Antibody and cellular immune responses following dual COVID-19 vaccination within infection-naive residents of long-term care facilities: an observational cohort study.
Journal
The lancet. Healthy longevity
ISSN: 2666-7568
Titre abrégé: Lancet Healthy Longev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101773309
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
entrez:
11
7
2022
pubmed:
12
7
2022
medline:
12
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Older age and frailty are risk factors for poor clinical outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection. As such, COVID-19 vaccination has been prioritised for individuals with these factors, but there is concern that immune responses might be impaired due to age-related immune dysregulation and comorbidity. We aimed to study humoral and cellular responses to COVID-19 vaccines in residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs). In this observational cohort study, we assessed antibody and cellular immune responses following COVID-19 vaccination in members of staff and residents at 74 LTCFs across the UK. Staff and residents were eligible for inclusion if it was possible to link them to a pseudo-identifier in the COVID-19 datastore, if they had received two vaccine doses, and if they had given a blood sample 6 days after vaccination at the earliest. There were no comorbidity exclusion criteria. Participants were stratified by age (<65 years or ≥65 years) and infection status (previous SARS-CoV-2 infection [infection-primed group] or SARS-CoV-2 naive [infection-naive group]). Anticoagulated edetic acid (EDTA) blood samples were assessed and humoral and cellular responses were quantified. Between Dec 11, 2020, and June 27, 2021, blood samples were taken from 220 people younger than 65 years (median age 51 years [IQR 39-61]; 103 [47%] had previously had a SARS-CoV-2 infection) and 268 people aged 65 years or older of LTCFs (median age 87 years [80-92]; 144 [43%] had a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection). Samples were taken a median of 82 days (IQR 72-100) after the second vaccination. Antibody responses following dual vaccination were strong and equivalent between participants younger then 65 years and those aged 65 years and older in the infection-primed group (median 125 285 Au/mL [1128 BAU/mL] for <65 year olds These data reveal suboptimal post-vaccine immune responses within infection-naive residents of LTCFs, and they suggest the need for optimisation of immune protection through the use of booster vaccination. UK Government Department of Health and Social Care.
Sections du résumé
Background
Older age and frailty are risk factors for poor clinical outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection. As such, COVID-19 vaccination has been prioritised for individuals with these factors, but there is concern that immune responses might be impaired due to age-related immune dysregulation and comorbidity. We aimed to study humoral and cellular responses to COVID-19 vaccines in residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs).
Methods
In this observational cohort study, we assessed antibody and cellular immune responses following COVID-19 vaccination in members of staff and residents at 74 LTCFs across the UK. Staff and residents were eligible for inclusion if it was possible to link them to a pseudo-identifier in the COVID-19 datastore, if they had received two vaccine doses, and if they had given a blood sample 6 days after vaccination at the earliest. There were no comorbidity exclusion criteria. Participants were stratified by age (<65 years or ≥65 years) and infection status (previous SARS-CoV-2 infection [infection-primed group] or SARS-CoV-2 naive [infection-naive group]). Anticoagulated edetic acid (EDTA) blood samples were assessed and humoral and cellular responses were quantified.
Findings
Between Dec 11, 2020, and June 27, 2021, blood samples were taken from 220 people younger than 65 years (median age 51 years [IQR 39-61]; 103 [47%] had previously had a SARS-CoV-2 infection) and 268 people aged 65 years or older of LTCFs (median age 87 years [80-92]; 144 [43%] had a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection). Samples were taken a median of 82 days (IQR 72-100) after the second vaccination. Antibody responses following dual vaccination were strong and equivalent between participants younger then 65 years and those aged 65 years and older in the infection-primed group (median 125 285 Au/mL [1128 BAU/mL] for <65 year olds
Interpretation
These data reveal suboptimal post-vaccine immune responses within infection-naive residents of LTCFs, and they suggest the need for optimisation of immune protection through the use of booster vaccination.
Funding
UK Government Department of Health and Social Care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35813280
doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00118-0
pii: S2666-7568(22)00118-0
pmc: PMC9252532
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
e461-e469Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R011230/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
LS reports grants from the Department of Health and Social Care during the study and is a member of the Social Care Working Group, which reports to the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies. AH is a member of the New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group at the Department of Health. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 9;385(24):e85
pubmed: 34706170
Gut. 2022 Jan;71(1):226-229
pubmed: 34083386
Eur Respir J. 2014 Oct;44(4):1055-68
pubmed: 25142482
Nat Immunol. 2021 May;22(5):620-626
pubmed: 33674800
Sci Transl Med. 2021 Feb 3;13(579):
pubmed: 33536277
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27;383(9):804-805
pubmed: 32302079
Front Immunol. 2020 Oct 14;11:583019
pubmed: 33178213
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Feb 15;48(4):443-8
pubmed: 19140756
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Jun;2(6):e362-e370
pubmed: 34104901
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Nov;21(11):1539-1548
pubmed: 34174190
Immunology. 2007 Apr;120(4):435-46
pubmed: 17313487
Lancet. 2021 Jul 17;398(10296):207-209
pubmed: 34197809
Nat Immunol. 2011 Jul 10;12(8):786-95
pubmed: 21743478
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7872):417-422
pubmed: 34192737
Age Ageing. 2021 Feb 26;50(2):279-283
pubmed: 33320183
Blood Cancer J. 2021 Jul 30;11(7):136
pubmed: 34330895
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):99-111
pubmed: 33306989
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Nov;21(11):1529-1538
pubmed: 34174193
Cell Rep. 2021 Aug 10;36(6):109504
pubmed: 34352226
Immun Ageing. 2020 May 7;17:10
pubmed: 32399058
Aging health. 2010 Apr 1;6(2):169-176
pubmed: 20607105
Age Ageing. 2021 Jun 28;50(4):1019-1028
pubmed: 33710281
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8):
pubmed: 32381641
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Sep;2(9):e544-e553
pubmed: 34430954
Nat Immunol. 2009 Jan;10(1):116-125
pubmed: 19029902
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;20(12):1390-1400
pubmed: 32979318
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Jan;3(1):e13-e21
pubmed: 34935001
Semin Immunol. 2018 Dec;40:83-94
pubmed: 30501873
BMJ. 2021 Aug 20;374:n2015
pubmed: 34417194
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Dec 20;20(1):538
pubmed: 33342426
Euro Surveill. 2021 Sep;26(38):
pubmed: 34558406
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Lancet Rheumatol. 2021 Sep;3(9):e627-e637
pubmed: 34258590