The Development and Initial End-Point User Feedback of a 3D-Printed Adult Proximal Tibia IO Simulator.
3d-printing
additive manufacturing
emergency medicine
intraosseous infusion
io
psychomotor skills
simulation-based medical education
simulator
three-dimensional (3d) printing
training
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
received:
16
05
2022
accepted:
30
05
2022
entrez:
8
7
2022
pubmed:
9
7
2022
medline:
9
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Intraosseous infusion (IO) remains an underutilized technique for obtaining vascular access in adults, despite its potentially life-saving benefits in trauma patients. In rural and remote areas, shortage of training equipment and human capacity (i.e., simulators) are the main contributors to the shortage of local training courses aiming at the development and maintenance of IO skills. Specifically, current training equipment options available for trainees include commercially available simulators, which are often expensive, or animal tissues, which lack human anatomical features that are necessary for optimal learning and pose logistical and ethical issues related to practice on live animals. Three-dimensional (3D) printing provides the means to create cost-effective, anatomically correct simulators for practicing IO where existing simulators may be difficult to access, especially in remote areas. This technical report aims to describe the development of maxSIMIO, a 3D-printed adult proximal tibia IO simulator, and present feedback on the design features from a clinical co-design team consisting of 18 end-point users. Overall, the majority of the feedback was positive and highlighted that the maxSIMIO simulator was helpful for learning and developing the IO technique. The majority of the clinical team responders also agreed that the simulator was more anatomically accurate compared to other simulators they have used in the past. Finally, the survey results indicated that on average, the simulator is acceptable as a training tool. Notable suggestions for improvement included increasing the stability of the individual parts of the model (such as tightening the skin and securing the bones), enhancing the anatomical accuracy of the experience (such as adding a fibula), making the bones harder, increasing the size of the patella, making it more modular (to minimize costs related to maintenance), and improving the anatomical positioning of the knee joint (i.e., slightly bent in the knee joint). In summary, the clinical team, located in rural and remote areas in Canada, found the 3D-printed simulator to be a functional tool for practicing the intraosseous technique. The outcome of this report supports the use of this cost-effective simulator for simulation-based medical education for remote and rural areas anywhere in the world.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35800805
doi: 10.7759/cureus.25481
pmc: PMC9246437
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e25481Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022, Sivanathan et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Surgery. 2014 Sep;156(3):718-22
pubmed: 25175506
Cureus. 2021 Mar 23;13(3):e14055
pubmed: 33898139
Crit Care. 2016 Apr 14;20:102
pubmed: 27075364
Resuscitation. 2012 Jan;83(1):40-5
pubmed: 21893125
Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S729-67
pubmed: 20956224
Emerg Med J. 2012 Jun;29(6):506-7
pubmed: 20956390
Cureus. 2020 Dec 20;12(12):e12180
pubmed: 33489591
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018 Jan;4(1):27-40
pubmed: 29354281
Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:100-47
pubmed: 26477701
Cureus. 2021 Oct 16;13(10):e18824
pubmed: 34804681
Cureus. 2015 Nov 02;7(11):e371
pubmed: 26677421