Item-Level Psychometric Analysis of the Psychosocial Processes at Work Scale (PROPSIT) in Workers.


Journal

International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 06 2022
Historique:
received: 31 03 2022
revised: 27 04 2022
accepted: 28 04 2022
entrez: 9 7 2022
pubmed: 10 7 2022
medline: 14 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The structural attributes and correlates of items have an effect on their composite scores and exploring them strengthens the content validity of a measure adapted to another context. The objective of this study was to evaluate the item properties of a measure of psychosocial work factors (PWFs). Data were collected through a web platform from 188 Peruvian working adults (men = 101, 50.5%) holding various professions and jobs. The instrument was the Psychosocial Processes at Work Scale (PROPSIT), adapted for the Peruvian context. The distributional characteristics, the efficiency of its response options and its correlates with engagement, occupational self-efficacy, general stress and psychological distress (explored with a coefficient of maximum information and another of monotonic association) were analyzed. It was found that the items were asymmetrically distributed, without statistical normality and with a response tendency at low (for psychosocial risk factors (PSRFs)) and medium (favorable psychosocial resources) levels. The number of efficient response options was lower (approximately five options) than the original structure (seven options). The monotonic associations with gender and age were essentially zero and theoretically converged with the external constructs, except for some items related to job demands. The contributions of the results to the content validity of the PROPSIT and the orientation of working hypotheses about PROPSIT item constructs and measures of work effects are discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35805629
pii: ijerph19137972
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137972
pmc: PMC9265707
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

Med Lav. 2014 Mar-Apr;105(2):100-8
pubmed: 24909042
Brief Bioinform. 2014 Nov;15(6):906-18
pubmed: 23962479
Psychosomatics. 2009 Nov-Dec;50(6):613-21
pubmed: 19996233
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):499-512
pubmed: 11419809
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 02;9(9):e107955
pubmed: 25275469
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 26;16(9):
pubmed: 31027356
Science. 2011 Dec 16;334(6062):1502-3
pubmed: 22174235
J Appl Meas. 2002;3(1):85-106
pubmed: 11997586
Occup Med (Lond). 2017 Dec 02;67(8):601-608
pubmed: 29016877
Saf Health Work. 2018 Jun;9(2):210-215
pubmed: 29928536
Radiol Med. 2014 May;119(5):359-66
pubmed: 24297590
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003 Dec;29(6):444-51
pubmed: 14712852
Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):3-25
pubmed: 29345484
Occup Med (Lond). 2010 Jun;60(4):277-86
pubmed: 20511268
Occup Med (Lond). 2017 Mar 01;67(2):135-142
pubmed: 27683875
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 31;11:84
pubmed: 32082226
Occup Environ Med. 2017 Mar;74(4):301-310
pubmed: 28108676
J Occup Health Psychol. 1996 Jan;1(1):27-41
pubmed: 9547031
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015 Jan;59(1):39-47
pubmed: 23919562
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006 Dec;32(6):443-62
pubmed: 17173201
Med Pr. 2018 Oct 30;69(5):573-581
pubmed: 30338765
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 14;8:1602
pubmed: 28959227
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(11):1040-8
pubmed: 19242984
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2009 Aug;7(4):663-84
pubmed: 19634197
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149
pubmed: 29942800
Science. 2011 Dec 16;334(6062):1518-24
pubmed: 22174245
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Aug;89(2):194-204
pubmed: 16162053
BMC Public Health. 2015 Aug 01;15:738
pubmed: 26232123
J Outcome Meas. 1999;3(2):103-22
pubmed: 10204322
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Mar;24(3):200-207
pubmed: 31954629
J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Oct;57(10):1127-37
pubmed: 26461869
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 02;14:543
pubmed: 24884543

Auteurs

César Merino-Soto (C)

Instituto de Investigación de Psicología, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, Lima 34, Peru.

Arturo Juárez-García (A)

Centro de Investigación Transdisciplinar en Psicología, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Pico de Orizaba 1, Los Volcanes, Cuernavaca 62350, Mexico.

Guillermo Salinas-Escudero (G)

Centro de Estudios Económicos y Sociales en Salud, Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gómez, National Institute of Health, Márquez 162, Doctores, Cuauhtémoc, Mexico City 06720, Mexico.

Filiberto Toledano-Toledano (F)

Unidad de Investigación en Medicina Basada en Evidencias, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, National Institute of Health, Márquez 162, Doctores, Cuauhtémoc, Mexico City 06720, Mexico.
Unidad de Investigación Sociomédica, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Calzada México-Xochimilco 289, Arenal de Guadalupe, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14389, Mexico.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH