Quantitative dynamic wearable motion-based metric compared to patient-reported outcomes as indicators of functional recovery after lumbar fusion surgery.

Functional motion-based outcomes Fusion surgery Low back pain Lumbar function Lumbar spine Patient-reported outcomes Recovery profiles Wearable motion technologies

Journal

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
ISSN: 1879-1271
Titre abrégé: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8611877

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2022
Historique:
received: 03 12 2021
revised: 16 05 2022
accepted: 14 06 2022
pubmed: 10 7 2022
medline: 26 7 2022
entrez: 9 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Low back pain is a debilitating condition with poor patient outcomes despite the use of a wide variety of diagnostic and treatment modalities. A lack of objective metrics to support clinical decision-making may be a reason for these poor outcomes. This study aimed to compare patient recovery following lumbar fusion surgery using an objective motion-based metric (functional performance) and subjective patient-reported outcomes for pain, disability and kinesophobia. A prospective observational study was conducted on 121 patients that received a lumbar fusion surgery. A wearable motion system was used to quantify three-dimensional multi-planar lumbar motion and benchmark each patient's lumbar function prior to surgery and post-operatively at follow-up time points for up to 2 years. Patient recovery profiles after surgery were evaluated using the acquired functional motion data and compared to patient-reported outcomes. Our results found significant improvement after surgery in objective functional performance as well as patient-reported pain, disability, and kinesophobia. However, we found a delayed response in the objective metric, with meaningful improvement occurring only 6 months after fusion surgery. In contrast, we found significant improvement in all subjective scores as early as 6 weeks post-surgery. Objective motion-based metric provides a unique perspective to assessing patient's functional recovery. While it is associated with dimensions of pain, disability and fear avoidance, it is also distinct and assesses a uniquely different dimension of functional health. This information can form the basis for the use of objective metrics to gauge patient recovery after lumbar fusion surgery.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Low back pain is a debilitating condition with poor patient outcomes despite the use of a wide variety of diagnostic and treatment modalities. A lack of objective metrics to support clinical decision-making may be a reason for these poor outcomes. This study aimed to compare patient recovery following lumbar fusion surgery using an objective motion-based metric (functional performance) and subjective patient-reported outcomes for pain, disability and kinesophobia.
METHODS
A prospective observational study was conducted on 121 patients that received a lumbar fusion surgery. A wearable motion system was used to quantify three-dimensional multi-planar lumbar motion and benchmark each patient's lumbar function prior to surgery and post-operatively at follow-up time points for up to 2 years. Patient recovery profiles after surgery were evaluated using the acquired functional motion data and compared to patient-reported outcomes.
FINDINGS
Our results found significant improvement after surgery in objective functional performance as well as patient-reported pain, disability, and kinesophobia. However, we found a delayed response in the objective metric, with meaningful improvement occurring only 6 months after fusion surgery. In contrast, we found significant improvement in all subjective scores as early as 6 weeks post-surgery.
INTERPRETATION
Objective motion-based metric provides a unique perspective to assessing patient's functional recovery. While it is associated with dimensions of pain, disability and fear avoidance, it is also distinct and assesses a uniquely different dimension of functional health. This information can form the basis for the use of objective metrics to gauge patient recovery after lumbar fusion surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35809534
pii: S0268-0033(22)00136-X
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105706
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105706

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002733
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Safdar Khan (S)

Spine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Prasath Mageswaran (P)

Spine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Guy Brock (G)

Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Mariah Eisner (M)

Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Sue A Ferguson (SA)

Spine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

William S Marras (WS)

Spine Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: marras.1@osu.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH