Environmental impact of single-use, reusable, and mixed trocar systems used for laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
09
03
2022
accepted:
03
07
2022
entrez:
15
7
2022
pubmed:
16
7
2022
medline:
20
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Climate change is one of the 21st century's biggest public health issues and health care contributes up to 10% of the emissions of greenhouse gases in developed countries. About 15 million laparoscopic procedures are performed annually worldwide and single-use medical equipment is increasingly used during these procedures. Little is known about costs and environmental footprint of this change in practice. We employed Life Cycle Assessment method to evaluate and compare the environmental impacts of single-use, reusable, and mixed trocar systems used for laparoscopic cholecystectomies at three hospitals in southern Sweden. The environmental impacts were calculated using the IMPACT 2002+ method and a functional unit of 500 procedures. Monte Carlo simulations were used to estimate differences between trocar systems. Data are presented as medians and 2.5th to 97.5th percentiles. Financial costs were calculated using Life Cycle Costing. The single-use system had a 182% higher impact on resources than the reusable system [difference: 5160 MJ primary (4400-5770)]. The single-use system had a 379% higher impact on climate change than the reusable system [difference: 446 kg CO2eq (413-483)]. The single-use system had an 83% higher impact than the reusable system on ecosystem quality [difference: 79 PDF*m2*yr (24-112)] and a 240% higher impact on human health [difference: 2.4x10-4 DALY/person/yr (2.2x10-4-2.6x10-4)]. The mixed and single-use systems had a similar environmental impact. Differences between single-use and reusable trocars with regard to resource use and ecosystem quality were found to be sensitive to lower filling of machines in the sterilization process. For ecosystem quality the difference between the two were further sensitive to a 50% decrease in number of reuses, and to using a fossil fuel intensive electricity mix. Differences regarding effects on climate change and human health were robust in the sensitivity analyses. The reusable and mixed trocar systems were approximately half as expensive as the single-use systems (17360 € and 18560 € versus 37600 €, respectively). In the Swedish healthcare system the reusable trocar system offers a robust opportunity to reduce both the environmental impact and financial costs for laparoscopic surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35839237
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271601
pii: PONE-D-22-07043
pmc: PMC9286249
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0271601Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1067-72
pubmed: 22492190
Lakartidningen. 2019 Feb 26;116:
pubmed: 31192420
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 31;15(7):e1002623
pubmed: 30063712
BMJ. 2018 Feb 8;360:k120
pubmed: 29437677
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 17;10(3):e0121221
pubmed: 25781175
Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1073-80
pubmed: 22492185
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Jan;87(1-2):28-33
pubmed: 27878921
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 09;11(6):e0157014
pubmed: 27280706
Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1055-66
pubmed: 22492184
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4067-4078
pubmed: 34559257
Anesth Analg. 2018 Aug;127(2):434-443
pubmed: 29324492
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 May;38(3):538-44
pubmed: 20514965
Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1907-1918
pubmed: 28408086
Surg Endosc. 2005 Feb;19(2):268-72
pubmed: 15580444
PeerJ. 2019 Feb 22;7:e6204
pubmed: 30809428
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Jan;2(1):e27-e35
pubmed: 29615206