The Economic Benefit of Remission for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Cost of care
Disease activity
Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors
bDMARDs
csDMARDs
tsDMARDs
Journal
Rheumatology and therapy
ISSN: 2198-6576
Titre abrégé: Rheumatol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101674543
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
12
04
2022
accepted:
15
06
2022
pubmed:
15
7
2022
medline:
15
7
2022
entrez:
14
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), attaining remission or low disease activity (LDA), as recommended by the treat-to-target approach, has shown to yield improvement in symptoms and quality of life. However, limited evidence from real-world settings is available to support the premise that better disease control is associated with lower healthcare costs. This study fills in evidence gaps regarding the cost of care by RA disease activity (DA) states and by therapy. This retrospective cohort study linked medical and prescription claims from Optum Clinformatics Data Mart to electronic health record data from Illumination Health over 1/1/2010-3/31/2020. Mean annual costs for payers and patients were examined, stratifying on DA state and baseline use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), biologics, and targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs. Subgroup analysis examining within-person change in costs pre- and post-initiation of new therapy was also performed. Descriptive statistics, means, and boot-strapped confidence intervals were analyzed by DA state and by RA therapy. Furthermore, multivariate negative binomial regression analysis adjusting for key baseline characteristics was conducted. Of 2339 eligible patients, 19% were in remission, 40% in LDA, 29% in moderate DA (MDA), and 12% in high DA (HDA) at baseline. Mean annual costs during follow-up were substantially less for patients in remission ($40,072) versus those in MDA ($56,536) and HDA ($59,217). For patients in remission, csDMARD use was associated with the lowest mean annual cost ($25,575), tsDMARD was highest ($75,512), and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) ($69,846) and non-TNFi ($57,507) were intermediate. Among new TNFi (n = 137) and non-TNFi initiators (n = 107), 31% and 26% attained LDA/remission, respectively, and the time to achieve remission/LDA was numerically shorter in TNFi vs. non-TNFi initiators. For those on biologics, mean annual within-person medical and inpatient costs were lower after achieving LDA/remission, although pharmacy costs were higher. Cost of care increased with increasing DA state, with patients in remission having the lowest costs. Optimizing DA has the potential for substantial savings in healthcare costs, although may be partially offset by the high cost of targeted RA therapies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35834162
doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00473-6
pii: 10.1007/s40744-022-00473-6
pmc: PMC9510082
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1329-1345Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107
pubmed: 19757444
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jan;26(1):77-90
pubmed: 19908947
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;69(3):518-528
pubmed: 27696724
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1316-22
pubmed: 24550173
Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 May 15;19(1):92
pubmed: 28506320
J Rheumatol Suppl. 2011 Nov;88:55-61
pubmed: 22045980
Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Sep;8(3):1159-1176
pubmed: 34148193
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 May;73(5):759-768
pubmed: 33205906
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Oct;70(10):1431-1438
pubmed: 29316377
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Oct;72(10):1664-8
pubmed: 23117244
BMJ. 2016 Apr 21;353:i1777
pubmed: 27102806
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):771-777
pubmed: 32245893
Clin Rheumatol. 2018 Apr;37(4):885-893
pubmed: 29224127
Adv Ther. 2021 May;38(5):2558-2570
pubmed: 33837497
Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Feb 21;16(1):R56
pubmed: 24555808
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Dec;32(12):1959-1967
pubmed: 27558077
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;38(10):2717-2726
pubmed: 31134504
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;38(10):2727-2736
pubmed: 31161488
Int J Rheum Dis. 2016 Nov;19(11):1132-1142
pubmed: 26354025
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Dec;71(12):1540-1555
pubmed: 31709779
Clin Ther. 2014 Jul 1;36(7):996-1004
pubmed: 25012729
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5 Suppl 39):S100-8
pubmed: 16273793
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):310-319
pubmed: 28028867
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 08;5:CD012657
pubmed: 28481462
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Jul;73(7):1108-1123
pubmed: 34101376
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Sep;37(9):1551-1557
pubmed: 28455559
Adv Ther. 2022 Jan;39(1):75-93
pubmed: 34787822