The physiotherapy workforce in Nepal: A national survey.
Nepal
physiotherapy
workforce survey
Journal
Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
ISSN: 1365-2753
Titre abrégé: J Eval Clin Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9609066
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
revised:
05
06
2022
received:
19
02
2022
accepted:
09
06
2022
pubmed:
14
7
2022
medline:
18
1
2023
entrez:
13
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Physiotherapy is a relatively young profession in Nepal. Education standards, and workforce organization and representation have improved in recent years, but there is no detailed workforce data to support decision-making and long-term planning. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the demographic characteristics, physiotherapy practice areas, settings and employment characteristics of physiotherapists in Nepal; and to document job satisfaction and the factors that influence it. In a cross-sectional survey, we asked Nepali physiotherapists about their sociodemographic characteristics, employment or physiotherapy practice area and settings, and job satisfaction. We assessed the associations between sociodemographic factors and job satisfaction among physiotherapists using univariable and multivariable logistic regressions. We invited all Nepali physiotherapists to participate via email, social media and visits to hospitals. Of the 1120 physiotherapists who were contacted, 52% (female: 287; male: 293) completed the survey. The majority of the participants (75%) were less than 30 years old. The majority (73%) held a Bachelor of Physiotherapy degree. Eighty percent were employed at the time of data collection; 58% had 1-4 years of experience. The majority (77%) practiced in or near the capital Kathmandu. Most physiotherapist worked either in private hospitals (46%) or in private physiotherapy practices (26%), rehabilitation centres (19%) and 11% practiced in public hospitals. The most common areas of practice were musculoskeletal physiotherapy (90%) and adult neurology (67%). More than half of the physiotherapist (53%) felt that they were underpaid and 41% were not satisfied with their current job status. The majority of the physiotherapists (67%) reported that they participated in continuing professional development activities. Multivariable logistic regression showed that physiotherapists who had a higher remuneration were more likely to be satisfied with their job. The majority of the physiotherapy workforce in Nepal is well-educated, young and at an early career stage. Most physiotherapists work in musculoskeletal and adult neurological physiotherapy, in private practices or private hospitals near Kathmandu. Job dissatisfaction was common and was related to low annual income. This first nationwide survey described the current physiotherapy workforce and provides comparison data for future physiotherapy workforce surveys.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Physiotherapy is a relatively young profession in Nepal. Education standards, and workforce organization and representation have improved in recent years, but there is no detailed workforce data to support decision-making and long-term planning. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the demographic characteristics, physiotherapy practice areas, settings and employment characteristics of physiotherapists in Nepal; and to document job satisfaction and the factors that influence it.
METHODS
In a cross-sectional survey, we asked Nepali physiotherapists about their sociodemographic characteristics, employment or physiotherapy practice area and settings, and job satisfaction. We assessed the associations between sociodemographic factors and job satisfaction among physiotherapists using univariable and multivariable logistic regressions. We invited all Nepali physiotherapists to participate via email, social media and visits to hospitals.
RESULTS
Of the 1120 physiotherapists who were contacted, 52% (female: 287; male: 293) completed the survey. The majority of the participants (75%) were less than 30 years old. The majority (73%) held a Bachelor of Physiotherapy degree. Eighty percent were employed at the time of data collection; 58% had 1-4 years of experience. The majority (77%) practiced in or near the capital Kathmandu. Most physiotherapist worked either in private hospitals (46%) or in private physiotherapy practices (26%), rehabilitation centres (19%) and 11% practiced in public hospitals. The most common areas of practice were musculoskeletal physiotherapy (90%) and adult neurology (67%). More than half of the physiotherapist (53%) felt that they were underpaid and 41% were not satisfied with their current job status. The majority of the physiotherapists (67%) reported that they participated in continuing professional development activities. Multivariable logistic regression showed that physiotherapists who had a higher remuneration were more likely to be satisfied with their job.
CONCLUSIONS
The majority of the physiotherapy workforce in Nepal is well-educated, young and at an early career stage. Most physiotherapists work in musculoskeletal and adult neurological physiotherapy, in private practices or private hospitals near Kathmandu. Job dissatisfaction was common and was related to low annual income. This first nationwide survey described the current physiotherapy workforce and provides comparison data for future physiotherapy workforce surveys.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35822869
doi: 10.1111/jep.13729
pmc: PMC10084353
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
69-82Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Nov;27(11):1578-1589
pubmed: 31278997
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014 Feb 15;24(1):12-8
pubmed: 24627710
Physiother Can. 2019 Summer;71(3):213-219
pubmed: 31719717
J Glob Health. 2019 Dec;9(2):020317
pubmed: 33274068
Aust Health Rev. 2016 Sep;40(4):438-442
pubmed: 26536297
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2013 May;11(24):I-II
pubmed: 24362619
Physiother Res Int. 2021 Jul;26(3):e1905
pubmed: 33783923
BMC Nurs. 2019 Nov 28;18:58
pubmed: 31798340
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2019 Nov;30(4):787-794
pubmed: 31563170
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020 May 11;13:11
pubmed: 32426143
Physiother Res Int. 2021 Jul;26(3):e1907
pubmed: 33829607
BMJ. 2017 Jan 6;356:i6748
pubmed: 28062522
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 27;9(3):e026874
pubmed: 30918037
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2006-2017
pubmed: 33275908
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Jun;35:67-72
pubmed: 29549814
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602
pubmed: 27733282
J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;29(1):69-82
pubmed: 35822869
Physiother Res Int. 2016 Jun;21(2):127-32
pubmed: 25891982
BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Aug 17;17(1):115
pubmed: 28818057
J Occup Health. 2004 Nov;46(6):500-5
pubmed: 15613776
Pain Rep. 2019 Dec 06;4(6):e788
pubmed: 31984293
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Jun;94:21-31
pubmed: 30928718
Physiotherapy. 2018 Jun;104(2):232-238
pubmed: 28779970
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 25;11(2):e041728
pubmed: 33632751
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 16;9:132
pubmed: 29503623
Hum Resour Health. 2007 Sep 25;5:23
pubmed: 17894885
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Sep 19;4:362
pubmed: 21929815
Physiother Res Int. 2020 Jul;25(3):e1828
pubmed: 31908113
Clin Rehabil. 2003 Nov;17(7):703-12
pubmed: 14606735
Man Ther. 2016 Sep;25:56-61
pubmed: 27422598
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 17;11:276
pubmed: 22004560
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170
pubmed: 29550964
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Aug 21;19(1):101
pubmed: 34419076
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Jan;17(1):36-41
pubmed: 30670393