform any CA. To assess the PAPE effect, single-sets of 2 repetitions of the bench press throw at 30%1RM were performed before and after the CA at the following time points: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 min. The two-way ANOVA (4 conditions × 2time points) showed a significant interaction for peak power (p < 0.001; η The results of this study indicate that the range of motion of the CA has a significant impact on the magnitude of the PAPE response, and the greatest effect can be reached when the range of motion of the CA and the subsequent explosive task is similar.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Various studies have used different exercise protocols as post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) stimulus; however, little attention has been given to the effects of exercise range of motion on the PAPE effect and subsequent performance enhancement. This study aimed to compare the PAPE responses induced by the bench press performed with different ranges of motion on subsequent bench press throw performance.
METHODS
METHODS
Ten resistance-trained males (age: 26 ± 3 years; body mass: 93.2 ± 9.4 kg; height: 181 ± 6 cm; experience in resistance training: 6.3 ± 2.4 years; relative bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM) 1.54 ± 0.2 kg/body mass) performed four experimental sessions consisting of a single set of the bench press at 80%1RM until mean barbell velocity dropped by 10% as the conditioning activity (CA) with a (1) standard, (2) cambered, (3) and reversed cambered barbell or a control condition in which the participants did not perform any CA. To assess the PAPE effect, single-sets of 2 repetitions of the bench press throw at 30%1RM were performed before and after the CA at the following time points: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 min.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The two-way ANOVA (4 conditions × 2time points) showed a significant interaction for peak power (p < 0.001; η
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study indicate that the range of motion of the CA has a significant impact on the magnitude of the PAPE response, and the greatest effect can be reached when the range of motion of the CA and the subsequent explosive task is similar.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35799185
doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00519-w
pii: 10.1186/s13102-022-00519-w
pmc: PMC9264649
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
123Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Front Physiol. 2019 Nov 01;10:1359
pubmed: 31736781
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Jul;12(6):736-741
pubmed: 27736266
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Mar;27(3):854-9
pubmed: 22580978
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Mar 31;72:151-159
pubmed: 32269656
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Apr;33(4):995-1000
pubmed: 29309389
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Nov;27(11):2997-3000
pubmed: 23442291
J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Nov;21(4):1134-8
pubmed: 18076243
Exp Neurol. 1983 Jul;81(1):141-52
pubmed: 6861942
J Hum Kinet. 2019 Aug 21;68:81-98
pubmed: 31531135
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Aug 18;:
pubmed: 32826834
J Hum Kinet. 2016 Sep 10;52:95-106
pubmed: 28149397
Front Physiol. 2020 Oct 20;11:577400
pubmed: 33192580
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 21;11(1):14847
pubmed: 34290302
Front Physiol. 2020 Jul 16;11:875
pubmed: 32765305
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Aug 31;74:99-108
pubmed: 33312279
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1997 Dec;83(6):2131-8
pubmed: 9390991
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015 Nov;40(11):1163-70
pubmed: 26466081
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Oct;12(9):1170-1176
pubmed: 28182500
J Sports Sci. 2007 Jan 15;25(2):193-200
pubmed: 17127594
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Feb 1;35(Suppl 2):S72-S79
pubmed: 32398633
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 02;18(21):
pubmed: 34770042
J Sports Sci Med. 2015 Mar 01;14(1):128-36
pubmed: 25729300
Sports Med. 2016 Feb;46(2):231-40
pubmed: 26508319
Sports Med. 2016 Jun;46(6):809-28
pubmed: 26712510
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 08;17(7):
pubmed: 32276452
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 May 01;19(2):317-322
pubmed: 32390725
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222466
pubmed: 31513671
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020 Aug;45(8):817-828
pubmed: 32017598
Front Physiol. 2021 Jan 15;11:598628
pubmed: 33519506
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Jun;88(6):2088-96
pubmed: 10846022
J Sports Sci. 2012;30(6):591-9
pubmed: 22304656
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 06;18(7):
pubmed: 33917433
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(4):333-42
pubmed: 9134365
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Sports Med. 2009;39(2):147-66
pubmed: 19203135
Front Physiol. 2021 Mar 05;12:651659
pubmed: 33746784
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Jun;88(6):2131-7
pubmed: 10846027
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020 Aug 19;15(8):1197-1200
pubmed: 32820135
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Aug;30(8):2250-7
pubmed: 26808841
J Hum Kinet. 2019 Oct 18;69:271-281
pubmed: 31666909
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 7;12(2):e0171632
pubmed: 28170449
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 14;17(14):
pubmed: 32674351
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Feb;52(2):484-489
pubmed: 31425385
J Strength Cond Res. 2006 Aug;20(3):597-600
pubmed: 16937974