Single-Item Happiness Measure Features Adequate Validity Among Adolescents.

bullying happiness health complaints social support validity violence well-being

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 26 02 2022
accepted: 12 05 2022
entrez: 15 7 2022
pubmed: 16 7 2022
medline: 16 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Happiness is becoming increasingly relevant in recent research, including adolescents. Many studies are using the single-item measure for adolescent happiness, however, its validity is not well known. We aimed to examine the validity of this measure among adolescents in three countries from distinct European regions - Eastern (Lithuania), Southern (Portugal), and Western (Scotland). The analysis included data from Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study from three countries and three last surveys (2009/10, 2013/14, and 2017/18). The total sample comprised 47,439 schoolchildren. For validity, the indicators reflecting subjective health, life satisfaction, quality of life, well-being, social support, health complaints, bullying, and self-directed violence were assessed. The calculations were conducted in the total sample and by gender, age, survey year, and country. The different indicators of concurrent and convergent validity revealed consistent correlations with happiness, with better well-being, health, and subjective perceptions being related to higher happiness. Meanwhile, health complaints, bullying behaviors, and self-directed violence were related to lower happiness. The subgroup differences were consistent across gender, age groups, countries, and survey rounds. The extent of differences was more expressed among girls. The single item for adolescent happiness measurement features a consistent pattern of validity concerning indicators of concurrent and convergent validity. Higher self-reported happiness is associated with better mental and physical health and well-being, and less expressed negative factors (complaints, bullying, and self-directed violence). In addition, among girls the correlations tend to be stronger than boys.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Happiness is becoming increasingly relevant in recent research, including adolescents. Many studies are using the single-item measure for adolescent happiness, however, its validity is not well known. We aimed to examine the validity of this measure among adolescents in three countries from distinct European regions - Eastern (Lithuania), Southern (Portugal), and Western (Scotland).
Materials and Methods UNASSIGNED
The analysis included data from Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study from three countries and three last surveys (2009/10, 2013/14, and 2017/18). The total sample comprised 47,439 schoolchildren. For validity, the indicators reflecting subjective health, life satisfaction, quality of life, well-being, social support, health complaints, bullying, and self-directed violence were assessed. The calculations were conducted in the total sample and by gender, age, survey year, and country.
Results UNASSIGNED
The different indicators of concurrent and convergent validity revealed consistent correlations with happiness, with better well-being, health, and subjective perceptions being related to higher happiness. Meanwhile, health complaints, bullying behaviors, and self-directed violence were related to lower happiness. The subgroup differences were consistent across gender, age groups, countries, and survey rounds. The extent of differences was more expressed among girls.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The single item for adolescent happiness measurement features a consistent pattern of validity concerning indicators of concurrent and convergent validity. Higher self-reported happiness is associated with better mental and physical health and well-being, and less expressed negative factors (complaints, bullying, and self-directed violence). In addition, among girls the correlations tend to be stronger than boys.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35837634
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.884520
pmc: PMC9274985
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

884520

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00022/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Lukoševičiūtė, Gariepy, Mabelis, Gaspar, Joffė-Luinienė and Šmigelskas.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2015 Mar 10;4(1):e19663
pubmed: 25883916
J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 1;173:163-9
pubmed: 25462412
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 12;6:1176
pubmed: 26321990
Nurs Health Sci. 2015 Mar;17(1):119-125
pubmed: 24943997
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;53(7):647-662
pubmed: 29752493
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 Feb;23(2):72-82
pubmed: 31977251
Int J Nurs Pract. 2003 Jun;9(3):166-75
pubmed: 12801248
Psychol Rep. 2020 Aug;123(4):1064-1082
pubmed: 31033417
J Adolesc. 2001 Oct;24(5):611-24
pubmed: 11676508
CMAJ. 2020 Feb 10;192(6):E136-E141
pubmed: 32041697
Child Indic Res. 2018;11(6):1951-1965
pubmed: 30524519
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:339-359
pubmed: 30601719
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 10;15(7):e0235834
pubmed: 32649690
Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 08;9(2):
pubmed: 35204948
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Oct 1;27(5):879-885
pubmed: 28957478
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 10;15(5):
pubmed: 29747476
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018 Jan-Apr;18(1):60-68
pubmed: 30487911
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Dec;58(12):997-1003
pubmed: 15547059
J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7
pubmed: 2280326
J Adolesc. 2011 Aug;34(4):639-52
pubmed: 21168202
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Dec;47(12):2584-2595
pubmed: 30039509

Auteurs

Justė Lukoševičiūtė (J)

Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Faculty of Public Health, Research Institute, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Geneviève Gariepy (G)

Public Health Agency of Canada, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Judith Mabelis (J)

Medical Research Council, Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Tania Gaspar (T)

CLISSIS, Psychology and Educational Sciences Institute, Universidade Lusíada, Lisbon, Portugal.

Roza Joffė-Luinienė (R)

Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Kastytis Šmigelskas (K)

Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Public Health, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Faculty of Public Health, Research Institute, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Classifications MeSH