Key Performance Indicators Used by Dairy Consultants During the Evaluation of Reproductive Performance in a First Visit.
dairy cattle consultant
first visit
key parameter
reproductive performance
survey
Journal
Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
07
02
2022
accepted:
20
05
2022
entrez:
11
7
2022
pubmed:
12
7
2022
medline:
12
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reproduction plays a fundamental role in the profitability of dairy farms. Consultants use key performance indicators (KPI) to monitor the reproductive performance of the farms. They must decipher between the most suitable ones to face two different scenarios that may need the analysis of different parameters: (1) approach in a first visit, and (2) routine visits. Forty-nine consultants specialized in dairy reproduction from 21 countries responded to an online survey conducted to determine the most suitable parameters in a first visit approach. The survey was comprised of 190 questions, 178 of them rated from 0 (irrelevant) to 10 (maximum importance) points. The questions were divided into 5 sections: (1) consultant and farm model, (2) general data of the farm, (3) cow reproduction, (4) postpartum and metabolic disease, and (5) heifer reproduction. The median, interquartile range, minimum and maximum values, and 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined for each question. Afterward, a multivariate analysis, using between-group linkage
Identifiants
pubmed: 35812881
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.871079
pmc: PMC9260265
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
871079Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Armengol, Fraile and Bach.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Dairy Sci. 1998 Jul;81(7):1848-54
pubmed: 9710751
J Dairy Sci. 2014 May;97(5):3017-27
pubmed: 24612798
J Dairy Sci. 2004 Aug;87(8):2730-42
pubmed: 15328299
J Reprod Dev. 2006 Feb;52(1):185-94
pubmed: 16538038
Animals (Basel). 2019 Mar 18;9(3):
pubmed: 30889779
Theriogenology. 2000 Jun;53(9):1729-59
pubmed: 10968418
Animal. 2019 Jul;13(S1):s65-s74
pubmed: 31280750
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):901-10
pubmed: 20172210
Animal. 2014 May;8 Suppl 1:185-98
pubmed: 24709163
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Dec;100(12):10292-10313
pubmed: 29153166
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jun;101(6):5115-5133
pubmed: 29605330
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Feb;96(2):1269-89
pubmed: 23182352
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Sep;95(9):5442-5460
pubmed: 22916951
Can J Vet Res. 2019 Jul;83(3):218-227
pubmed: 31308594
Theriogenology. 2015 May;83(8):1344-51
pubmed: 25702623
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2008 Mar;24(1):117-38
pubmed: 18299035
Animal. 2017 Aug;11(8):1372-1380
pubmed: 28173887
Vet J. 2017 Feb;220:80-87
pubmed: 28190502
Animal. 2014 May;8 Suppl 1:134-43
pubmed: 24680286
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Dec;97(12):7547-63
pubmed: 25306269
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Dec;89(12):4723-35
pubmed: 17106104
Theriogenology. 1999 Apr 1;51(5):875-81
pubmed: 10729010
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Dec;102(12):10695-10710
pubmed: 31521355
J Dairy Sci. 1985 Jul;68(7):1793-803
pubmed: 4031195
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jul;93(7):3086-102
pubmed: 20630227
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Aug;95(8):4683-98
pubmed: 22818482
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Oct;89(10):3876-85
pubmed: 16960063
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Apr;102(4):3754-3765
pubmed: 30772031
J Dairy Sci. 2011 Dec;94(12):6216-32
pubmed: 22118110
J Reprod Dev. 2010 Jan;56 Suppl:S1-7
pubmed: 20629210
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Dec;103(12):11524-11534
pubmed: 32981724