[Anatomical fracture endoprosthesis-who and how?]
Anatomische Frakturendoprothese – wer und wie?
Hemiarthroplasty
Humerus
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
Rotator cuff
Shoulder
Journal
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)
ISSN: 2731-703X
Titre abrégé: Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9918384886306676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
accepted:
27
06
2022
pubmed:
15
7
2022
medline:
30
8
2022
entrez:
14
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this review article is to present the indications for an anatomical fracture prosthesis, mostly as a shoulder hemiprosthesis (SHEP) and its value in comparison to other procedures. The healing of the tuberosities in the anatomical position and an intact rotator cuff are particularly important for the successful implantation of a SHEP after proximal humeral fractures. For older patients (> 70 years), the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty achieves more reliable results and is associated with a lower revision rate. The indications for implantation of a SHEP in non-reconstructible proximal humeral fractures, usually with a head split, should be carefully considered and can be used in cases with well-preserved large tuberosities and in younger patients. Complications of SHEP, such as secondary rotator cuff insufficiency, tuberosity dislocation or resorption and secondary glenoid wear, can be treated using a conversion or a change to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Ziel dieses Übersichtsbeitrags ist es, die Indikationen für eine anatomische Frakturendoprothese, meist als Schulterhemiendoprothese (SHEP), sowie ihren Stellenwert im Vergleich zu anderen Verfahren, aufzuzeigen. Für die erfolgreiche Implantation einer SHEP nach proximaler Humerusfraktur (PHF) sind v. a. die Heilung der Tubercula in anatomischer Position und eine intakte Rotatorenmanschette wichtig. Bei älteren Patienten (> 70 Jahre) erzielt die Implantation der inversen Schulterendoprothese (iSTEP) zuverlässigere Ergebnisse und geht mit einer geringeren Revisionsrate einher. Die Indikation zur Implantation einer SHEP bei nichtrekonstruierbaren PHF, meist mit einem „head split“, sollte abgewogen sowie in Fällen mit gut erhaltenen, großen Tubercula und bei jüngeren Patienten in Betracht gezogen werden. Komplikationen der SHEP, wie sekundäre Rotatorenmanschetteninsuffizienz, Tubercula-Dislokation/-Resorption und sekundärer Glenoidverbrauch, können mithilfe einer Konversion oder eines Wechsels auf eine iSTEP behoben werden.
Autres résumés
Type: Publisher
(ger)
Ziel dieses Übersichtsbeitrags ist es, die Indikationen für eine anatomische Frakturendoprothese, meist als Schulterhemiendoprothese (SHEP), sowie ihren Stellenwert im Vergleich zu anderen Verfahren, aufzuzeigen. Für die erfolgreiche Implantation einer SHEP nach proximaler Humerusfraktur (PHF) sind v. a. die Heilung der Tubercula in anatomischer Position und eine intakte Rotatorenmanschette wichtig. Bei älteren Patienten (> 70 Jahre) erzielt die Implantation der inversen Schulterendoprothese (iSTEP) zuverlässigere Ergebnisse und geht mit einer geringeren Revisionsrate einher. Die Indikation zur Implantation einer SHEP bei nichtrekonstruierbaren PHF, meist mit einem „head split“, sollte abgewogen sowie in Fällen mit gut erhaltenen, großen Tubercula und bei jüngeren Patienten in Betracht gezogen werden. Komplikationen der SHEP, wie sekundäre Rotatorenmanschetteninsuffizienz, Tubercula-Dislokation/-Resorption und sekundärer Glenoidverbrauch, können mithilfe einer Konversion oder eines Wechsels auf eine iSTEP behoben werden.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35833975
doi: 10.1007/s00113-022-01212-w
pii: 10.1007/s00113-022-01212-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
ger
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
681-689Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.
