Incidental Findings Among Youth Participating in Multimodal Imaging Research: Characteristics of Findings and Description of a Management Approach.
bipolar disorder
imaging
incidental findings
neuroimaging
youth
Journal
Frontiers in pediatrics
ISSN: 2296-2360
Titre abrégé: Front Pediatr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101615492
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
14
02
2022
accepted:
19
05
2022
entrez:
11
7
2022
pubmed:
12
7
2022
medline:
12
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Research imaging in healthy and clinical youth populations yields incidental findings that require a management strategy. Our primary objective was to document the frequency and nature of incidental findings within a research group integrating multiple imaging modalities. A second objective was to describe the evolution of an approach to handling incidental findings. A case example was included to display the intricacies of some of these scenarios. Youth, ages 13-20 years, with bipolar disorder, familial risk for bipolar disorder, or healthy controls, obtained one or a combination of neuroimaging, cardio-thoracic imaging, retinal imaging, and carotid imaging. All images were systematically reviewed for incidental findings. Overall, of 223 participants (
Identifiants
pubmed: 35813368
doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.875934
pmc: PMC9259791
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
875934Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Roane, Mio, Viner, Bettridge, Heyn, Roifman, Selkirk, Kertes, MacIntosh, Thayalasuthan, Detzler, Endre, Jimenez-Juan, Henry, Murray and Goldstein.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
PK declares his position on the advisory boards for Novartis, Alcon, Bayer, Novelty Nobility; Institutional financial support from Allergan, Bayer, Roche, Novartis; Personal financial support from Novartis, Bayer; and his position as an equity owner for ArcticDx. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Braz J Psychiatry. 2021 Mar-Apr;43(2):147-152
pubmed: 32785453
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Mar;5(1):49-66
pubmed: 20235863
JAMA Neurol. 2021 May 1;78(5):578-587
pubmed: 33749724
BMJ. 2009 Aug 17;339:b3016
pubmed: 19687093
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Nov;40(11):1818-1823
pubmed: 31624116
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Nov;20(5):743-7
pubmed: 15503329
Acad Radiol. 2017 Sep;24(9):1107-1113
pubmed: 28285838
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Nov;38(5):1009-13
pubmed: 24006134
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):46-7
pubmed: 23391062
Neurology. 2008 Jan 29;70(5):384-90
pubmed: 18227420
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):219-48, 211
pubmed: 18547191
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;45(8):1000-1006
pubmed: 16865043
Neurology. 2011 Dec 13;77(24):2123-7
pubmed: 22131543
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Dec 5;21(1):275
pubmed: 34865631
Brain Behav. 2017 Mar 29;7(5):e00676
pubmed: 28523219
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Feb;44(1):15-18
pubmed: 28597031
Br J Radiol. 2010 Jun;83(990):456-65
pubmed: 20335427
J Med Ethics. 2015 Oct;41(10):841-7
pubmed: 26063579
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Oct 06;12:58
pubmed: 25287578
J Epidemiol. 2010;20 Suppl 2:S498-504
pubmed: 20179362
J Law Med Ethics. 2021;49(2):269-281
pubmed: 34924060
J Med Ethics. 2009 Mar;35(3):194-9
pubmed: 19251973
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):298-304, 212
pubmed: 18547198
Neurosci J. 2013;2013:439145
pubmed: 26317093
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Oct;34(10):2021-5
pubmed: 23811972