The usefulness of YouTube videos as a source of information in asthma.

YouTube allergy asthma digital health patient education

Journal

The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma
ISSN: 1532-4303
Titre abrégé: J Asthma
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8106454

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 16 7 2022
medline: 28 3 2023
entrez: 15 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patient education is a key element in the management of asthma. This study aimed to evaluate the popularity and usefulness of YouTube videos on asthma. Two authors screened and evaluated the 200 most popular videos. Data on likes, dislikes, views, comment, source of uploader, days since upload, and usefulness were recorded and included for analyses. The usefulness of the videos was categorized as follows: A total of 130 videos were included, and the total number of views was 100,290,242 with a total duration of 29 h and 8 min. While 26.6% of videos were uploaded by TV shows and YouTube channels, only 7.7% were uploaded by lung specialists. 65.4% of the videos contained scientifically correct information, whereas 18.5% contained misleading information. Although videos from medical professionals had a higher quality than videos from YouTube channels and TV shows, the latter were more popular. Misleading videos had numerically, but not statistically significant higher views compared with useful videos. YouTube videos on asthma are popular in terms of viewer interaction, and the popularity is not restricted to videos uploaded by professional sources. Although more than half of the videos were found to be useful, a non-negligible proportion of videos were assessed as misleading. The usefulness of YouTube videos on asthma is variable and initiatives should be taken to increase the potential of YouTube as an useful source in patient education.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Patient education is a key element in the management of asthma.
AIMS
This study aimed to evaluate the popularity and usefulness of YouTube videos on asthma.
METHODS
Two authors screened and evaluated the 200 most popular videos. Data on likes, dislikes, views, comment, source of uploader, days since upload, and usefulness were recorded and included for analyses. The usefulness of the videos was categorized as follows:
RESULTS
A total of 130 videos were included, and the total number of views was 100,290,242 with a total duration of 29 h and 8 min. While 26.6% of videos were uploaded by TV shows and YouTube channels, only 7.7% were uploaded by lung specialists. 65.4% of the videos contained scientifically correct information, whereas 18.5% contained misleading information. Although videos from medical professionals had a higher quality than videos from YouTube channels and TV shows, the latter were more popular. Misleading videos had numerically, but not statistically significant higher views compared with useful videos.
CONCLUSIONS
YouTube videos on asthma are popular in terms of viewer interaction, and the popularity is not restricted to videos uploaded by professional sources. Although more than half of the videos were found to be useful, a non-negligible proportion of videos were assessed as misleading. The usefulness of YouTube videos on asthma is variable and initiatives should be taken to increase the potential of YouTube as an useful source in patient education.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35837808
doi: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2093218
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

737-743

Auteurs

Caroline Skovsgaard Diers (CS)

Faculty of Health and Medical Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Celine Remvig (C)

Faculty of Health and Medical Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Hanieh Meteran (H)

Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.

Simon Francis Thomsen (SF)

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Wound Healing Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Torben Sigsgaard (T)

Department of Public Health, Environment, Occupation and Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Simon Høj (S)

Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.

Howraman Meteran (H)

Department of Public Health, Environment, Occupation and Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH