Patch test results to extracts of synthetic garments in textile dye positive patients.
contact allergy
disperse dyes
extracts
patch testing
synthetic materials
Journal
Contact dermatitis
ISSN: 1600-0536
Titre abrégé: Contact Dermatitis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7604950
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
revised:
31
05
2022
received:
07
03
2022
accepted:
04
07
2022
pubmed:
12
7
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
entrez:
11
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Disperse dyes (DDs) are the most prevalent causes of textile-related allergic contact dermatitis and are used for colouring synthetic textile materials based on fibres such as polyester, acrylic, acetate and polyamide. Eight DDs are included in a textile dye mix (TDM) 6.6% petrolatum (pet.) in the European baseline patch test series. The aim of this study was to patch test TDM 6.6% pet. positive individuals with the extracts of synthetic fibre clothes that do not contain any of the pure DDs present in the TDM 6.6% to study the reactivity pattern. Seventy-three TDM-positive former patients tested between 2012 and 2017 at the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology in Malmö, Sweden were invited to join the study, 10 participated. Twenty-four textile items (collected in nine countries in Europe, Asia and North America in 2012) were extracted in dichloromethane. The TDM 6.6% was patch tested simultaneously with the 24 textile item preparations in petrolatum made from the extracts. Prior to patch testing the participants filled the 7-question questionnaire regarding possible symptoms from textile exposure. Ten individuals, agreed to join the study. Eight of them reacted to TDM 6.6%. Nine participants reacted to 20 of 24 extracts. One reacted to 19 extracts, another to 14, 3 to 5 extracts, 1 to 4, 1 to 3 extracts and 2 to 2 extracts. One was negative to all tested preparations including TDM 6.6%. The participants mainly reacted to six textile extracts. All controls tested negatively to tested extracts. Four individuals of the 10 TDM-allergic individuals previously had had problems after wearing clothes. Four out of the 10 participants had had atopic eczema in childhood. All women had dyed their hair with permanent hair dyes but none of the males. TDM-positive patients react to textile extracts made from synthetic garments, even if they do not contain any of the pure DDs present in TDM 6.6%. More studies are needed to pin-point the culprit haptens in these extracts.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Disperse dyes (DDs) are the most prevalent causes of textile-related allergic contact dermatitis and are used for colouring synthetic textile materials based on fibres such as polyester, acrylic, acetate and polyamide. Eight DDs are included in a textile dye mix (TDM) 6.6% petrolatum (pet.) in the European baseline patch test series.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to patch test TDM 6.6% pet. positive individuals with the extracts of synthetic fibre clothes that do not contain any of the pure DDs present in the TDM 6.6% to study the reactivity pattern.
METHODS
METHODS
Seventy-three TDM-positive former patients tested between 2012 and 2017 at the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology in Malmö, Sweden were invited to join the study, 10 participated. Twenty-four textile items (collected in nine countries in Europe, Asia and North America in 2012) were extracted in dichloromethane. The TDM 6.6% was patch tested simultaneously with the 24 textile item preparations in petrolatum made from the extracts. Prior to patch testing the participants filled the 7-question questionnaire regarding possible symptoms from textile exposure.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Ten individuals, agreed to join the study. Eight of them reacted to TDM 6.6%. Nine participants reacted to 20 of 24 extracts. One reacted to 19 extracts, another to 14, 3 to 5 extracts, 1 to 4, 1 to 3 extracts and 2 to 2 extracts. One was negative to all tested preparations including TDM 6.6%. The participants mainly reacted to six textile extracts. All controls tested negatively to tested extracts. Four individuals of the 10 TDM-allergic individuals previously had had problems after wearing clothes. Four out of the 10 participants had had atopic eczema in childhood. All women had dyed their hair with permanent hair dyes but none of the males.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
TDM-positive patients react to textile extracts made from synthetic garments, even if they do not contain any of the pure DDs present in TDM 6.6%. More studies are needed to pin-point the culprit haptens in these extracts.
Substances chimiques
Allergens
0
Coloring Agents
0
Hair Dyes
0
Petrolatum
8009-03-8
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
325-330Subventions
Organisme : The Edvard Welander-Finsen grant
Informations de copyright
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Ryberg K, Bråred-Christensson J, Engfeldt M, et al. Patch testing with a textile dye mix in two concentrations - a multicentre study by the Swedish contact dermatitis research group. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95(4):427-431.
Isaksson M, Ryberg K, Goossens A, Bruze M. Recommendation to include a textile dye mix in the European baseline series. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73(1):15-20.
Isaksson M, Ale I, Andersen KE, et al. Patch testing to a textile dye mix by the international contact dermatitis research group. Dermatitis. 2015;26(4):170-176.
Isaksson M, Ale I, Andersen KE, et al. Revised baseline series of the international contact research group. Dermatitis. 2020;31:e5-e7. doi:10.1097/DER.0000000000000532
Malinauskiene L, Zimerson E, Bruze M, Ryberg K, Isaksson M. Are allergenic disperse dyes used for dyeing textiles? Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67(3):141-148.
Ryberg K, Goossens A, Isaksson M, et al. Patch testing of patients allergic to Disperse Blue 106 and Disperse Blue 124 with thin-layer chromatograms and purified dyes. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;60(5):270-278.
Ryberg K, Gruvberger B, Zimerson E, et al. Chemical investigations of disperse dyes in patch test preparations. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;58(4):199-209.
Bruze M, Isaksson M, Gruvberger B, Frick-Engfeldt M. Recommendation of appropriate amounts of petrolatum preparation to be applied at patch testing. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56(5):281-285.
Fregert S. Manual of contact dermatitis. 2nd ed. Year book Medical Publishers, Inc; 1981. Chapter 10, Patch Testing:71-81.
Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, et al. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73(4):195-221.
Ryberg K, Agner T, Andersen KE, et al. Patch testing with a textile dye mix-a multicentre study. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;71(4):215-223.
Malinauskiene L, Zimerson E, Bruze M, Ryberg K, Isaksson M. Patch testing with the textile dyes Disperse Orange 1 and Disperse Yellow 3 and some of their potential metabolites, and simultaneous reactions to para-amino compounds. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;67(3):130-140.
Malinauskiene L, Zimerson E, Bruze M, Ryberg K, Isaksson M. Sensitizing capacity of Disperse Orange 1 and its potential metabolites from azo reduction and their cross-reactivity pattern. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;69(1):40-48.
Wilkinson DS, Fregert S, Magnusson B, et al. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 1970;50(4):287-292.
Malinauskiene L, Zimerson E, Bruze M, Ryberg K, Isaksson M. Textile dyes Disperse Orange 1 and Yellow 3 contain more than one allergen as shown by patch testing with thin-layer chromatograms. Dermatitis. 2011;22(6):335-343.
Hindsén M, Bruze M, Chistensen OB. Flare-up after oral challenge with nickel in relation to challenge dose and intensity and time of previous patch test reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44(4):616-623.
Björk AK, Bruze M, Engfeldt M, Nielsen C, Svedman C. The reactivity of the back revisited. Are there differences in reactivity in different parts of the back? Contact Dermatitis. 2017;76(1):19-26.
Ryberg K, Isaksson M, Gruvberger B, Hindsén M, Zimerson E, Bruze M. Contact allergy to textile dyes in southern Sweden. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;54(6):313-321.
Pesqué D, March-Rodriguez A, Dahlin J, et al. Bikini textile contact dermatitis: a sherlockian approach revealing 2.4-dichlorophenol as a potential textile contact allergen. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;85(6):679-685.