Impacts of pH and Base Substitution during Deaerator Treatments of Herring Milt Hydrolysate on the Odorous Content and the Antioxidant Activity.
antioxidant activity
deaerator
deodorization
dimethylamine
herring milt hydrolysate
off-flavors
sensory analysis
trimethylamine
trimethylamine oxide
Journal
Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Jun 2022
22 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
02
06
2022
revised:
16
06
2022
accepted:
17
06
2022
entrez:
9
7
2022
pubmed:
10
7
2022
medline:
10
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the biological interest in herring milt hydrolysate (HMH), its valorization is limited by its unpleasant odor resulting from the presence of mainly amine and carbonyl compounds. Recently, a deaerator was demonstrated as an interesting avenue to reduce the odorous content of HMH. However, the removal rate of amine and carbonyl compounds was highly dependent on the operating conditions, and the impact of such a process on the biological potential of HMH was not considered. Therefore, this study aimed to optimize the deaerator process by assessing the impacts of the combination of deaerator treatments at neutral and basic pH, the increase in pH from 10 to 11, and the substitution of NaOH by KOH on the odorous content and the antioxidant activity of HMH. Results showed that the highest deodorization rate of HMH was obtained when a deaerator treatment at neutral pH was combined with another one at basic pH using KOH for alkalization. This condition resulted in a decrease in the dimethylamine and trimethylamine contents by 70%, while certain compounds such as 2,3-pentanedione, methional, (
Identifiants
pubmed: 35804649
pii: foods11131829
doi: 10.3390/foods11131829
pmc: PMC9265915
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Industrial Research Chair on ElectroMembrane processes aiming the ecoefficiency improvement of biofood production lines
ID : IRCPJ 492889-15
Références
Nutrients. 2020 Oct 22;12(11):
pubmed: 33105775
Food Chem. 2018 Jan 15;239:806-815
pubmed: 28873638
Foods. 2020 Oct 17;9(10):
pubmed: 33080879
Mar Drugs. 2020 Dec 11;18(12):
pubmed: 33322303
Food Chem. 2014 Apr 15;149:326-34
pubmed: 24295714
J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Oct 8;62(40):9676-82
pubmed: 25232667
J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Mar 24;52(6):1635-41
pubmed: 15030223
Food Chem. 2012 Dec 15;135(4):3020-38
pubmed: 22980905
Food Chem. 2011 Jun 15;126(4):1636-42
pubmed: 25213938
J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Aug 27;56(16):7459-66
pubmed: 18662014
Mar Drugs. 2019 Aug 03;17(8):
pubmed: 31382619
Food Chem. 2008 May 15;108(2):727-36
pubmed: 26059154
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Oct 28;30(10):1510-1515
pubmed: 32627760
J Agric Food Chem. 2010 Feb 10;58(3):1535-42
pubmed: 20085275
Food Chem. 2015 Apr 15;173:652-9
pubmed: 25466072
Membranes (Basel). 2020 Jun 20;10(6):
pubmed: 32575710
Food Chem. 2016 Apr 1;196:1207-14
pubmed: 26593608
J Agric Food Chem. 2013 Nov 20;61(46):10835-47
pubmed: 24156356
J Sci Food Agric. 2020 Jan 15;100(1):384-393
pubmed: 31595518
J Agric Food Chem. 2001 Aug;49(8):3898-905
pubmed: 11513686
J Hazard Mater. 2015 Mar 2;284:269-77
pubmed: 25664363
Plants (Basel). 2020 Nov 25;9(12):
pubmed: 33255775
Food Chem. 2017 Jun 1;224:160-171
pubmed: 28159251
Foods. 2021 Apr 17;10(4):
pubmed: 33920688
J Food Biochem. 2019 Feb;43(2):e12734
pubmed: 31353651