Various types of reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for the patients who underwent all types of gastrectomy: a single-enter experience.

Gastrectomy Pancreaticoduodenectomy Second primary neoplasms

Journal

Annals of surgical treatment and research
ISSN: 2288-6575
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Treat Res
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101622895

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 25 02 2022
revised: 03 04 2022
accepted: 12 04 2022
entrez: 8 7 2022
pubmed: 9 7 2022
medline: 9 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The incidence of patients requiring pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) following any type of gastrectomy is increasing as the population of elderly patients is increasing, especially in endemic areas of gastric cancer such as Korea. All types of gastrectomy can be categorized as subtotal gastrectomy with Billroth I (BI), Billroth II (BII), and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis. In this paper, we reviewed our experiences of PD for patients who previously underwent gastrectomy. We reviewed the medical records of the patients who underwent PD following any type of gastrectomy among 505 consecutive patients who underwent PD in a single institution between 2011 and 2020 retrospectively. There were 13 patients who had undergone gastrectomy including 7 patients of BI, 1 patient of BII, and 5 patients of total gastrectomy. For all 7 patients of BI, the reconstruction was not different from conventional PD. For the 1 patient of BII, previous gastrojejunal anastomosis was preserved and reconstruction was performed in Roux-en-Y method. For the 5 patients with total gastrectomy, 2 different types of reconstruction were performed. In one patient, we removed the remaining jejunum with the specimen, and reconstruction was performed. For the other 4 patients, the remaining jejunum, distal to the Treitz ligament, was preserved and was utilized for anastomosis. Surgeries for all patients were uneventful. PD following any type of gastrectomy can be safe. Especially, if the length of remained jejunum is long enough, its utilization for the reconstruction can be an appropriate option.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35800992
doi: 10.4174/astr.2022.102.6.323
pmc: PMC9204019
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

323-327

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022, the Korean Surgical Society.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Références

Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;35:106-109
pubmed: 28477562
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 May;27(4):659-667
pubmed: 28441249
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2020 Apr;98(4):177-183
pubmed: 32274365
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec 12;2:107
pubmed: 29354764
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 14;20(10):2721-4
pubmed: 24627609
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014;:e57-67
pubmed: 24857148
Int Surg. 2014 Jul-Aug;99(4):426-31
pubmed: 25058778
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;52(2):335-350
pubmed: 32178489
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;30:118-121
pubmed: 28012325
Prz Gastroenterol. 2019;14(1):26-38
pubmed: 30944675

Auteurs

Hyun-Jeong Jeon (HJ)

Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

Hyung-Jun Kwon (HJ)

Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

Yoon-Jin Hwang (YJ)

Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

Sang Geol Kim (SG)

Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea.

Classifications MeSH