Primary aim results of a clustered SMART for developing a school-level, adaptive implementation strategy to support CBT delivery at high schools in Michigan.
Adaptive implementation strategies
Adolescent mental health
Coaching
Cognitive behavioral therapy
Facilitation
Mental health
Schools
Journal
Implementation science : IS
ISSN: 1748-5908
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101258411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 07 2022
08 07 2022
Historique:
received:
22
11
2021
accepted:
11
05
2022
entrez:
8
7
2022
pubmed:
9
7
2022
medline:
14
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Schools increasingly provide mental health services to students, but often lack access to implementation strategies to support school-based (and school professional [SP]) delivery of evidence-based practices. Given substantial heterogeneity in implementation barriers across schools, development of adaptive implementation strategies that guide which implementation strategies to provide to which schools and when may be necessary to support scale-up. A clustered, sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART) of high schools across Michigan was used to inform the development of a school-level adaptive implementation strategy for supporting SP-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). All schools were first provided with implementation support informed by Replicating Effective Programs (REP) and then were randomized to add in-person Coaching or not (phase 1). After 8 weeks, schools were assessed for response based on SP-reported frequency of CBT delivered to students and/or barriers reported. Responder schools continued with phase 1 implementation strategies. Slower-responder schools (not providing ≥ 3 CBT components to ≥10 students or >2 organizational barriers identified) were re-randomized to add Facilitation to current support or not (phase 2). The primary aim hypothesis was that SPs at schools receiving the REP + Coaching + Facilitation adaptive implementation strategy would deliver more CBT sessions than SPs at schools receiving REP alone. Secondary aims compared four implementation strategies (Coaching vs no Coaching × Facilitation vs no Facilitation) on CBT sessions delivered, including by type (group, brief and full individual). Analyses used a marginal, weighted least squares approach developed for clustered SMARTs. SPs (n = 169) at 94 high schools entered the study. N = 83 schools (88%) were slower-responders after phase 1. Contrary to the primary aim hypothesis, there was no evidence of a significant difference in CBT sessions delivered between REP + Coaching + Facilitation and REP alone (111.4 vs. 121.1 average total CBT sessions; p = 0.63). In secondary analyses, the adaptive strategy that offered REP + Facilitation resulted in the highest average CBT delivery (154.1 sessions) and the non-adaptive strategy offering REP + Coaching the lowest (94.5 sessions). The most effective strategy in terms of average SP-reported CBT delivery is the adaptive implementation strategy that (i) begins with REP, (ii) augments with Facilitation for slower-responder schools (schools where SPs identified organizational barriers or struggled to deliver CBT), and (iii) stays the course with REP for responder schools. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03541317 , May 30, 2018.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Schools increasingly provide mental health services to students, but often lack access to implementation strategies to support school-based (and school professional [SP]) delivery of evidence-based practices. Given substantial heterogeneity in implementation barriers across schools, development of adaptive implementation strategies that guide which implementation strategies to provide to which schools and when may be necessary to support scale-up.
METHODS
A clustered, sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART) of high schools across Michigan was used to inform the development of a school-level adaptive implementation strategy for supporting SP-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). All schools were first provided with implementation support informed by Replicating Effective Programs (REP) and then were randomized to add in-person Coaching or not (phase 1). After 8 weeks, schools were assessed for response based on SP-reported frequency of CBT delivered to students and/or barriers reported. Responder schools continued with phase 1 implementation strategies. Slower-responder schools (not providing ≥ 3 CBT components to ≥10 students or >2 organizational barriers identified) were re-randomized to add Facilitation to current support or not (phase 2). The primary aim hypothesis was that SPs at schools receiving the REP + Coaching + Facilitation adaptive implementation strategy would deliver more CBT sessions than SPs at schools receiving REP alone. Secondary aims compared four implementation strategies (Coaching vs no Coaching × Facilitation vs no Facilitation) on CBT sessions delivered, including by type (group, brief and full individual). Analyses used a marginal, weighted least squares approach developed for clustered SMARTs.
RESULTS
SPs (n = 169) at 94 high schools entered the study. N = 83 schools (88%) were slower-responders after phase 1. Contrary to the primary aim hypothesis, there was no evidence of a significant difference in CBT sessions delivered between REP + Coaching + Facilitation and REP alone (111.4 vs. 121.1 average total CBT sessions; p = 0.63). In secondary analyses, the adaptive strategy that offered REP + Facilitation resulted in the highest average CBT delivery (154.1 sessions) and the non-adaptive strategy offering REP + Coaching the lowest (94.5 sessions).
