Nitrogenous Fertilizer Coated With Zinc Improves the Productivity and Grain Quality of Rice Grown Under Anaerobic Conditions.

anaerobic regimes coated urea growth nitrogen rice yield

Journal

Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 07 04 2022
accepted: 02 05 2022
entrez: 15 7 2022
pubmed: 16 7 2022
medline: 16 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

An ample quantity of water and sufficient nutrients are required for economical rice production to meet the challenges of ever-increasing food demand. Currently, slow-release nitrogenous fertilizers for efficient inputs utilization and maximum economic yield of field crops are in the limelight for researchers and farmers. In this study, we evaluated the comparative efficacy of conventional urea and coated urea (zinc and neem) on rice grown under aerobic and anaerobic regimes in greenhouse conditions. For the aerobic regime, field capacity was maintained at 80-100% to keep the soil aerated. On the other hand, for the anaerobic regime, pots were covered with a polythene sheet throughout the experimentation to create flooded conditions. All forms of urea, conventional and coated (zinc and neem), improved plant growth, gas exchange, yield, yield contributing parameters, and quality characteristics of rice crop. However, better performance in all attributes was found in the case of zinc-coated urea. Gas exchange attributes (photosynthetic rate, 30%, and stomatal conductance 24%), yield parameters like plant height (29%), tillers per plant (38%), spikelets per spike (31%), grains per panicle (42%), total biomass (53%), and grain yield (45%) were recorded to be maximum in rice plants treated with zinc-coated urea. The highest grain and straw nitrogen contents, grain protein contents, and grain water absorption ratio were also found in plants with zinc-coated urea applications. In irrigation practices, the anaerobic regime was found to be more responsive compared to the aerobic regime regarding rice growth, productivity, and quality traits. Thus, to enhance the productivity and quality of rice grown in anaerobic conditions, zinc-coated urea is best suited as it is more responsive when compared to other forms of urea.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35837462
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.914653
pmc: PMC9274167
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

914653

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Wahid, Irshad, Irshad, Khan, Hasnain, Ibrar, Khan, Saleem, Bashir, Alotaibi, Matloob, Farooq, Ismail and Cheema.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2011 Jul;32(7):1908-15
pubmed: 21922808
J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2019;65(Supplement):S2-S3
pubmed: 31619630
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 24;13:851099
pubmed: 35401616
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2007 May 15;57(1):1-7
pubmed: 17287112
Rice (N Y). 2015 Feb 10;8:9
pubmed: 25844114
J Exp Bot. 2010 Jul;61(12):3177-89
pubmed: 20421195
Front Plant Sci. 2022 May 16;13:890181
pubmed: 35651778
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Sep 30;7:1496
pubmed: 27746809
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:302179
pubmed: 24895563
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Dec;24(35):27601-27612
pubmed: 28980120
Plants (Basel). 2022 Jan 19;11(3):
pubmed: 35161240
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Apr 29;13:877544
pubmed: 35574130
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Jun;28(6):3578-3584
pubmed: 34121901
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 16;13:862088
pubmed: 35371129
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Apr;24(12):11722-11733
pubmed: 28332086
Plant J. 2006 Nov;48(3):427-39
pubmed: 17010114
J Control Release. 2016 Mar 10;225:109-20
pubmed: 26809006
J Integr Plant Biol. 2009 Jan;51(1):45-51
pubmed: 19166493

Auteurs

Muhammad Ashfaq Wahid (MA)

Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Muhammad Irshad (M)

Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Sohail Irshad (S)

Department of Agronomy, MNS-University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.

Shahbaz Khan (S)

National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Zuhair Hasnain (Z)

Department of Agronomy, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Danish Ibrar (D)

National Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Afroz Rais Khan (AR)

Department of Botany, Sardar Bahadur Khan Women's University, Quetta, Pakistan.

Muhammad Farrukh Saleem (MF)

Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Saqib Bashir (S)

Department of Soil and Environmental Science, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan.

Saqer S Alotaibi (SS)

Department of Biotechnology, College of Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Amar Matloob (A)

Department of Agronomy, MNS-University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.

Naila Farooq (N)

University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.

Muhammad Shoaib Ismail (MS)

Department of Agronomy, MNS-University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan.

Mumtaz Akhtar Cheema (MA)

Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
School of Science and the Environment, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Corner Brook, NL, Canada.

Classifications MeSH