Temperature impacts on fish physiology and resource abundance lead to faster growth but smaller fish sizes and yields under warming.
body size
climate change
fisheries yield
food web
metabolic theory
multi species
size spectrum
Journal
Global change biology
ISSN: 1365-2486
Titre abrégé: Glob Chang Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9888746
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2022
11 2022
Historique:
revised:
28
05
2022
received:
04
10
2021
accepted:
27
06
2022
pubmed:
14
7
2022
medline:
5
10
2022
entrez:
13
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Resolving the combined effect of climate warming and exploitation in a food web context is key for predicting future biomass production, size-structure and potential yields of marine fishes. Previous studies based on mechanistic size-based food web models have found that bottom-up processes are important drivers of size-structure and fisheries yield in changing climates. However, we know less about the joint effects of 'bottom-up' and physiological effects of temperature; how do temperature effects propagate from individual-level physiology through food webs and alter the size-structure of exploited species in a community? Here, we assess how a species-resolved size-based food web is affected by warming through both these pathways and by exploitation. We parameterize a dynamic size spectrum food web model inspired by the offshore Baltic Sea food web, and investigate how individual growth rates, size-structure, and relative abundances of species and yields are affected by warming. The magnitude of warming is based on projections by the regional coupled model system RCA4-NEMO and the RCP 8.5 emission scenario, and we evaluate different scenarios of temperature dependence on fish physiology and resource productivity. When accounting for temperature-effects on physiology in addition to on basal productivity, projected size-at-age in 2050 increases on average for all fish species, mainly for young fish, compared to scenarios without warming. In contrast, size-at-age decreases when temperature affects resource dynamics only, and the decline is largest for young fish. Faster growth rates due to warming, however, do not always translate to larger yields, as lower resource carrying capacities with increasing temperature tend to result in decline in the abundance of larger fish and hence spawning stock biomass. These results suggest that to understand how global warming affects the size structure of fish communities, both direct metabolic effects and indirect effects of temperature via basal resources must be accounted for.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35822557
doi: 10.1111/gcb.16341
pmc: PMC9804230
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6239-6253Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Am Nat. 2004 Mar;163(3):429-41
pubmed: 15026978
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Oct 26;3(10):160416
pubmed: 27853557
Ecol Lett. 2014 Aug;17(8):902-14
pubmed: 24894409
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 25;116(26):12907-12912
pubmed: 31186360
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jul;25(7):2285-2295
pubmed: 30932292
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Sep;23(9):3667-3674
pubmed: 28296022
Ecol Lett. 2008 Jul;11(7):710-6
pubmed: 18422635
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 24;114(4):717-721
pubmed: 28028218
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Dec 21;375(1814):20190449
pubmed: 33131431
Ecol Lett. 2011 Sep;14(9):914-21
pubmed: 21752171
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 20;109(47):19310-4
pubmed: 23129645
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Mar;26(3):1306-1318
pubmed: 31802576
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 28;108(26):10591-6
pubmed: 21606358
Am Nat. 2011 Feb;177(2):211-23
pubmed: 21460557
Science. 2001 Sep 21;293(5538):2248-51
pubmed: 11567137
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Dec 20;:
pubmed: 30570185
Biol Lett. 2013 Jan 30;9(2):20121103
pubmed: 23365151
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Nov;28(21):6239-6253
pubmed: 35822557
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jan 6;106(1):197-202
pubmed: 19109431
Science. 2019 Mar 1;363(6430):979-983
pubmed: 30819962
Am Nat. 2006 Jul;168(1):54-61
pubmed: 16685635
Nat Clim Chang. 2021;11(11):973-981
pubmed: 34745348
Science. 2015 Jan 16;347(6219):1255641
pubmed: 25593191
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7461-5
pubmed: 17460046
Sci Rep. 2018 May 8;8(1):7132
pubmed: 29740021
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Nov 5;367(1605):2923-34
pubmed: 23007080
J Theor Biol. 2011 Mar 7;272(1):113-22
pubmed: 21146543
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 30;10(7):e0133794
pubmed: 26226590
Science. 2007 Nov 23;318(5854):1247-8
pubmed: 18033868
Conserv Physiol. 2019 Jun 10;7(1):coz025
pubmed: 31380108
Nat Commun. 2017 Mar 27;8:14884
pubmed: 28345669
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Jan;21(1):154-64
pubmed: 25044507
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Nov 5;367(1605):2979-89
pubmed: 23007086
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):12788-93
pubmed: 19620720
Ecol Appl. 2017 Dec;27(8):2262-2276
pubmed: 28746981
J Fish Biol. 2018 Apr;92(4):1016-1034
pubmed: 29479694
Nat Commun. 2014 Jun 12;5:4152
pubmed: 24920387
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 18;106(33):13860-4
pubmed: 19666552
Science. 2013 Sep 13;341(6151):1239-42
pubmed: 24031017
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Jun;4(6):809-814
pubmed: 32251381
Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2016;8:217-41
pubmed: 26163011
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Apr;28(7):2259-2271
pubmed: 35060649
Methods Ecol Evol. 2014 Oct;5(10):1121-1125
pubmed: 25866613
Emerg Top Life Sci. 2019 May 10;3(2):233-243
pubmed: 33523153
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Mar;19(3):724-33
pubmed: 23504830
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Mar 7;277(1682):795-802
pubmed: 19906668
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Apr;20(4):1023-31
pubmed: 24375891
Am Nat. 2018 Dec;192(6):687-697
pubmed: 30444656