Evaluation of denoising digital breast tomosynthesis data in both projection and image domains and a study of noise model on digital breast tomosynthesis image domain.

Burr distribution Gaussian noise Poisson noise digital breast tomosynthesis double denoising noise model

Journal

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
ISSN: 2329-4302
Titre abrégé: J Med Imaging (Bellingham)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101643461

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
received: 01 10 2018
accepted: 29 01 2019
entrez: 14 7 2022
pubmed: 1 7 2019
medline: 1 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is an imaging technique created to visualize 3-D mammary structures for the purpose of diagnosing breast cancer. This imaging technique is based on the principle of computed tomography. Due to the use of a dangerous ionizing radiation, the "as low as reasonably achievable" (ALARA) principle should be respected, aiming at minimizing the radiation dose to obtain an adequate examination. Thus, a noise filtering method is a fundamental step to achieve the ALARA principle, as the noise level of the image increases as the radiation dose is reduced, making it difficult to analyze the image. In our work, a double denoising approach for DBT is proposed, filtering in both projection (prereconstruction) and image (postreconstruction) domains. First, in the prefiltering step, methods were used for filtering the Poisson noise. To reconstruct the DBT projections, we used the filtered backprojection algorithm. Then, in the postfiltering step, methods were used for filtering Gaussian noise. Experiments were performed on simulated data generated by open virtual clinical trials (OpenVCT) software and on a physical phantom, using several combinations of methods in each domain. Our results showed that double filtering (i.e., in both domains) is not superior to filtering in projection domain only. By investigating the possible reason to explain these results, it was found that the noise model in DBT image domain could be better modeled by a Burr distribution than a Gaussian distribution. Finally, this important contribution can open a research direction in the DBT denoising problem.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35834318
doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.3.031410
pii: 18222SSR
pmc: PMC6381383
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

031410

Informations de copyright

© 2019 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Références

Radiology. 1997 Nov;205(2):399-406
pubmed: 9356620
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1985 Feb;7(2):165-77
pubmed: 21869255
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2007 Aug;16(8):2080-95
pubmed: 17688213
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2013 Dec;22(12):5226-37
pubmed: 24108465
Biomed Eng Online. 2014 May 27;13:65
pubmed: 24886602

Auteurs

Daniele Cristina Scarparo (DC)

São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Geosciences and Exact Sciences, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.

Denis Henrique Pinheiro Salvadeo (DHP)

São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Geosciences and Exact Sciences, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.
University of Pennsylvania, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Daniel Carlos Guimarães Pedronette (DCG)

São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Geosciences and Exact Sciences, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil.

Bruno Barufaldi (B)

University of Pennsylvania, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Andrew Douglas Arnold Maidment (ADA)

University of Pennsylvania, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Classifications MeSH