Histological and Biological Response to Different Types of Biomaterials: A Narrative Single Research Center Experience over Three Decades.
bone substitutes
grafts
scaffolds
tissue engineering
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 06 2022
28 06 2022
Historique:
received:
09
02
2022
revised:
27
06
2022
accepted:
27
06
2022
entrez:
9
7
2022
pubmed:
10
7
2022
medline:
14
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In more than three decades of work of the Retrieval Bank of the Laboratory for Undemineralized Hard Tissue Histology of the University of Chieti-Pescara in Italy, many types of biomaterials were received and evaluated. The present retrospective review aimed to evaluate the histological and biological aspects of the evaluated bone substitute biomaterials. In the present study, the authors prepared a retrospective analysis after the screening of some databases (PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE) to find papers published from the Retrieval Bank of the Laboratory for Undermineralized Hard Tissue Histology of the University of Chieti-Pescara analyzing only the papers dealing with bone substitute biomaterials and scaffolds, in the form of granules and block grafts, for bone regeneration procedures. Fifty-two articles were found, including in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies of different biomaterials. These articles were evaluated and organized in tables for a better understanding. Over three decades of studies have made it possible to assess the quality of many bone substitute biomaterials, helping to improve the physicochemical and biological properties of the biomaterials used in daily clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In more than three decades of work of the Retrieval Bank of the Laboratory for Undemineralized Hard Tissue Histology of the University of Chieti-Pescara in Italy, many types of biomaterials were received and evaluated. The present retrospective review aimed to evaluate the histological and biological aspects of the evaluated bone substitute biomaterials.
METHODS
In the present study, the authors prepared a retrospective analysis after the screening of some databases (PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE) to find papers published from the Retrieval Bank of the Laboratory for Undermineralized Hard Tissue Histology of the University of Chieti-Pescara analyzing only the papers dealing with bone substitute biomaterials and scaffolds, in the form of granules and block grafts, for bone regeneration procedures.
RESULTS
Fifty-two articles were found, including in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies of different biomaterials. These articles were evaluated and organized in tables for a better understanding.
CONCLUSIONS
Over three decades of studies have made it possible to assess the quality of many bone substitute biomaterials, helping to improve the physicochemical and biological properties of the biomaterials used in daily clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35805602
pii: ijerph19137942
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137942
pmc: PMC9265446
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biocompatible Materials
0
Bone Substitutes
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
J Periodontol. 2008 May;79(5):929-33
pubmed: 18454673
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Feb;31(1):73-7
pubmed: 11936404
Odontology. 2014 Jul;102(2):259-66
pubmed: 23783569
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):336-40
pubmed: 22442772
J Craniofac Surg. 2006 Nov;17(6):1243-50
pubmed: 17119439
Implant Dent. 2011 Oct;20(5):383-8
pubmed: 21909027
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Mar-Apr;34(2):e43-9
pubmed: 24600666
J Oral Implantol. 2010;36(6):491-6
pubmed: 20545540
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Mar;16(1):41-5
pubmed: 21947545
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Feb;17(1):150-62
pubmed: 23682753
Implant Dent. 2006 Jun;15(2):197-207
pubmed: 16766904
Materials (Basel). 2017 Sep 08;10(9):
pubmed: 28885576
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Jun;32(3):295-301
pubmed: 22408774
J Craniofac Surg. 2008 May;19(3):616-25; discussion 626-7
pubmed: 18520373
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jun;17(3):610-8
pubmed: 24004190
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 31;15(3):
pubmed: 35161065
J Oral Implantol. 2002;28(6):273-8
pubmed: 12498535
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Nov;24(11):1201-5
pubmed: 22882574
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2078104
pubmed: 27478828
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005 Aug 1;74(2):215-21
pubmed: 15948203
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 May;25(3):835-9
pubmed: 24820710
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Feb;16(1):45-53
pubmed: 21046419
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Oct;22(10):1125-1130
pubmed: 21251081
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49051
pubmed: 23152848
Eur J Histochem. 2013 Feb 27;57(1):e10
pubmed: 23549459
Implant Dent. 2016 Feb;25(1):6-15
pubmed: 26630463
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Apr;51(3):247-52
pubmed: 22766268
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 May;22(5):473-80
pubmed: 21087317
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Nov-Dec;22(6):980-6
pubmed: 18271380
J Periodontol. 2008 Jul;79(7):1232-40
pubmed: 18597606
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Nov;25(11):1251-1256
pubmed: 24102867
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Oct;16(5):736-50
pubmed: 23350548
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 Jul;74(1):448-57
pubmed: 15889429
Oral Implantol (Rome). 2017 Sep 27;10(2):190-196
pubmed: 29876044
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Oct;14(5):651-8
pubmed: 12969370
J Dent. 2021 Mar;106:103563
pubmed: 33482245
Aust Dent J. 2012 Jun;57(2):200-6
pubmed: 22624762
J Periodontol. 2014 Jan;85(1):14-23
pubmed: 23688103
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Jul;90(1):238-46
pubmed: 18496862
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Oct;26(10):1180-4
pubmed: 24861978
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Apr 18;19(4):
pubmed: 29670035
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Aug;68(8):1869-73
pubmed: 20452112
Biomaterials. 1998 May;19(10):889-96
pubmed: 9690830
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Dec;23(12):1369-76
pubmed: 22092377
J Periodontol. 2007 Aug;78(8):1635-8
pubmed: 17668984
Ann Anat. 2015 Nov;202:1-7
pubmed: 26325427
Connect Tissue Res. 2018 Dec;59(sup1):97-101
pubmed: 29745810
J Oral Implantol. 2006;32(3):122-31
pubmed: 16836176
J Oral Implantol. 2013 Dec;39(6):727-32
pubmed: 22103882
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jun;21(6):650-5
pubmed: 20666792
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 21;17(6):
pubmed: 32245226
Biomaterials. 1996 Apr;17(8):791-6
pubmed: 8730963
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2018 May 20;8(5):
pubmed: 29783786
J Periodontol. 2007 Oct;78(10):2057-61
pubmed: 18062129
J Transl Med. 2014 Oct 25;12:296
pubmed: 25344443
Oral Dis. 2007 Nov;13(6):586-93
pubmed: 17944677
Oral Dis. 2006 May;12(3):329-42
pubmed: 16700745
J Periodontol. 2004 Aug;75(8):1161-6
pubmed: 15455746
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999 Oct;10(5):406-14
pubmed: 10551065
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jan;22(1):505-513
pubmed: 28577053
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 Nov/Dec;40(6):e211-e227
pubmed: 33151185
J Oral Implantol. 2000;26(4):257-61
pubmed: 11831231
Materials (Basel). 2018 Aug 17;11(8):
pubmed: 30126102
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4086870
pubmed: 27413746
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;34(1):e9-17
pubmed: 24396851
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jan;20(1):17-23
pubmed: 19126103
Implant Dent. 2016 Oct;25(5):656-62
pubmed: 27551879
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jan-Feb;28(1):51-6
pubmed: 23377047
J Periodontol. 2007 May;78(5):955-61
pubmed: 17470032
Arch Oral Biol. 2006 Feb;51(2):154-63
pubmed: 16061197
Implant Dent. 2007 Jun;16(2):195-203
pubmed: 17563510