Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture in Renal Colic Caused by Urinary Calculi in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Journal
Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM
ISSN: 1741-427X
Titre abrégé: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101215021
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
23
03
2022
revised:
28
05
2022
accepted:
15
06
2022
entrez:
14
7
2022
pubmed:
15
7
2022
medline:
15
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi has a considerable impact on the quality of life. Pain relief is the primary goal in the management of patients with acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi. At present, there is no systematic evaluation of the efficacy and safety of manual acupuncture in the treatment of acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi in adults. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of manual acupuncture in the treatment of acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi in adults. Databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Medical, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP), and China Biomedical Literature (SinoMed) were searched for literature and other randomized controlled registration platforms. We searched to identify the relevant randomized controlled trials from the establishment of the database to February 9, 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of manual acupuncture as the therapy for acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi in adults were included, whether or not the blind method is used. The patients were adults diagnosed with urinary calculi and renal colic. The control group was treated with commonly used analgesics and antispasmodics. The experimental group was treated with acupuncture as a monotherapy or as an adjuvant therapy (manual acupuncture combined with analgesics and antispasmodics). Two review authors independently assessed titles and abstracts for relevance and extracted data on study design, participants, interventions, and outcomes from potentially relevant articles. Cochrane risk bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included study, and RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Our primary outcomes were response rate and time duration before pain remission. Secondary outcomes were the time of complete pain relief, pain variation, need for rescue analgesia, and adverse events. Out of 1123 records identified, 15 were found to be of relevance to this study, and 1210 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the results shows that, in terms of response rate, compared with the control group, acupuncture as a monotherapy seems to have a slight advantage (RR = 1.10 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.18), In the course of manual acupuncture treatment of acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi in adults, available evidence suggests that manual acupuncture is as effective as positive treatment drugs, either as a monotherapy or as an adjunctive therapy, with the advantage of acupuncture being its rapid onset of action. However, the number of existing clinical studies is small, and the quality of evidence is generally low, so it is recommended to use it with caution. In order to further verify the above conclusions, more high-quality clinical RCTs need to be carried out.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi has a considerable impact on the quality of life. Pain relief is the primary goal in the management of patients with acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi. At present, there is no systematic evaluation of the efficacy and safety of manual acupuncture in the treatment of acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi in adults.
Objective
UNASSIGNED
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of manual acupuncture in the treatment of acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi in adults.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Medical, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP), and China Biomedical Literature (SinoMed) were searched for literature and other randomized controlled registration platforms. We searched to identify the relevant randomized controlled trials from the establishment of the database to February 9, 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of manual acupuncture as the therapy for acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi in adults were included, whether or not the blind method is used. The patients were adults diagnosed with urinary calculi and renal colic. The control group was treated with commonly used analgesics and antispasmodics. The experimental group was treated with acupuncture as a monotherapy or as an adjuvant therapy (manual acupuncture combined with analgesics and antispasmodics). Two review authors independently assessed titles and abstracts for relevance and extracted data on study design, participants, interventions, and outcomes from potentially relevant articles. Cochrane risk bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included study, and RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Our primary outcomes were response rate and time duration before pain remission. Secondary outcomes were the time of complete pain relief, pain variation, need for rescue analgesia, and adverse events.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Out of 1123 records identified, 15 were found to be of relevance to this study, and 1210 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the results shows that, in terms of response rate, compared with the control group, acupuncture as a monotherapy seems to have a slight advantage (RR = 1.10 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.18),
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
In the course of manual acupuncture treatment of acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi in adults, available evidence suggests that manual acupuncture is as effective as positive treatment drugs, either as a monotherapy or as an adjunctive therapy, with the advantage of acupuncture being its rapid onset of action. However, the number of existing clinical studies is small, and the quality of evidence is generally low, so it is recommended to use it with caution. In order to further verify the above conclusions, more high-quality clinical RCTs need to be carried out.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35832526
doi: 10.1155/2022/7140038
pmc: PMC9273390
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
7140038Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Zhicheng Qu et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;(3):CD009234
pubmed: 22419342
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;(1):CD007854
pubmed: 21249697
JAMA. 1998 Nov 11;280(18):1590-5
pubmed: 9820261
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):583-595
pubmed: 29174580
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Aug;19(63):vii-viii, 1-171
pubmed: 26244520
J Pain Res. 2021 Nov 30;14:3637-3648
pubmed: 34876848
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Apr 1;177(4):508-515
pubmed: 28241154
J Pain Res. 2018 Feb 13;11:335-341
pubmed: 29483783
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2017;2017:3837194
pubmed: 29234385
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;51(1):1-5
pubmed: 17913299
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;33(6):749-53
pubmed: 25827597
Trials. 2021 Sep 25;22(1):652
pubmed: 34563246
JAMA. 2005 May 4;293(17):2118-25
pubmed: 15870415
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2012 Nov;32(11):975-8
pubmed: 23213979
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):468-74
pubmed: 26318710
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160
pubmed: 33781993
BMJ. 2005 Aug 13;331(7513):376-82
pubmed: 16055451