Efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) in older adult patients (≥80 years) with primary colorectal cancer.
Colorectal cancer
conventional laparotomy (CL)
hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS)
older adult patients
surgical treatment
Journal
Journal of gastrointestinal oncology
ISSN: 2078-6891
Titre abrégé: J Gastrointest Oncol
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101557751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
08
12
2021
accepted:
13
04
2022
entrez:
15
7
2022
pubmed:
16
7
2022
medline:
16
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
From 2004 to 2014, 821 colorectal cancer primary resections were conducted at our institution. Of these, 102 patients (12.4%) were older adults over 80 years old. underwent either the conventional laparotomy group (72 patients) or the hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) group (30 patients). Data were extracted for 102 patients over 80 years old who underwent primary resection for colorectal cancer and were divided into two groups: conventional laparotomy (CL) (n=72) and hand-assisted laparoscopy (n=30). Pre-operative characteristics and outcomes were compared. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for age: CL group median 83.5 years old (range, 80-92 years old) and hand-assisted laparoscopy (HALS) group median 81.5 years old (range, 80-88 years old) (P=0.027). Pre-operative cardiac and lung function risk, performance status, and pathological classification stage (pStage) were almost similar between groups (P=0.668, P=0.176, P>0.999, P=0.217). No significant differences were found for operation time. The HALS group resulted in less blood loss (median 204 mL in the CL group and median 68 mL in the HALS group, P=0.003), shorter postoperative hospital stay (median was 18 days in the CL group and median was 12 days in the HALS group, P<0.001), and fewer postoperative wound infections (18 cases in the CL group and 2 cases in the HALS group, P=0.034). Five-year relapse-free survival (5Y-RFS) was 48.1% in the CL group and 73.3% in the HALS group (P=0.028). Five-year overall survival (5Y-OS) was 48.2% in the CL group and 73.3% in the HALS group (P=0.027). Approximately 70% of surgical treatment for patients over 80 years old with colorectal carcinoma were performed by CL. However, HALS had significant advantages including less blood loss, fewer wound infections, and shorter hospital stays. Therefore, HALS could proactively be considered to older adult patients with colorectal cancer.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
From 2004 to 2014, 821 colorectal cancer primary resections were conducted at our institution. Of these, 102 patients (12.4%) were older adults over 80 years old. underwent either the conventional laparotomy group (72 patients) or the hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) group (30 patients).
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Data were extracted for 102 patients over 80 years old who underwent primary resection for colorectal cancer and were divided into two groups: conventional laparotomy (CL) (n=72) and hand-assisted laparoscopy (n=30). Pre-operative characteristics and outcomes were compared.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for age: CL group median 83.5 years old (range, 80-92 years old) and hand-assisted laparoscopy (HALS) group median 81.5 years old (range, 80-88 years old) (P=0.027). Pre-operative cardiac and lung function risk, performance status, and pathological classification stage (pStage) were almost similar between groups (P=0.668, P=0.176, P>0.999, P=0.217). No significant differences were found for operation time. The HALS group resulted in less blood loss (median 204 mL in the CL group and median 68 mL in the HALS group, P=0.003), shorter postoperative hospital stay (median was 18 days in the CL group and median was 12 days in the HALS group, P<0.001), and fewer postoperative wound infections (18 cases in the CL group and 2 cases in the HALS group, P=0.034). Five-year relapse-free survival (5Y-RFS) was 48.1% in the CL group and 73.3% in the HALS group (P=0.028). Five-year overall survival (5Y-OS) was 48.2% in the CL group and 73.3% in the HALS group (P=0.027).
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Approximately 70% of surgical treatment for patients over 80 years old with colorectal carcinoma were performed by CL. However, HALS had significant advantages including less blood loss, fewer wound infections, and shorter hospital stays. Therefore, HALS could proactively be considered to older adult patients with colorectal cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35837154
doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-838
pii: jgo-13-03-1073
pmc: PMC9274078
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1073-1080Informations de copyright
2022 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jgo.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jgo-21-838/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 May 7;21(17):5158-66
pubmed: 25954089
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Sep;32(9):1237-1242
pubmed: 28667498
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Nov 4;20(1):445
pubmed: 33148215
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Mar;34(3):377-386
pubmed: 30649570
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Oct 13;15:1939-1949
pubmed: 33116448
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Dec;16(12):976-83
pubmed: 25331635
Oncol Lett. 2011 Sep 1;2(5):801-805
pubmed: 22866130
Oncol Lett. 2017 Jun;13(6):4953-4958
pubmed: 28588735
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Jan;13(1):7-18
pubmed: 31828925
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;2(4):261-268
pubmed: 28404155
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Jun;30(3):249-256
pubmed: 32049871
Surg Today. 2014 Oct;44(10):1834-40
pubmed: 24121951
Oncol Rep. 2010 Jul;24(1):25-30
pubmed: 20514440
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Mar 11;2018:2176056
pubmed: 29713641
Oncol Rep. 2009 Oct;22(4):893-9
pubmed: 19724870
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec 7;16(45):5662-8
pubmed: 21128315