Ward based goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) in acute pancreatitis (GAP) trial: A feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Acute pancreatitis Cardiac output Fluid therapy Goal-directed fluid therapy

Journal

International journal of surgery (London, England)
ISSN: 1743-9159
Titre abrégé: Int J Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101228232

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 21 02 2022
revised: 13 06 2022
accepted: 14 06 2022
pubmed: 15 7 2022
medline: 31 8 2022
entrez: 14 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) reduces complications in patients undergoing major general surgery. There are no reports of cardiac output evaluation being used to optimise the fluid administration for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) in a general surgery ward. 50 patients with AP were randomised to either ward-based GDFT (n = 25) with intravenous (IV) fluids administered based on stroke volume optimisation protocol or standard care (SC) (n = 25), but with blinded cardiac output evaluation, for 48-h following hospital admission. Primary outcome was feasibility. 50 of 116 eligible patients (43.1%) were recruited over 20 months demonstrating feasibility. 36 (72%) completed the 48-h of GDFT; 10 (20%) discharged within 48-h and 4 withdrawals (3 GDFT, 1 SC). Baseline characteristics were similar with only 3 participants having severe disease (6%, 1 GDFT, 2 SC). Similar volumes of IV fluids were administered in both groups (GDFT 5465 (1839) ml, SC 5211 (1745) ml). GDFT group had a lower heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate and improved oxygen saturations. GDFT was not associated with any harms. There was no evidence of difference in complications of AP (GDFT 24%, SC 32%) or in the duration of stay in intensive care (GDFT 0 (0), SC 0.7 (3) days). Length of hospital stay was 5 (2.9) days in GDFT and 6.3 (7.6) in SC groups. Ward-based GDFT is feasible and shows a signal of possible efficacy in AP in this early-stage study. A larger multi-site RCT is required to confirm clinical and cost effectiveness.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) reduces complications in patients undergoing major general surgery. There are no reports of cardiac output evaluation being used to optimise the fluid administration for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) in a general surgery ward.
METHOD METHODS
50 patients with AP were randomised to either ward-based GDFT (n = 25) with intravenous (IV) fluids administered based on stroke volume optimisation protocol or standard care (SC) (n = 25), but with blinded cardiac output evaluation, for 48-h following hospital admission. Primary outcome was feasibility.
RESULTS RESULTS
50 of 116 eligible patients (43.1%) were recruited over 20 months demonstrating feasibility. 36 (72%) completed the 48-h of GDFT; 10 (20%) discharged within 48-h and 4 withdrawals (3 GDFT, 1 SC). Baseline characteristics were similar with only 3 participants having severe disease (6%, 1 GDFT, 2 SC). Similar volumes of IV fluids were administered in both groups (GDFT 5465 (1839) ml, SC 5211 (1745) ml). GDFT group had a lower heart rate, blood pressure and respiratory rate and improved oxygen saturations. GDFT was not associated with any harms. There was no evidence of difference in complications of AP (GDFT 24%, SC 32%) or in the duration of stay in intensive care (GDFT 0 (0), SC 0.7 (3) days). Length of hospital stay was 5 (2.9) days in GDFT and 6.3 (7.6) in SC groups.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Ward-based GDFT is feasible and shows a signal of possible efficacy in AP in this early-stage study. A larger multi-site RCT is required to confirm clinical and cost effectiveness.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35835346
pii: S1743-9191(22)00514-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106737
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106737

Investigateurs

Jonathan Costello (J)
Dimitris Tzelis (D)
Christine Eastgate (C)
Maria Jose Ciaponi (MJ)
Margaret McNeil (M)
Sara Mingo Garcia (SM)
Glykeria Pakou (G)
Otto Schwalowsky-Monks (O)
Gretchelle Asis (G)
Atokoleka Osakanu (A)
Rebekkah Troller (R)
Nikolaos Dimitrokallis (N)
Stephanos Pericleous (S)
Amjad Khalil (A)
Aliza Abeles (A)
Charles Rees (C)
Khalid Abdulkareem (K)
Mavroudis Voultsos (M)

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Farid Froghi (F)

UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK; General and Emergency Surgery Department, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK. Electronic address: farid.froghi@nhs.net.

Fiammetta Soggiu (F)

UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

Federico Ricciardi (F)

Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.

Cecilia Vindrola-Padros (C)

Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London, London, UK.

Lefteris Floros (L)

PHMR, Health Economics, Pricing & Reimbursement, London, UK.

Daniel Martin (D)

UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK; Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Helder Filipe (H)

Intensive Care Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

Massimo Varcada (M)

UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK; General and Emergency Surgery Department, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

Kurinchi Gurusamy (K)

UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

Satya Bhattacharya (S)

Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Royal London Hospital, London, UK.

Angela Fanshawe (A)

General and Emergency Surgery Department, Barnet General Hospital, London, UK.

Bogdan Delcea (B)

General and Emergency Surgery Department, Barnet General Hospital, London, UK.

Pawan Mathur (P)

General and Emergency Surgery Department, Barnet General Hospital, London, UK.

Brian Davidson (B)

UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK; General and Emergency Surgery Department, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH