Comparative assessment of satellite- and drone-based vegetation indices to predict arthropod biomass in shrub-steppes.

arthropod biomass coprophagous arthropods epigeous arthropods shrub steppe vegetation index

Journal

Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America
ISSN: 1051-0761
Titre abrégé: Ecol Appl
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9889808

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2022
Historique:
revised: 19 04 2022
received: 23 12 2021
accepted: 24 05 2022
pubmed: 10 7 2022
medline: 3 12 2022
entrez: 9 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Arthropod biomass is a key element in ecosystem functionality and a basic food item for many species. It must be estimated through traditional costly field sampling, normally at just a few sampling points. Arthropod biomass and plant productivity should be narrowly related because a large majority of arthropods are herbivorous, and others depend on these. Quantifying plant productivity with satellite or aerial vehicle imagery is an easy and fast procedure already tested and implemented in agriculture and field ecology. However, the capability of satellite or aerial vehicle imagery for quantifying arthropod biomass and its relationship with plant productivity has been scarcely addressed. Here, we used unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and satellite Sentinel-2 (S2) imagery to establish a relationship between plant productivity and arthropod biomass estimated through ground-truth field sampling in shrub steppes. We UAV-sampled seven plots of 47.6-72.3 ha at a 4-cm pixel resolution, subsequently downscaling spatial resolution to 50 cm resolution. In parallel, we used S2 imagery from the same and other dates and locations at 10-m spatial resolution. We related several vegetation indices (VIs) with arthropod biomass (epigeous, coprophagous, and four functional consumer groups: predatory, detritivore, phytophagous, and diverse) estimated at 41-48 sampling stations for UAV flying plots and in 67-79 sampling stations for S2. VIs derived from UAV were consistently and positively related to all arthropod biomass groups. Three out of seven and six out of seven S2-derived VIs were positively related to epigeous and coprophagous arthropod biomass, respectively. The blue normalized difference VI (BNDVI) and enhanced normalized difference VI (ENDVI) showed consistent and positive relationships with arthropod biomass, regardless of the arthropod group or spatial resolution. Our results showed that UAV and S2-VI imagery data may be viable and cost-efficient alternatives for quantifying arthropod biomass at large scales in shrub steppes. The relationship between VI and arthropod biomass is probably habitat-dependent, so future research should address this relationship and include several habitats to validate VIs as proxies of arthropod biomass.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35808937
doi: 10.1002/eap.2707
pmc: PMC10078389
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2707

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.

Références

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54700
pubmed: 23405088
Oecologia. 2004 Mar;139(1):1-10
pubmed: 14872336
Am Nat. 2003 Mar;161(3):459-77
pubmed: 12699224
Ecol Appl. 2022 Dec;32(8):e2707
pubmed: 35808937
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 12;9(1):19010
pubmed: 31831826
Am Nat. 2001 Jul;158(1):17-35
pubmed: 18707312
Science. 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1879-81
pubmed: 15031508
Sensors (Basel). 2008 Nov 17;8(11):7300-7322
pubmed: 27873930
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 12;12(10):e0186193
pubmed: 29023504
Ecol Appl. 2015 Apr;25(3):779-90
pubmed: 26214922
New Phytol. 2011 Jan;189(2):375-94
pubmed: 21083563
Naturwissenschaften. 2020 Sep 24;107(5):42
pubmed: 32970225
Am Nat. 1998 Oct;152(4):510-29
pubmed: 18811361

Auteurs

J Traba (J)

Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG-UAM). Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

J Gómez-Catasús (J)

Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG-UAM). Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Novia University of Applied Sciences, Ekenäs, Finland.

A Barrero (A)

Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG-UAM). Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

D Bustillo-de la Rosa (D)

Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG-UAM). Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

J Zurdo (J)

Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG-UAM). Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

I Hervás (I)

Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG-UAM). Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

C Pérez-Granados (C)

Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG-UAM). Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ecology Department, Alicante University, Alicante, Spain.

E L García de la Morena (EL)

Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG-UAM). Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Biodiversity Node S.L. Sector Foresta, Madrid, Spain.

A Santamaría (A)

Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG-UAM). Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

M Reverter (M)

Terrestrial Ecology Group (TEG-UAM). Department of Ecology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH