Cochlear Implant Electrode Impedance as Potential Biomarker for Residual Hearing.

cochlear health electrode impedance follow-up hearing preservation monitoring hearing threshold impedance telemetry

Journal

Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 28 02 2022
accepted: 31 05 2022
entrez: 14 7 2022
pubmed: 15 7 2022
medline: 15 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Among cochlear implant candidates, an increasing number of patients are presenting with residual acoustic hearing. To monitor the postoperative course of structural and functional preservation of the cochlea, a reliable objective biomarker would be desirable. Recently, impedance telemetry has gained increasing attention in this field. The aim of this study was to investigate the postoperative course of the residual acoustic hearing and clinical impedance in patients with long electrode arrays and to explore the applicability of impedance telemetry for monitoring residual hearing. We retrospectively analyzed records of 42 cochlear implant recipients with residual hearing covering a median postoperative follow-up of 25 months with repeated simultaneous pure tone audiometry and impedance telemetry. We used a linear mixed-effects model to estimate the relation between clinical electrode impedance and residual hearing. Besides the clinical impedance, the follow-up time, side of implantation, gender, and age at implantation were included as fixed effects. An interaction term between impedance and follow-up time, as well as subject-level random intercepts and slopes, were included. Loss of residual hearing occurred either during surgery or within the first 6 post-operative months. Electrode contacts inserted further apically (i.e., deeper) had higher impedances, independent of residual hearing. The highest impedances were measured 1 month postoperatively and gradually decreased over time. Basal electrodes were more likely to maintain higher impedance. Follow-up time was significantly associated with residual hearing. Regardless of the time, we found that a 1 kΩ increase in clinical impedance was associated with a 4.4 dB deterioration of residual hearing ( Pure tone audiometry is the current gold standard for monitoring postoperative residual hearing. However, the association of clinical impedances with residual hearing thresholds found in our study could potentially be exploited for objective monitoring using impedance telemetry. Further analysis including near-field related impedance components could be performed for improved specificity to local immune responses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35832176
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.886171
pmc: PMC9271767
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

886171

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Wimmer, Sclabas, Caversaccio and Weder.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Laryngoscope. 2016 Apr;126(4):962-73
pubmed: 26756395
Hear Res. 2021 Sep 20;:108353
pubmed: 34600798
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Feb;41(2):186-191
pubmed: 31743293
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jun;40(5):e518-e526
pubmed: 31083087
Audiol Neurootol. 2014;19(5):293-309
pubmed: 25277083
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Dec;35(10):1765-72
pubmed: 25133472
Hear Res. 2013 Apr;298:27-35
pubmed: 23396095
Hear Res. 2005 Jul;205(1-2):193-200
pubmed: 15953528
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022 Jan;69(1):129-137
pubmed: 34110987
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 17;10(1):2777
pubmed: 32066743
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011 Aug;120(8):529-34
pubmed: 21922977
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Sep 1;42(8):e1030-e1036
pubmed: 33859138
Laryngoscope. 2021 Dec 9;:
pubmed: 34882792
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 03;11(2):e0147552
pubmed: 26840740
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Oct;37(9):e353-9
pubmed: 27631659
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Mar;41(3):e304-e316
pubmed: 31821256
Audiol Neurootol. 2021;26(1):17-26
pubmed: 32721977
Radiology. 2022 Mar;302(3):605-612
pubmed: 34874202
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2013;(564):3-13
pubmed: 24328756
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 29;383(18):1782-1784
pubmed: 32871061
Ear Hear. 2020 Aug 03;42(1):163-172
pubmed: 32769433
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021 Feb;68(2):545-555
pubmed: 32746052
Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):3-26
pubmed: 23539259
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Apr;33(3):348-54
pubmed: 22377649
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 Feb;23(1):95-118
pubmed: 34686938
Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec;41(6):1560-1567
pubmed: 33136631
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Jun;66(6):1609-1617
pubmed: 30334746
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Jul;41(6):750-757
pubmed: 32150019
Front Digit Health. 2020 Nov 09;2:582562
pubmed: 34713054
Hear Res. 2014 Dec;318:11-7
pubmed: 25285622
Hear Res. 2017 Jul;350:45-57
pubmed: 28432874
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jan 20;:
pubmed: 35048175
Laryngoscope. 2017 Oct;127(10):2352-2357
pubmed: 28304096

Auteurs

Wilhelm Wimmer (W)

Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of ENT-Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Luca Sclabas (L)

Department of ENT-Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Marco Caversaccio (M)

Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of ENT-Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Stefan Weder (S)

Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of ENT-Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH