Do mindfulness-based programmes improve the cognitive skills, behaviour and mental health of children and adolescents? An updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Child & adolescent psychiatry
Journal
Evidence-based mental health
ISSN: 1468-960X
Titre abrégé: Evid Based Ment Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883413
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Jul 2022
12 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
01
03
2022
accepted:
23
06
2022
entrez:
12
7
2022
pubmed:
13
7
2022
medline:
13
7
2022
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) are an increasingly popular approach to improving mental health in young people. Our previous meta-analysis suggested that MBPs show promising effectiveness, but highlighted a lack of high-quality, adequately powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs). This updated meta-analysis assesses the-state-of the-art of MBPs for young people in light of new studies. It explores MBP's effectiveness in active vs passive controls; selective versus universal interventions; and studies that included follow-up. We searched for published and unpublished RCTs of MBPs with young people (<19 years) in PubMed Central, PsycINFO, Web of Science, EMBASE, ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, EThOS, EBSCO and Google Scholar. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted, and standardised mean differences (Cohen's d) were calculated. Sixty-six RCTs, involving 20 138 participants (9552 receiving an MBP and 10 586 controls), were identified. Compared with passive controls, MBPs were effective in improving anxiety/stress, attention, executive functioning, and negative and social behaviour (d from 0.12 to 0.35). Compared against active controls, MBPs were more effective in reducing anxiety/stress and improving mindfulness (d=0.11 and 0.24, respectively). In studies with a follow-up, there were no significant positive effects of MBPs. No consistent pattern favoured MBPs as a universal versus selective intervention. The enthusiasm for MBPs in youth has arguably run ahead of the evidence. While MBPs show promising results for some outcomes, in general, the evidence is of low quality and inconclusive. We discuss a conceptual model and the theory-driven innovation required to realise the potential of MBPs in supporting youth mental health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35820989
pii: ebmental-2022-300464
doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2022-300464
pmc: PMC9340039
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00030/5
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: WK is the Director of the Oxford Mindfulness Centre and receives royalties for several books on mindfulness. JM-M is associated with the Oxford Mindfulness Centre.
Références
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58
pubmed: 12111919
Evid Based Ment Health. 2022 Jul 12;:
pubmed: 35820993
Biometrics. 2000 Jun;56(2):455-63
pubmed: 10877304
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Mar;22(1):264-71
pubmed: 23376348
Psychol Med. 2017 Apr;47(6):990-999
pubmed: 28031068
J Affect Disord. 2020 Jan 1;260:660-669
pubmed: 31546105
BMJ. 2016 Jun 30;353:i2089
pubmed: 27365494
Qual Life Res. 2021 Dec;30(12):3407-3419
pubmed: 34169412
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Aug;30(6):768-78
pubmed: 20619943
Evid Based Ment Health. 2022 Jul 12;:
pubmed: 35820992
Prev Sci. 2022 Aug;23(6):934-953
pubmed: 35267177
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Oct 15;27(3):030201
pubmed: 29180912
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Aug;68(4):615-23
pubmed: 10965637
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;60(3):244-258
pubmed: 30345511