Accurate liquid biopsy for the diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis.
HEPATIC FIBROSIS
NONALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS
Journal
Gut
ISSN: 1468-3288
Titre abrégé: Gut
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985108R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
received:
01
04
2022
accepted:
30
06
2022
pubmed:
13
7
2022
medline:
10
1
2023
entrez:
12
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Clinical diagnosis and approval of new medications for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) require invasive liver biopsies. The aim of our study was to identify non-invasive biomarkers of NASH and/or liver fibrosis. This multicentre study includes 250 patients (discovery cohort, n=100 subjects (Bariatric Surgery Versus Non-alcoholic Steato-hepatitis - BRAVES trial); validation cohort, n=150 (Liquid Biopsy for NASH and Liver Fibrosis - LIBRA trial)) with histologically proven non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) or NASH with or without fibrosis. Proteomics was performed in monocytes and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) with iTRAQ-nano- Liquid Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry/Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), while flow cytometry measured perilipin-2 (PLIN2) and RAB14 in peripheral blood CD14 The algorithm for NASH using PLIN2 mean florescence intensity (MFI) combined with waist circumference, triglyceride, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and presence/absence of diabetes as covariates had an accuracy of 93% in the discovery cohort and of 92% in the validation cohort. Sensitivity and specificity were 95% and 90% in the discovery cohort and 88% and 100% in the validation cohort, respectively.The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) for NAS level prediction ranged from 83.7% (CI 75.6% to 91.8%) in the discovery cohort to 97.8% (CI 95.8% to 99.8%) in the validation cohort.The algorithm including RAB14 MFI, age, waist circumference, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, plasma glucose and ALT levels as covariates to predict the presence of liver fibrosis yielded an AUROC of 95.9% (CI 87.9% to 100%) in the discovery cohort and 99.3% (CI 98.1% to 100%) in the validation cohort, respectively. Accuracy was 99.25%, sensitivity 100% and specificity 95.8% in the discovery cohort and 97.6%, 99% and 89.6% in the validation cohort. This novel biomarker was superior to currently used FIB4, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio and was comparable to ultrasound two-dimensional shear wave elastography. The proposed novel liquid biopsy is accurate, sensitive and specific in diagnosing the presence and severity of NASH or liver fibrosis and is more reliable than currently used biomarkers. Discovery multicentre cohort: Bariatric Surgery versus Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis, BRAVES, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03524365.Validation multicentre cohort: Liquid Biopsy for NASH and Fibrosis, LIBRA, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04677101.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35820779
pii: gutjnl-2022-327498
doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327498
pmc: PMC9872242
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
rab GTP-Binding Proteins
EC 3.6.5.2
Rab14 protein, human
EC 3.6.1.-
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03524365', 'NCT04677101']
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
392-403Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: GM reports consulting fees from Novo Nordisk,_Fractyl Inc and Recor Inc; she is also scientific current advisor and consultant of Metadeq Limited, and current advisor and consultant of Keyron Limited, GHP Scientific Limited, and Jemyll Limited. FR reports receiving research grants from Ethicon and Medtronic; consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Ethicon and Medtronic; serving on scientific advisory boards for GI Dynamics; and is former director and current stock option holder of Metadeq Limited and former director and current advisor of Keyron Limited and GHP Scientific Limited. CWlR reports grants from the Irish Research Council, Science Foundation Ireland, Anabio and the Health Research Board; serves on advisory boards of Novo Nordisk, Herbalife, GI Dynamics, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Sanofi Aventis, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glia and Boehringer Ingelheim. ClR is a member of the Irish Society for Nutrition and Metabolism outside the area of work commented on here, and is the chief medical officer and director of the Medical Device Division of Keyron since January 2011; both of these are unremunerated positions. CWlR is also current director, shareholder and stock option holder of Metadeq Limited, current director of GHP Scientific Limited, was a previous investor in Keyron, which develops endoscopically implantable medical devices intended to mimic the surgical procedures of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass. The product has only been tested in rodents and none of Keyron’s products are currently licensed. They do not have any contracts with other companies to put their products into clinical practice. No patients have been included in any of Keyron’s studies and they are not listed on the stock market. He continues to provide scientific advice to Keyron for no remuneration. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
J Hepatol. 2006 Jun;44(6):1167-74
pubmed: 16618517
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr 1;163(7):670-5
pubmed: 16410346
Hepatology. 2011 Mar;53(3):810-20
pubmed: 21319198
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Mar;8(3):169-77
pubmed: 21304475
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Feb;39(3):254-69
pubmed: 24308774
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Apr 19;107(5):e2008-e2020
pubmed: 34971370
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 23;377(21):2063-2072
pubmed: 29166236
Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):134-144
pubmed: 28859228
Hepatol Commun. 2018 May 04;2(7):807-820
pubmed: 30027139
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Sep;1(1):56-67
pubmed: 28404113
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 12;10(1):2786
pubmed: 32051424
J Hepatol. 2018 Feb;68(2):305-315
pubmed: 29154965
Blood. 2007 Dec 1;110(12):4077-85
pubmed: 17690256
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016 May 1;310(9):G726-38
pubmed: 26968211
Nat Immunol. 2013 Oct;14(10):986-95
pubmed: 24048120
Am J Pathol. 2012 Apr;180(4):1340-55
pubmed: 22387320
J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Apr;41(4):877-886
pubmed: 34170033
Commun Biol. 2018 Jun 13;1:69
pubmed: 30271951
Metabolism. 2022 Jan;126:154911
pubmed: 34648769
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2017 Oct;1862(10 Pt B):1221-1232
pubmed: 28754637
Liver Int. 2018 Feb;38 Suppl 1:64-66
pubmed: 29427497
Hepatology. 2005 Jun;41(6):1313-21
pubmed: 15915461
Hepatology. 2018 May;67(5):1754-1767
pubmed: 28833331
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Jun 01;9:648384
pubmed: 34141705
Hepatology. 1996 Aug;24(2):289-93
pubmed: 8690394
Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):389-97.e10
pubmed: 25935633
J Lipid Res. 2010 Oct;51(10):3046-54
pubmed: 20631297
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Feb;51(3):374-387
pubmed: 31825539
Matrix Biol. 2015 May-Jul;44-46:207-23
pubmed: 25794647
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jul;20(7):1702-1709
pubmed: 29527789
J Hepatol. 2019 Oct;71(4):793-801
pubmed: 31279902
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9729107
pubmed: 28326329
Cell Chem Biol. 2016 Jun 23;23(6):689-99
pubmed: 27265749
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 21;385(17):1547-1558
pubmed: 34670042
Cell Mol Immunol. 2021 Aug;18(8):2059-2060
pubmed: 33976405
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Apr;2(2):233-42
pubmed: 19072358
Hepatology. 2012 Nov;56(5):1751-9
pubmed: 22707395
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Aug;5(8):739-752
pubmed: 32413340