Références
Kristiansen B, Barfod G, Bredesen J et al (1987) Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 58(1):75–77
pubmed: 3577743
doi: 10.3109/17453678709146347
Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM (2001) The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72(4):365–371
pubmed: 11580125
doi: 10.1080/000164701753542023
Wang J, Zhu Y, Zhang F, Chen W, Tian Y, Zhang Y (2016) Meta-analysis suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humerus fractures is a better option than hemiarthroplasty in the elderly. Int Orthop 40(3):531–539
pubmed: 26105763
doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2811-x
Lädermann A, Chiu JC‑H, Collin P, Piotton S, Nover L, Scheibel M (2019) Hemi- vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. Obere Extrem 14(2):127–135
doi: 10.1007/s11678-019-0507-3
Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J (2006) Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:87–92
pubmed: 16394745
doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000194672.79634.78
Davey MS, Hurley ET, Anil U et al (2022) Management options for proximal humerus fractures—A systematic review & network meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Injury 53(2):244–249
pubmed: 34974908
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.12.022
Brunner U (2014) Primäre Prothetik: Wann und welche? In: Lill H, Scheibel M, Voigt C (Hrsg) Die proximale Humerusfraktur. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, S 134–152
Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement GD (2009) Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(7):1689–1697
pubmed: 19571092
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00133
Schnetzke MG, Grützner P‑A, Gühring T (2015) Versorgungsstrategien von osteoprotischen proximalen Humerusfrakturen. OUP 11:555–562
Baudi P, Campochiaro G, Serafini F et al (2014) Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparative study of functional and radiological outcomes in the treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture. Musculoskelet Surg 98(Suppl 1):19–25
pubmed: 24659199
doi: 10.1007/s12306-014-0322-3
Boyle MJ, Youn SM, Frampton CM, Ball CM (2013) Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(1):32–37
pubmed: 22652065
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.006
Cuff DJ, Pupello DR (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(22):2050–2055
pubmed: 24257664
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01637
Shukla DR, McAnany S, Kim J, Overley S, Parsons BO (2016) Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25(2):330–340
pubmed: 26644230
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.08.030
Dillon MT, Prentice HA, Burfeind WE, Chan PH, Navarro RA (2019) The increasing role of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Injury 50(3):676–680
pubmed: 30738568
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.01.034
Boileau P, Winter M, Cikes A et al (2013) Can surgeons predict what makes a good hemiarthroplasty for fracture? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(11):1495–1506
pubmed: 23834993
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.04.018
Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L (2009) Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95(1):48–55
pubmed: 19251237
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2008.09.002
Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M (2004) Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13(4):427–433
pubmed: 15220884
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.034
Scheibel M, Peters P, Moro F, Moroder P (2019) Head-split fractures of the proximal humerus. Obere Extrem 14(2):93–102
doi: 10.1007/s11678-019-0520-6
Bastian JD, Hertel R (2008) Initial post-fracture humeral head ischemia does not predict development of necrosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(1):2–8
pubmed: 18308202
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.03.026
Gerber C, Hersche O, Berberat C (1998) The clinical relevance of posttraumatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7(6):586–590
pubmed: 9883418
doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90005-2
Greiwe RM, Vargas-Ariza R, Bigliani LU, Levine WN, Ahmad CS (2013) Hemiarthoplasty for head-split fractures of the proximal humerus. Orthopedics 36(7):905–911
doi: 10.3928/01477447-20130624-21
Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Mole D (2002) Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(5):401–412
pubmed: 12378157
doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.124527
Reuther F, Muhlhausler B, Wahl D, Nijs S (2010) Functional outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures: A multicentre analysis. Injury 41(6):606–612
pubmed: 20116058
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.11.019
Agorastides I, Sinopidis C, El Meligy M, Yin Q, Brownson P, Frostick SP (2007) Early versus late mobilization after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16(3 Suppl):S33–S38
pubmed: 17174113
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.07.004
Robinson C, Page M, Hill RS, Sanders DL, Court-Brown CM, Wakefield AE (2003) Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(7):1215–1223
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200307000-00006
Valenti P, Aliani D, Maroun C, Werthel JD, Elkolti K (2017) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes at midterm follow-up: a series of 51 patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27(3):309–315
pubmed: 28349211
doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-1927-7
Yahuaca BI, Simon P, Christmas KN et al (2020) Acute surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: ORIF vs. hemiarthroplasty vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 29(7S):S32–S40
pubmed: 31948835
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.012
Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M, Farrell E, Menth-Chiari W, Lajtai G, Hübner C, Resch H (2004) Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86-B(2):217–219
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.14553
Hashiguchi H, Iwashita S, Ohkubo A, Takai S (2015) The outcome of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures is dependent on the status of the rotator cuff. Int Orthop 39(6):1115–1119
pubmed: 25864089
doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2758-y
Frankle MA, Greenwald DP, Markee BA, Ondrovic LE, Lee WE 3rd (2001) Biomechanical effects of malposition of tuberosity fragments on the humeral prosthetic reconstruction for four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10(4):321–326
pubmed: 11517361
doi: 10.1067/mse.2001.113962
