Prelabour rupture of the membranes at term: antibiotic overuse in Italy.


Journal

Minerva obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 2724-6450
Titre abrégé: Minerva Obstet Gynecol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101777346

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jul 2022
Historique:
entrez: 13 7 2022
pubmed: 14 7 2022
medline: 14 7 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The proper management of women with premature rupture of membrane (PROM) and not spontaneously entering in labour remains controversial. The aim of this study was to identify the current management for women with PROM at term according to the Group B Streptococcus (GBS) status across different Italian hospitals. Anonymous online survey evaluating: the current practice of women with PROM in terms of management (expectant management vs. induction of labour) and antibiotic prophylaxis according to GBS status. In case of negative GBS status, the 82.4% of respondents wait until 24 hours before labour induction. Antibiotics are administered for prophylaxis in 35.3%, 27.5% and 2% at 18, 12 and 24 hours respectively. The remaining 35.3% of respondents are divided between those using antibiotics only with signs of infections or according to different risk factors (i.e. meconium-stained amniotic fluid or suspected infection). Neonates born from a mother with negative GBS status almost never (90.2%) receive prophylactic antibiotics. In case of positive GBS status, induction is started as soon as possible by 49.1% of respondents; the remnants choose to wait 6 (15.7%), 12 (17.6%), 18 (3.9%) and 24 (13.7%) hours. Antibiotics are administered as soon as possible by 78.4% of clinicians. In the neonates, 51% of neonatologist administer antibiotics upon clinical indications (suspected sepsis); 15.7% use antibiotics routinely or with a short interval between maternal antibiotics and delivery (17.6%). The management after PROM is highly heterogeneous with an inappropriate extension of antibiotic prophylaxis in cases with negative GBS status.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The proper management of women with premature rupture of membrane (PROM) and not spontaneously entering in labour remains controversial. The aim of this study was to identify the current management for women with PROM at term according to the Group B Streptococcus (GBS) status across different Italian hospitals.
METHODS METHODS
Anonymous online survey evaluating: the current practice of women with PROM in terms of management (expectant management vs. induction of labour) and antibiotic prophylaxis according to GBS status.
RESULTS RESULTS
In case of negative GBS status, the 82.4% of respondents wait until 24 hours before labour induction. Antibiotics are administered for prophylaxis in 35.3%, 27.5% and 2% at 18, 12 and 24 hours respectively. The remaining 35.3% of respondents are divided between those using antibiotics only with signs of infections or according to different risk factors (i.e. meconium-stained amniotic fluid or suspected infection). Neonates born from a mother with negative GBS status almost never (90.2%) receive prophylactic antibiotics. In case of positive GBS status, induction is started as soon as possible by 49.1% of respondents; the remnants choose to wait 6 (15.7%), 12 (17.6%), 18 (3.9%) and 24 (13.7%) hours. Antibiotics are administered as soon as possible by 78.4% of clinicians. In the neonates, 51% of neonatologist administer antibiotics upon clinical indications (suspected sepsis); 15.7% use antibiotics routinely or with a short interval between maternal antibiotics and delivery (17.6%).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The management after PROM is highly heterogeneous with an inappropriate extension of antibiotic prophylaxis in cases with negative GBS status.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35829626
pii: S2724-606X.22.05145-4
doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.22.05145-4
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Filomena G Sileo (FG)

Prenatal Medicine Unit, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, International Doctorate School in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Anna L Tramontano (AL)

Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Alessandra Sponzilli (A)

Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Fabio Facchinetti (F)

Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy - fabio.facchinetti@unimore.it.

Classifications MeSH