CONCLUSIONS
The most effective strategy in terms of average SP-reported CBT delivery is the adaptive implementation strategy that (i) begins with REP, (ii) augments with Facilitation for slower-responder schools (schools where SPs identified organizational barriers or struggled to deliver CBT), and (iii) stays the course with REP for responder schools.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03541317 , May 30, 2018.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35804370
doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01211-w
pii: 10.1186/s13012-022-01211-w
pmc: PMC9264291
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03541317']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
42Subventions
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01 DA039901
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : P50 DA054039
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH114203
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Implement Sci. 2007 Dec 09;2:42
pubmed: 18067681
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Jan;85(1):13-25
pubmed: 27548030
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 29;14(1):42
pubmed: 31036028
Implement Sci. 2020 Apr 25;15(1):26
pubmed: 32334632
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;64(12):1465-75
pubmed: 14728109
Child Dev. 2000 Jan-Feb;71(1):222-30
pubmed: 10836577
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Aug;26(4):1572-1589
pubmed: 28627310
Ment Health Serv Res. 2005 Mar;7(1):5-20
pubmed: 15832690
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29 Suppl 4:904-12
pubmed: 25355087
Implement Sci. 2015 May 14;10:69
pubmed: 25971405
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Dec;72(6):1050-62
pubmed: 15612851
J Sch Health. 2019 May;89(5):393-401
pubmed: 30883761
School Ment Health. 2014 May 1;6(2):99-111
pubmed: 26413173
Clin Psychol (New York). 2013 Jun 1;20(2):152-165
pubmed: 24072959
Health Aff (Millwood). 1995 Fall;14(3):147-59
pubmed: 7498888
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Jan;54(1):60-6
pubmed: 12509668
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Jan 1;71(1):79-82
pubmed: 31551041
Stat Med. 2014 Oct 30;33(24):4202-14
pubmed: 24919867
Med Care. 2019 Oct;57 Suppl 10 Suppl 3:S221-S227
pubmed: 31517791
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112433
pubmed: 31202612
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;159(9):1548-55
pubmed: 12202276
Psychiatr Serv. 2012 Mar;63(3):205-7
pubmed: 22388527
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:25
pubmed: 32885184
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Dec;81(6):999-1009
pubmed: 23978169
Med Care. 2020 Oct;58(10):874-880
pubmed: 32732780
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
J Sch Health. 2007 Feb;77(2):53-8
pubmed: 17222155
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;22(2):205-10
pubmed: 19553877
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Oct;58(10):1330-8
pubmed: 17914011
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;57(11):1229-1238
pubmed: 27002215
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Jun;77(3):383-96
pubmed: 19485581
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Mar 24;2(1):33
pubmed: 33762023
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008 Jan;37(1):262-301
pubmed: 18444061
Implement Sci. 2014 Sep 30;9:132
pubmed: 25267385
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 01;8:139
pubmed: 24289295
School Ment Health. 2009 Jun 1;1(2):49-60
pubmed: 20811511
Implement Sci. 2018 Sep 5;13(1):119
pubmed: 30185192
School Ment Health. 2012 Dec 1;4(4):197-206
pubmed: 24817916
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Jan 1;65(1):81-90
pubmed: 24129806
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;69(3):274-82
pubmed: 22065252
Implement Sci. 2021 Jun 7;16(1):60
pubmed: 34099004
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2016 Mar;86(2):156-70
pubmed: 26963185
Implement Sci. 2013 Nov 20;8:136
pubmed: 24252648
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Jan 1;66(1):90-3
pubmed: 25554233
Stat Med. 2016 May 10;35(10):1595-615
pubmed: 26638988
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2010 Jun 1;7(2):76-89
pubmed: 20180826
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013 Nov;40(6):439-50
pubmed: 23716145
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Aug 12;17(Suppl 1):S40-S49
pubmed: 31405875
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;59(4):552-564.e2
pubmed: 31926224
Adv Sch Ment Health Promot. 2015;8(3):124-145
pubmed: 26336512
Implement Sci. 2006 Oct 18;1:23
pubmed: 17049080
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Jun;77(3):566-79
pubmed: 19485596
Sch Psychol Q. 2013 Jun;28(2):141-153
pubmed: 23750860
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;49(10):980-9
pubmed: 20855043
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Jun;30(4):448-66
pubmed: 20304542
Implement Sci. 2011 Aug 23;6:96
pubmed: 21861886
Implement Sci. 2014 Dec 28;9:163
pubmed: 25544027
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55(6):954-965
pubmed: 33125166
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):165
pubmed: 32131824
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112520
pubmed: 31627960
Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Mar;8(1):3-15
pubmed: 10347857
Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 22;8:93
pubmed: 23965255
J Adolesc Health. 2005 Dec;37(6):477-83
pubmed: 16310125
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199
Implement Sci. 2016 Mar 10;11:33
pubmed: 27013464
J Educ Psychol Consult. 2012 Oct 1;22(4):280-299
pubmed: 23599661
Implement Sci. 2014 Sep 04;9:118
pubmed: 25185799
AIDS Educ Prev. 2000;12(5 Suppl):87-98
pubmed: 11063072
Psychol Sch. 2011 Mar;48(3):223-232
pubmed: 28775387
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Jun;77(3):397-409
pubmed: 19485582
School Ment Health. 2010 Sep;2(3):105-113
pubmed: 20694034
Child Youth Care Forum. 2012 Feb;41(1):1-19
pubmed: 22701295
Implement Sci. 2010 Oct 13;5:75
pubmed: 20942951
Med Care. 2019 Jul;57(7):503-511
pubmed: 31135692
Am Psychol. 2010 Feb-Mar;65(2):73-84
pubmed: 20141263
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015;44(5):730-41
pubmed: 24871692