Risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia meta-analysis risk factors

Journal

Translational pediatrics
ISSN: 2224-4344
Titre abrégé: Transl Pediatr
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101649179

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 05 05 2022
accepted: 16 06 2022
entrez: 8 7 2022
pubmed: 9 7 2022
medline: 9 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Hyperbilirubinemia is the most common cause of neonatal hospitalization and, although it generally has a good prognosis, a significant percentage of neonatal patients maintain a high bilirubin level, which can lead to severe complications, including lifelong disability such as growth retardation, encephalopathy, autism and hearing impairment. The study of risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia has been controversial. Therefore, we evaluated the risk factors of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia using a meta-analysis. Relevant English and Chinese studies that discussed risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia were retrieved from the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Central, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and China Science Digital Library (CSDL). The literature took newborns as the research object, set up a control group, and observed the relationship between exposure factors and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. The combined effect size was expressed by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The Chi-square test was used to test heterogeneity of the studies, and if it existed, subgroup analyses were used to explore the source of heterogeneity, and the random-effects model was selected for the combined analysis. The fixed-effects model was chosen for the combined analysis if there was no heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plot. Risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia were exclusive breastfeeding (BF: OR =1.74, 95% CI: 1.42, 2.12, Z=5.43, P<0.00001); glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD: OR =1.62, 95% CI: 1.44, 1.81, Z=8.39, P<0.00001); maternal-fetal ABO blood group incompatibility (OR =1.64, 95% CI: 1.42, 1.89, Z=6.75, P<0.00001); and preterm birth (PTB: OR =1.31, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.47, Z=4.60, P<0.00001); there was no heterogeneity or publication bias among the studies (BF: χ Exclusive breastfeeding, G6PD deficiency, ABO incompatibility and premature birth were confirmed as risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pregnant women with risk factors should be monitored more closely and clinical intervention should be given in a timely manner.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Hyperbilirubinemia is the most common cause of neonatal hospitalization and, although it generally has a good prognosis, a significant percentage of neonatal patients maintain a high bilirubin level, which can lead to severe complications, including lifelong disability such as growth retardation, encephalopathy, autism and hearing impairment. The study of risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia has been controversial. Therefore, we evaluated the risk factors of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia using a meta-analysis.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Relevant English and Chinese studies that discussed risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia were retrieved from the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Central, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and China Science Digital Library (CSDL). The literature took newborns as the research object, set up a control group, and observed the relationship between exposure factors and neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. The combined effect size was expressed by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The Chi-square test was used to test heterogeneity of the studies, and if it existed, subgroup analyses were used to explore the source of heterogeneity, and the random-effects model was selected for the combined analysis. The fixed-effects model was chosen for the combined analysis if there was no heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test and funnel plot.
Results UNASSIGNED
Risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia were exclusive breastfeeding (BF: OR =1.74, 95% CI: 1.42, 2.12, Z=5.43, P<0.00001); glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PD: OR =1.62, 95% CI: 1.44, 1.81, Z=8.39, P<0.00001); maternal-fetal ABO blood group incompatibility (OR =1.64, 95% CI: 1.42, 1.89, Z=6.75, P<0.00001); and preterm birth (PTB: OR =1.31, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.47, Z=4.60, P<0.00001); there was no heterogeneity or publication bias among the studies (BF: χ
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Exclusive breastfeeding, G6PD deficiency, ABO incompatibility and premature birth were confirmed as risk factors for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pregnant women with risk factors should be monitored more closely and clinical intervention should be given in a timely manner.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35800274
doi: 10.21037/tp-22-229
pii: tp-11-06-1001
pmc: PMC9253931
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1001-1009

Informations de copyright

2022 Translational Pediatrics. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-22-229/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

Pediatr Neonatol. 2011 Apr;52(2):85-92
pubmed: 21524628
Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;21(5):947-52
pubmed: 1468858
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2009 Mar;38(3):217-24
pubmed: 19347075
Neonatology. 2021;118(3):301-309
pubmed: 33744898
Arch Iran Med. 2020 Feb 01;23(2):128-140
pubmed: 32061076
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Jun 12;18(1):190
pubmed: 29895274
Pediatr Int. 2015 Dec;57(6):1121-5
pubmed: 25929838
Front Pediatr. 2020 May 12;8:177
pubmed: 32478013
CMAJ. 2006 Sep 12;175(6):587-90
pubmed: 16966660
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 7;16(10):e0258127
pubmed: 34618852
BMC Pediatr. 2009 Dec 31;9:82
pubmed: 20043852
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2021 May;32(4):690-701
pubmed: 33475191
Semin Neonatol. 2002 Apr;7(2):135-41
pubmed: 12208098
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Mar;15(3):260-3
pubmed: 23984010
Acta Paediatr. 1998 Apr;87(4):455-7
pubmed: 9628306
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Aug 11;6(8):1387-1393
pubmed: 30159062
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Dec;22(12):1256-1260
pubmed: 33327994
Trop Med Int Health. 2013 Nov;18(11):1317-28
pubmed: 24112359
J Med Assoc Thai. 2017 Mar;100(3):255-61
pubmed: 29911780
Acta Paediatr Scand. 1989 Nov;78(6):848-52
pubmed: 2603709
Med J Malaysia. 2019 Dec;74(6):527-533
pubmed: 31929480
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):6802-6806
pubmed: 34306430
Pediatr Res. 2021 Nov;90(5):934-949
pubmed: 33526883

Auteurs

Qun Lin (Q)

Neonatal Department, Haikou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Haikou, China.

Daomou Zhu (D)

Department of Emergency, Hainan Women and Children's Medical Center, Haikou, China.

Caihua Chen (C)

Neonatal Department, Hainan Women and Children's Medical Center, Haikou, China.

Yonghong Feng (Y)

Neonatal Department, Haikou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Haikou, China.

Fenfen Shen (F)

Department of Nursing, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College Central South University, Haikou, China.

Zhenkui Wu (Z)

Department of Pediatrics, Hainan Modern Women and Children's Hospital, Haikou, China.

Classifications MeSH