The procedure and effectiveness of release maneuvers in tracheobronchial resection and reconstruction.
Trachea
anastomosis
release
tracheal tumor
Journal
Translational lung cancer research
ISSN: 2218-6751
Titre abrégé: Transl Lung Cancer Res
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101646875
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
06
01
2022
accepted:
14
06
2022
entrez:
14
7
2022
pubmed:
15
7
2022
medline:
15
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surgical resection and reconstruction are effective and radical treatments for tracheal tumors. Tension-free, well-perfused anastomosis plays a crucial role in postoperative prognosis. The use of various release maneuvers may be required to minimize anastomotic tension. However, the detailed procedures and effectiveness of them are seldomly reported. In the current study, we demonstrated the procedures and advantages of various release maneuvers during tracheal resection and reconstruction. All patients who underwent tracheobronchial resection and reconstruction between January 2019 to December 2021 were included in the study. The patients underwent tracheal release maneuvers, including laryngeal suprahyoid, pericardial, hilar, and inferior pulmonary ligament releasing. The patients' clinical features, surgical procedures, complications and postoperative outcomes were also described. A total of 67 patients received release maneuvers during tracheobronchial surgery. Males accounted for a greater proportion (46/67, 65.7%) of the cohort. The mean age was 44.4 years. Most lesions were located in the thoracic and cervical trachea (21/67 and 17/67, respectively), and 18 cases of carinal (9/67) and bronchial (9/67) lesions were also included. Inferior pulmonary ligament releasing was applied to most noncervical lesion patients (39/67). Two cases of thyroid carcinoma with tracheal invasion received laryngeal suprahyoid release maneuvers. Adenoid cystic carcinoma (26.9%) and squamous cell carcinoma (14.9%) were the most commonly seen malignancies. Postoperative bronchoscopy showed no anastomotic abnormalities, including ischemic change, necrosis, or dehiscence. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days, ranging from 4 to 38 days. In the current study, a patient with postoperative aspiration had the longest hospital stay. In addition, 3 cases of anastomotic stenosis and laryngeal edema were observed. No other maneuver-related complications or particular discomforts were reported during the 6-month follow-up. Anastomosis is the key to successful tracheobronchial resection and reconstruction. Release maneuvers are recommended to facilitate tension-free anastomosis. In addition to simple neck flexion and paratracheal dissection, laryngeal, hilar, and pericardial releasing allow longer trachea to be resected and preservation of well-vascularized anastomosis. The release maneuvers showed acceptable effect and reliable safety without significant morbidity or mortality.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Surgical resection and reconstruction are effective and radical treatments for tracheal tumors. Tension-free, well-perfused anastomosis plays a crucial role in postoperative prognosis. The use of various release maneuvers may be required to minimize anastomotic tension. However, the detailed procedures and effectiveness of them are seldomly reported. In the current study, we demonstrated the procedures and advantages of various release maneuvers during tracheal resection and reconstruction.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
All patients who underwent tracheobronchial resection and reconstruction between January 2019 to December 2021 were included in the study. The patients underwent tracheal release maneuvers, including laryngeal suprahyoid, pericardial, hilar, and inferior pulmonary ligament releasing. The patients' clinical features, surgical procedures, complications and postoperative outcomes were also described.
Results
UNASSIGNED
A total of 67 patients received release maneuvers during tracheobronchial surgery. Males accounted for a greater proportion (46/67, 65.7%) of the cohort. The mean age was 44.4 years. Most lesions were located in the thoracic and cervical trachea (21/67 and 17/67, respectively), and 18 cases of carinal (9/67) and bronchial (9/67) lesions were also included. Inferior pulmonary ligament releasing was applied to most noncervical lesion patients (39/67). Two cases of thyroid carcinoma with tracheal invasion received laryngeal suprahyoid release maneuvers. Adenoid cystic carcinoma (26.9%) and squamous cell carcinoma (14.9%) were the most commonly seen malignancies. Postoperative bronchoscopy showed no anastomotic abnormalities, including ischemic change, necrosis, or dehiscence. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days, ranging from 4 to 38 days. In the current study, a patient with postoperative aspiration had the longest hospital stay. In addition, 3 cases of anastomotic stenosis and laryngeal edema were observed. No other maneuver-related complications or particular discomforts were reported during the 6-month follow-up.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Anastomosis is the key to successful tracheobronchial resection and reconstruction. Release maneuvers are recommended to facilitate tension-free anastomosis. In addition to simple neck flexion and paratracheal dissection, laryngeal, hilar, and pericardial releasing allow longer trachea to be resected and preservation of well-vascularized anastomosis. The release maneuvers showed acceptable effect and reliable safety without significant morbidity or mortality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35832456
doi: 10.21037/tlcr-22-385
pii: tlcr-11-06-1154
pmc: PMC9271432
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1154-1164Informations de copyright
2022 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-22-385/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Br J Surg. 1949 Oct;37(146):202-5, illust
pubmed: 15395088
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Mar;12(3):1184-1193
pubmed: 32274199
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Dec;78(6):1889-96; discussion 1896-7
pubmed: 15560996
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1969 Apr;78(2):285-96
pubmed: 5775394
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001 Mar;19(3):339-45
pubmed: 11251276
Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Jan;49(1):69-77
pubmed: 2153371
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Mar;7(2):306-308
pubmed: 29707510
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1990;4(10):527-32; discussion 533
pubmed: 2245046
Arch Otolaryngol. 1974 Apr;99(4):255-60
pubmed: 4594223
Chest Surg Clin N Am. 2003 May;13(2):201-10
pubmed: 12755309
Thorac Surg Clin. 2018 May;28(2):199-210
pubmed: 29627054
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Mar;9(3):2097-2098
pubmed: 35117563
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003 Oct;112(10):869-76
pubmed: 14587978
Br J Surg. 1950 Oct;38(150):200-5
pubmed: 14791963
Ann Thorac Surg. 1977 Aug;24(2):100-7
pubmed: 327958
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Dec;82(6):1989-97; discussion 1997
pubmed: 17126096
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Jan;117(1):39-52; discussion 52-3
pubmed: 9869757
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Mar;7(2):293-298
pubmed: 29707508
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Mar;109(3):486-92; discussion 492-3
pubmed: 7877309
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1968 Mar;55(3):418-21
pubmed: 5642707