Frankle MA, Ondrovic LE, Markee BA, Harris ML, Lee WE 3rd (2002) Stability of tuberosity reattachment in proximal humeral hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(5):413–420
pubmed: 12378158
doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.126098
Krause FG, Huebschle L, Hertel R (2007) Reattachment of the tuberosities with cable and bone graft in hemiathroplasties done for proximal humeral fractures with cable wire and bone graft: 58 patients with a 22-month minimum follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 21(10):682–686
pubmed: 17986884
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815917e0
Dietz SO, Broos P, Nijs S (2012) Suture fixation versus cable cerclage of the tuberosities in shoulder arthroplasty-clinical and radiologic results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(6):793–800
pubmed: 22323058
doi: 10.1007/s00402-012-1470-2
Pijls BG, Werner PH, Eggen PJ (2010) Alternative humeral tubercle fixation in shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(2):282–289
pubmed: 19748800
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.018
Fleischer J, Schleyer A, Nassutt R, Grittner U, Ojodu I, Hopp SJ (2017) Biomechanical strength and failure mechanism of different tubercula refixation methods within the framework of an arthroplasty for shoulder fracture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(2):165–169
pubmed: 28093375
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.12.001
Torrens C, Corrales M, Melendo E, Solano A, Rodriguez-Baeza A, Caceres E (2008) The pectoralis major tendon as a reference for restoring humeral length and retroversion with hemiarthroplasty for fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17(6):947–950
pubmed: 18774736
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.05.041
Soliman OA, Koptan WM (2013) Proximal humeral fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty: does tenodesis of the long head of the biceps improve results? Injury 44(4):461–464
pubmed: 23063703
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.09.012
Li F, Zhu Y, Lu Y, Liu X, Wu G, Jiang C (2014) Hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures: does a trabecular metal prosthesis make a difference? A prospective, comparative study with a minimum 3‑year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(10):1437–1443
pubmed: 25220197
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.017
Loew M, Heitkemper S, Parsch D, Schneider S, Rickert M (2006) Influence of the design of the prosthesis on the outcome after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in displaced fractures of the head of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88-B(3):345–350
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B3.16909
Krishnan SG, Reineck JR, Bennion PD, Feher L, Burkhead WZ Jr (2011) Shoulder arthroplasty for fracture: does a fracture-specific stem make a difference? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(12):3317–3323
pubmed: 21598120
pmcid: 3210275
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1919-6
Kontakis GM, Tosounidis TI, Christoforakis Z, Hadjipavlou AG (2009) Early management of complex proximal humeral fractures using the Aequalis fracture prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91-B(10):1335–1340
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B10.22473
Singh A, Padilla M, Nyberg EM, Mirzayan R, Yian EH, Navarro RA (2017) Cement technique correlates with tuberosity healing in hemiparthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 26(3):437–442
pubmed: 27727056
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.08.003
Esen E, Doğramacı Y, Gültekin S, Suluova F (2009) Factors affecting results of patients with humeral proximal end fractures undergoing primary hemiarthroplasty: A retrospective study in 42 patients. Injury 40(12):1336–1341
pubmed: 19595326
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.06.019
Boileau P, Chuinard C, Le Huec JC, Walch G, Trojani C (2006) Proximal humerus fracture sequelae: impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:121–130
pubmed: 16394750
doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000195679.87258.6e
Amirfeyz R, Sarangi P (2008) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fracture with a conservative rehabilitation regime. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(9):985–988
pubmed: 18458923
doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0646-2
Boyer E, Menu G, Loisel F et al (2017) Cementless and locked prosthesis for the treatment of 3‑part and 4‑part proximal humerus fractures: prospective clinical evaluation of hemi- and reverse arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27(3):301–308
pubmed: 28238043
doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-1926-8
Sebastia-Forcada E, Cebrian-Gomez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Gil-Guillen V (2014) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(10):1419–1426
pubmed: 25086490
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.035
Neumann MV, Jaeger M, Südkamp NP (2017) Komplexe proximale Humerusfrakturen. Trauma Berufskrankh 19(S2):170–176
doi: 10.1007/s10039-017-0288-0
DiGiovanni J, Marra G, Park JY, Bigliani LU (1998) Hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis with massive rotator cuff tears. Orthop Clin North Am 29(3):477–489
pubmed: 9706294
doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70023-7
Dezfuli B, King JJ, Farmer KW, Struk AM, Wright TW (2016) Outcomes of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as primary versus revision procedure for proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25(7):1133–1137
pubmed: 26897312
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.002
Favard L, Levigne C, Nerot C, Gerber C, De Wilde L, Mole D (2011) Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(9):2469–2475
pubmed: 21384212
pmcid: 3148361
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1833-y
Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J (2011) Hemiarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 4‑part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(7):1025–1033
pubmed: 21783385
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.016
Plausinis D, Kwon Y, Zuckermann JD (2005) Complications of humeral head replacement for proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87-A(1):204–213
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200501000-00031
McBride AP, Ross M, Hoy G et al (2022) Mid-term outcomes of pyrolytic carbon humeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty compared with metal humeral resurfacing and metal stemmed hemiarthroplasty for osteoarthritis in young patients: analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 31(4):755–762
pubmed: 34555523
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.017