School-based mindfulness training in early adolescence: what works, for whom and how in the MYRIAD trial?
adolescence
implementation
mediation
mental health
moderation
preventive medicine
process evaluation
school-based mindfulness training
Journal
Evidence-based mental health
ISSN: 1468-960X
Titre abrégé: Evid Based Ment Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883413
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Jul 2022
12 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
03
02
2022
accepted:
16
05
2022
entrez:
12
7
2022
pubmed:
13
7
2022
medline:
13
7
2022
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Preventing mental health problems in early adolescence is a priority. School-based mindfulness training (SBMT) is an approach with mixed evidence. To explore for whom SBMT does/does not work and what influences outcomes. The My Resilience in Adolescence was a parallel-group, cluster randomised controlled trial (K=84 secondary schools; n=8376 students, age: 11-13) recruiting schools that provided standard social-emotional learning. Schools were randomised 1:1 to continue this provision (control/teaching as usual (TAU)), and/or to offer SBMT ('.b' (intervention)). Risk of depression, social-emotional-behavioural functioning and well-being were measured at baseline, preintervention, post intervention and 1 year follow-up. Hypothesised moderators, implementation factors and mediators were analysed using mixed effects linear regressions, instrumental variable methods and path analysis. SBMT versus TAU resulted in worse scores on risk of depression and well-being in students at risk of mental health problems both at post intervention and 1-year follow-up, but differences were small and not clinically relevant. Higher dose and reach were associated with worse social-emotional-behavioural functioning at postintervention. No implementation factors were associated with outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Pregains-postgains in mindfulness skills and executive function predicted better outcomes at 1-year follow-up, but the SBMT was unsuccessful to teach these skills with clinical relevance.SBMT as delivered in this trial is not indicated as a universal intervention. Moreover, it may be contraindicated for students with existing/emerging mental health symptoms. Universal SBMT is not recommended in this format in early adolescence. Future research should explore social-emotional learning programmes adapted to the unique needs of young people.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Preventing mental health problems in early adolescence is a priority. School-based mindfulness training (SBMT) is an approach with mixed evidence.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To explore for whom SBMT does/does not work and what influences outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
The My Resilience in Adolescence was a parallel-group, cluster randomised controlled trial (K=84 secondary schools; n=8376 students, age: 11-13) recruiting schools that provided standard social-emotional learning. Schools were randomised 1:1 to continue this provision (control/teaching as usual (TAU)), and/or to offer SBMT ('.b' (intervention)). Risk of depression, social-emotional-behavioural functioning and well-being were measured at baseline, preintervention, post intervention and 1 year follow-up. Hypothesised moderators, implementation factors and mediators were analysed using mixed effects linear regressions, instrumental variable methods and path analysis.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
SBMT versus TAU resulted in worse scores on risk of depression and well-being in students at risk of mental health problems both at post intervention and 1-year follow-up, but differences were small and not clinically relevant. Higher dose and reach were associated with worse social-emotional-behavioural functioning at postintervention. No implementation factors were associated with outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Pregains-postgains in mindfulness skills and executive function predicted better outcomes at 1-year follow-up, but the SBMT was unsuccessful to teach these skills with clinical relevance.SBMT as delivered in this trial is not indicated as a universal intervention. Moreover, it may be contraindicated for students with existing/emerging mental health symptoms.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Universal SBMT is not recommended in this format in early adolescence. Future research should explore social-emotional learning programmes adapted to the unique needs of young people.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35820993
pii: ebmental-2022-300439
doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2022-300439
pmc: PMC9340034
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00030/5
Pays : United Kingdom
Investigateurs
Saz Ahmed
(S)
Louise Aukland
(L)
Marc Bennett
(M)
Triona Casey
(T)
Nicola Dalrymple
(N)
Eleanor-Rose Farley
(ER)
Katie Fletcher
(K)
Lucy Foulkes
(L)
Kirsty Griffiths
(K)
Cait Griffin
(C)
Jennifer Harper
(J)
Nils Kappelmann
(N)
Maria Kempnich
(M)
Konstantina Komninidou
(K)
Rachel Knight
(R)
Suzannah Laws
(S)
Jovita Leung
(J)
Emma Medlicott
(E)
Lucy Palmer
(L)
Jenna Parker
(J)
Ariane Petit
(A)
Alice Philips
(A)
Blanca Piera Pi-Sunyer
(BP)
Isobel Pryor-Nitsch
(I)
Lucy Radley
(L)
Jem Shackleford
(J)
Ashok Sakhardande
(A)
Elise Sellars
(E)
Anna Sonley
(A)
Alice Tickell
(A)
Maris Vainre
(M)
Lucy Warriner
(L)
Brian Wainman
(B)
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: WK is the director of the Oxford Mindfulness Centre and receives royalties for several books on mindfulness. JMGW is former director of the Oxford Mindfulness Centre and receives royalties for several books on mindfulness.
Références
J Am Coll Health. 2022 Apr;70(3):791-800
pubmed: 32432974
Trials. 2017 Apr 26;18(1):194
pubmed: 28446223
Lancet. 2012 Apr 28;379(9826):1630-40
pubmed: 22538178
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):267-77
pubmed: 18354399
Mindfulness (N Y). 2019 Jun 4;10(2):376-389
pubmed: 31186817
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):162
pubmed: 29207961
Trials. 2021 Apr 7;22(1):254
pubmed: 33827652
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;203(2):126-31
pubmed: 23787061
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Jan 1;39(1):99
pubmed: 20157642
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Oct;17(47):vii-xvii, 1-109
pubmed: 24172024
Stat Med. 2007 Nov 20;26(26):4719-45
pubmed: 17476649
Soc Indic Res. 2013 Feb;110(3):837-861
pubmed: 23329863
Evid Based Ment Health. 2022 Jul 12;:
pubmed: 35820992
Prev Sci. 2022 Aug;23(6):934-953
pubmed: 35267177
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 06;11:565231
pubmed: 33488443
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 21;11:487
pubmed: 21693055
Pediatrics. 2013 Mar;131(3):e702-8
pubmed: 23400608
Lancet. 2018 Dec 8;392(10163):2465-2477
pubmed: 30473365
Evid Based Ment Health. 2022 Jul 12;:
pubmed: 35820990
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;27(1):281-295
pubmed: 34079068