Validation of a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score and age-specific risks of prostate cancer: A meta-analysis within diverse populations.
African ancestry
Hispanic
epidemiology
genetics
genomics
global health
health disparities
multi-ancestry
none
polygenic risk scores
prostate cancer
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 07 2022
08 07 2022
Historique:
received:
01
03
2022
accepted:
07
07
2022
pubmed:
9
7
2022
medline:
29
7
2022
entrez:
8
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We recently developed a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score (PRS) that effectively stratifies prostate cancer risk across populations. In this study, we validated the performance of the PRS in the multi-ancestry Million Veteran Program and additional independent studies. Within each ancestry population, the association of PRS with prostate cancer risk was evaluated separately in each case-control study and then combined in a fixed-effects inverse-variance-weighted meta-analysis. We further assessed the effect modification by age and estimated the age-specific absolute risk of prostate cancer for each ancestry population. The PRS was evaluated in 31,925 cases and 490,507 controls, including men from European (22,049 cases, 414,249 controls), African (8794 cases, 55,657 controls), and Hispanic (1082 cases, 20,601 controls) populations. Comparing men in the top decile (90-100% of the PRS) to the average 40-60% PRS category, the prostate cancer odds ratio (OR) was 3.8-fold in European ancestry men (95% CI = 3.62-3.96), 2.8-fold in African ancestry men (95% CI = 2.59-3.03), and 3.2-fold in Hispanic men (95% CI = 2.64-3.92). The PRS did not discriminate risk of aggressive versus nonaggressive prostate cancer. However, the OR diminished with advancing age (European ancestry men in the top decile: ≤55 years, OR = 7.11; 55-60 years, OR = 4.26; >70 years, OR = 2.79). Men in the top PRS decile reached 5% absolute prostate cancer risk ~10 years younger than men in the 40-60% PRS category. Our findings validate the multi-ancestry PRS as an effective prostate cancer risk stratification tool across populations. A clinical study of PRS is warranted to determine whether the PRS could be used for risk-stratified screening and early detection. This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers U19 CA214253 to C.A.H., U01 CA257328 to C.A.H., U19 CA148537 to C.A.H., R01 CA165862 to C.A.H., K99 CA246063 to B.F.D, and T32CA229110 to F.C), the Prostate Cancer Foundation (grants 21YOUN11 to B.F.D. and 20CHAS03 to C.A.H.), the Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation Los Angeles Founder Chapter to B.F.D, and the Million Veteran Program-MVP017. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under application number 42195. This research is based on data from the Million Veteran Program, Office of Research and Development, and the Veterans Health Administration. This publication does not represent the views of the Department of Veteran Affairs or the United States Government.
Sections du résumé
Background
We recently developed a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score (PRS) that effectively stratifies prostate cancer risk across populations. In this study, we validated the performance of the PRS in the multi-ancestry Million Veteran Program and additional independent studies.
Methods
Within each ancestry population, the association of PRS with prostate cancer risk was evaluated separately in each case-control study and then combined in a fixed-effects inverse-variance-weighted meta-analysis. We further assessed the effect modification by age and estimated the age-specific absolute risk of prostate cancer for each ancestry population.
Results
The PRS was evaluated in 31,925 cases and 490,507 controls, including men from European (22,049 cases, 414,249 controls), African (8794 cases, 55,657 controls), and Hispanic (1082 cases, 20,601 controls) populations. Comparing men in the top decile (90-100% of the PRS) to the average 40-60% PRS category, the prostate cancer odds ratio (OR) was 3.8-fold in European ancestry men (95% CI = 3.62-3.96), 2.8-fold in African ancestry men (95% CI = 2.59-3.03), and 3.2-fold in Hispanic men (95% CI = 2.64-3.92). The PRS did not discriminate risk of aggressive versus nonaggressive prostate cancer. However, the OR diminished with advancing age (European ancestry men in the top decile: ≤55 years, OR = 7.11; 55-60 years, OR = 4.26; >70 years, OR = 2.79). Men in the top PRS decile reached 5% absolute prostate cancer risk ~10 years younger than men in the 40-60% PRS category.
Conclusions
Our findings validate the multi-ancestry PRS as an effective prostate cancer risk stratification tool across populations. A clinical study of PRS is warranted to determine whether the PRS could be used for risk-stratified screening and early detection.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers U19 CA214253 to C.A.H., U01 CA257328 to C.A.H., U19 CA148537 to C.A.H., R01 CA165862 to C.A.H., K99 CA246063 to B.F.D, and T32CA229110 to F.C), the Prostate Cancer Foundation (grants 21YOUN11 to B.F.D. and 20CHAS03 to C.A.H.), the Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation Los Angeles Founder Chapter to B.F.D, and the Million Veteran Program-MVP017. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under application number 42195. This research is based on data from the Million Veteran Program, Office of Research and Development, and the Veterans Health Administration. This publication does not represent the views of the Department of Veteran Affairs or the United States Government.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35801699
doi: 10.7554/eLife.78304
pii: 78304
pmc: PMC9322982
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_17228
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA229110
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA165862
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U19 CA214253
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA261339
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U19 CA148537
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R00 CA246063
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_QA137853
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA257328
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K99 CA246063
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
FC, AR, XS, CR, CA, WT, AK, AP, KC, MJ, SG, LN, OO, OP, AA, OA, HA, MJ, OO, MN, BA, SM, AD, JM, AA, HD, JL, TR, SA, JG, AJ, DC, CH No competing interests declared, BD received honorarium for presentations at Society of Urology Oncology Annual Meeting (2021) and the Social Genomics Group at the University of Wisconsin, Madison (2021). The author has no other competing interests to declare, RM has stock or stock options in Navipoint Genomics LLC. The author has no other competing interests to declare
Références
JAMA. 2016 Jan 5;315(1):68-76
pubmed: 26746459
Genet Med. 2015 Oct;17(10):789-95
pubmed: 25569441
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):549-557
pubmed: 32273609
Nat Genet. 2021 Jan;53(1):65-75
pubmed: 33398198
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 20;16(12):e1002998
pubmed: 31860675
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Feb 02;19(2):134-143
pubmed: 33545689
Br J Cancer. 2015 Sep 29;113(7):1086-93
pubmed: 26291059
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74
pubmed: 26432245
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Oct 3;105(4):763-772
pubmed: 31564439
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jun;26(6):845-853
pubmed: 28292923
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 May 9;114(5):771-774
pubmed: 33792693
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jul;24(7):1121-9
pubmed: 25837820
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Jul 1;109(7):
pubmed: 28376175
J Glob Oncol. 2018 Sep;4:1-14
pubmed: 30260755
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 27;11(1):6084
pubmed: 33247094
Cancer Res. 2020 Jul 1;80(13):2956-2966
pubmed: 32393663
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Mar 1;112(3):278-285
pubmed: 31165158
Cancer Res. 2010 Dec 1;70(23):9742-54
pubmed: 21118973
Genet Epidemiol. 2001 Jul;21(1):1-18
pubmed: 11443730
Int J Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;146(3):627-634
pubmed: 30868574
Am J Hum Genet. 2020 Apr 2;106(4):535-548
pubmed: 32243820
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;70:214-23
pubmed: 26441289