Continuous-Time Modeling of the Bidirectional Relationship Between Incidental Affect and Physical Activity.
Continuous-time
Dynamic
Incidental affect
Physical activity
Journal
Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine
ISSN: 1532-4796
Titre abrégé: Ann Behav Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8510246
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 11 2022
18 11 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
9
7
2022
medline:
22
11
2022
entrez:
8
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Previous research suggests that there is a bidirectional relationship between incidental affect (i.e., how people feel in day-to-day life) and physical activity behavior. However, many inconsistencies exist in the body of work due to the lag interval between affect and physical activity measurements. Using a novel continuous-time analysis paradigm, we examined the temporal specificity underlying the dynamic relationship between positive and negative incidental affective states and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). A community sample of adults (n = 126, Mage = 27.71, 51.6% Male) completed a 14-day ambulatory assessment protocol measuring momentary positive and negative incidental affect six times a day while wearing a physical activity monitor (Fitbit). Hierarchical Bayesian continuous-time structural equation modeling was used to elucidate the underlying dynamics of the relationship between incidental affective states and MVPA. Based on the continuous-time cross-effects, positive and negative incidental affect predicted subsequent MVPA. Furthermore, engaging in MVPA predicted subsequent positive and negative incidental affect. Incidental affective states had a greater relative influence on predicting subsequent MVPA compared to the reciprocal relationship. Analysis of the discrete-time coefficients suggests that cross-lagged effects increase as the time interval between measurements increase, peaking at about 8 h between measurement occasions before beginning to dissipate. The results provide support for a recursive relationship between incidental affective states and MVPA, which is particularly strong at 7-9 hr time intervals. Future research designs should consider these medium-term dynamics, for both theory development and intervention.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Previous research suggests that there is a bidirectional relationship between incidental affect (i.e., how people feel in day-to-day life) and physical activity behavior. However, many inconsistencies exist in the body of work due to the lag interval between affect and physical activity measurements.
PURPOSE
Using a novel continuous-time analysis paradigm, we examined the temporal specificity underlying the dynamic relationship between positive and negative incidental affective states and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).
METHODS
A community sample of adults (n = 126, Mage = 27.71, 51.6% Male) completed a 14-day ambulatory assessment protocol measuring momentary positive and negative incidental affect six times a day while wearing a physical activity monitor (Fitbit). Hierarchical Bayesian continuous-time structural equation modeling was used to elucidate the underlying dynamics of the relationship between incidental affective states and MVPA.
RESULTS
Based on the continuous-time cross-effects, positive and negative incidental affect predicted subsequent MVPA. Furthermore, engaging in MVPA predicted subsequent positive and negative incidental affect. Incidental affective states had a greater relative influence on predicting subsequent MVPA compared to the reciprocal relationship. Analysis of the discrete-time coefficients suggests that cross-lagged effects increase as the time interval between measurements increase, peaking at about 8 h between measurement occasions before beginning to dissipate.
CONCLUSIONS
The results provide support for a recursive relationship between incidental affective states and MVPA, which is particularly strong at 7-9 hr time intervals. Future research designs should consider these medium-term dynamics, for both theory development and intervention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35802004
pii: 6633985
doi: 10.1093/abm/kaac024
pmc: PMC9672348
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1284-1299Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : L30 MH101760
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001857
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© Society of Behavioral Medicine 2022. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):774-799
pubmed: 29595295
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Dec;107:525-539
pubmed: 31586447
Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(3):366-78
pubmed: 25739893
Psychol Methods. 2019 Aug;24(4):516-537
pubmed: 31008622
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Jul;32(7):917-29
pubmed: 16738025
Ann Behav Med. 2018 May 18;52(6):446-462
pubmed: 27663578
Psychol Health. 2018 Jan;33(1):130-143
pubmed: 28665227
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(2):315-333
pubmed: 30672069
Psychol Health. 2017 Aug;32(8):942-975
pubmed: 28554222
J Psychol. 2019;153(1):102-125
pubmed: 30321106
J Behav Med. 2017 Apr;40(2):307-319
pubmed: 27544393
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021 May 14;11(5):
pubmed: 34068961
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 01;11:568331
pubmed: 33335497
Psychol Health. 2019 Nov;34(11):1267-1281
pubmed: 31617431
J Behav Med. 2019 Jun;42(3):545-560
pubmed: 30600403
Am J Prev Med. 2017 May;52(5):653-666
pubmed: 28153647
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 20;8:1849
pubmed: 29104554
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Dec;32(12):2087-92
pubmed: 11128856
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:505-28
pubmed: 16318605
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 23;6:1975
pubmed: 26779049
J Behav Med. 2017 Jun;40(3):445-457
pubmed: 27766481
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Feb 6;18(1):25
pubmed: 33549100
Psychometrika. 2022 Mar;87(1):214-252
pubmed: 34165691
J Pers Disord. 2007 Apr;21(2):179-98
pubmed: 17492920
Psychol Health. 2021 Apr;36(4):444-460
pubmed: 32538212
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2017 Sep 13;3(1):e000254
pubmed: 29018543
Psychol Methods. 2015 Mar;20(1):102-16
pubmed: 25822208
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70
pubmed: 3397865
Psychol Health. 2017 May;32(5):588-604
pubmed: 28276736
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jan 1;12(1):1-23
pubmed: 27798257
Ann Behav Med. 2020 Mar 24;54(4):268-279
pubmed: 31613961
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2019 Jul;11(2):173-186
pubmed: 30972951
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;16(4):756-766
pubmed: 33593167
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Nov-Dec;53(6):782-805
pubmed: 30668172
Int J Behav Med. 2017 Aug;24(4):513-519
pubmed: 28008556
Psychol Assess. 2019 Jul;31(7):952-960
pubmed: 30958026
Brain Sci. 2013 Jan 11;3(1):39-53
pubmed: 24961306
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):145-72
pubmed: 12529060
Psychol Health. 2018 Jan;33(1):77-97
pubmed: 28498722
JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):2020-2028
pubmed: 30418471
Psychosom Med. 2012 May;74(4):377-86
pubmed: 22582335
Prev Sci. 2019 Jan;20(1):110-114
pubmed: 30673920
J Abnorm Psychol. 2021 Nov;130(8):815-828
pubmed: 34843288
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 07;7:1540
pubmed: 27774077
JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):639-640
pubmed: 29852046
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 21;7:1414
pubmed: 27708602
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Oct;6(10):e1077-e1086
pubmed: 30193830
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Jul 21;137:110191
pubmed: 32739633
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Dec;25 Suppl 3:1-72
pubmed: 26606383