Welfare Assessment of Invertebrates: Adapting the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (AWAG) for Zoo Decapods and Cephalopods.
animal welfare assessment grid
captive lifetime experience
cephalopod
decapod
invertebrates
public aquaria
quality of life
sentience
welfare
zoological collections
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Jun 2022
29 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
31
05
2022
revised:
17
06
2022
accepted:
25
06
2022
entrez:
9
7
2022
pubmed:
10
7
2022
medline:
10
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Consumer demand for invertebrates is on the rise as their numbers in the wild dwindle. However, with the growing conservation efforts of modern zoos and aquariums, and evidence from over 300 studies showing that invertebrates are capable of sentience, public interest, and moral concern for welfare of invertebrates have increased. The challenge for zoos and aquariums is in developing an objective and repeatable method for evaluating welfare that can be applied to invertebrates in zoological collections. Recently introduced into zoological collection management is the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (AWAG). The AWAG helps to identify negative and positive welfare states, through assessing animal- and environmental-based indicators to make changes that lead to a better quality of life. Originally developed for the assessment of laboratory primates, the system has been successfully adapted to assess a variety of taxa across different environments, facilitated by the development of cloud-based software. In this study, the AWAG has been adapted to assess the cumulative lifetime experience of captive decapods and cephalopods at two different institutions, Marwell Zoo and National Marine Aquarium. This study has provided further evidence that the AWAG is adaptable and demonstrates the first time any objective scoring system has been successfully adapted for use in invertebrates. Through graphical representation, the results show that the AWAG identifies changes in welfare scores that can be attributed to specific events and can be used to predict the future vulnerability of species to welfare changes and suggest alternative management methods. This monitoring tool provides a versatile method of implementing practical welfare monitoring in zoos and aquariums.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35804574
pii: ani12131675
doi: 10.3390/ani12131675
pmc: PMC9264806
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Vet Rec. 2017 Aug 5;181(6):143
pubmed: 28487453
Animals (Basel). 2012 Nov 14;2(4):628-39
pubmed: 26487167
Front Physiol. 2018 Jun 06;9:700
pubmed: 29962956
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0139372
pubmed: 26422508
Acta Vet Scand. 2017 Mar 15;59(1):17
pubmed: 28298228
Zoo Biol. 2009 Nov;28(6):589-608
pubmed: 19885915
Front Physiol. 2019 Sep 06;10:1141
pubmed: 31551817
Lab Anim. 2015 Jul;49(2 Suppl):1-90
pubmed: 26354955
Am J Primatol. 2014 Oct;76(10):942-55
pubmed: 24687450
Lab Anim. 2011 Jan;45(1):1-13
pubmed: 21123303
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0140237
pubmed: 26509670
J Biosci. 2000 Sep;25(3):301-13
pubmed: 11022233
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2017 May;207:13-20
pubmed: 28179140
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Mar 10;192(4):227
pubmed: 32157442
Animals (Basel). 2018 Jul 04;8(7):
pubmed: 29973560
J Vet Med Educ. 2010 Spring;37(1):83-8
pubmed: 20378884