Cervical cancer screening programmes and age-specific coverage estimates for 202 countries and territories worldwide: a review and synthetic analysis.


Journal

The Lancet. Global health
ISSN: 2214-109X
Titre abrégé: Lancet Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101613665

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2022
Historique:
received: 21 07 2021
revised: 09 05 2022
accepted: 11 05 2022
pubmed: 16 7 2022
medline: 20 7 2022
entrez: 15 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cervical cancer screening coverage is a key monitoring indicator of the WHO cervical cancer elimination plan. We present global, regional, and national cervical screening coverage estimates against the backdrop of the 70% coverage target set by WHO. In this review and synthetic analysis, we searched scientific literature, government websites, and official documentation to identify official national recommendations and coverage data for cervical cancer screening for the 194 WHO member states and eight associated countries and territories published from database inception until Oct 30, 2020, supplemented with a formal WHO country consultation from Nov 27, 2020, to Feb 12, 2021. We extracted data on the year of introduction of recommendations, the existence of individual invitation to participate, financing of screening tests, primary screening and triage tests used, recommended ages and screening intervals, use of self-sampling, and use of screen-and-treat approaches. We also collected coverage data, either administrative or survey-based, as disaggregated as possible by age and for any available screening interval. According to data completeness and representativeness, different statistical models were developed to produce national age-specific coverages by screening interval, which were transformed into single-age datapoints. Missing data were imputed. Estimates were applied to the 2019 population and aggregated by region and income level. We identified recommendations for cervical screening in 139 (69%) of 202 countries and territories. Cytology was the primary screening test in 109 (78%) of 139 countries. 48 (35%) of 139 countries recommended primary HPV-based screening. Visual inspection with acetic acid was the most recommended test in resource-limited settings. Estimated worldwide coverage in women aged 30-49 years in 2019 was 15% in the previous year, 28% in the previous 3 years, and 32% in the previous 5 years, and 36% ever in lifetime. An estimated 1·6 billion (67%) of 2·3 billion women aged 20-70 years, including 662 million (64%) of 1·0 billion women aged 30-49 years, had never been screened for cervical cancer. 133 million (84%) of 158 million women aged 30-49 years living in high-income countries had been screened ever in lifetime, compared with 194 million (48%) of 404 million women in upper-middle-income countries, 34 million (9%) of 397 million women in lower-middle-income countries, and 8 million (11%) of 74 million in low-income countries. Two in three women aged 30-49 years have never been screened for cervical cancer. Roll-out of screening is very low in low-income and middle-income countries, where the burden of disease is highest. The priority of the WHO elimination campaign should be to increase both screening coverage and treatment of detected lesions; however, expanding the efforts of surveillance systems in both coverage and quality control are major challenges to achieving the WHO elimination target. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, European Regional Development Fund, Secretariat for Universities and Research of the Department of Business and Knowledge of the Government of Catalonia, and Horizon 2020. For the French, Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Cervical cancer screening coverage is a key monitoring indicator of the WHO cervical cancer elimination plan. We present global, regional, and national cervical screening coverage estimates against the backdrop of the 70% coverage target set by WHO.
METHODS
In this review and synthetic analysis, we searched scientific literature, government websites, and official documentation to identify official national recommendations and coverage data for cervical cancer screening for the 194 WHO member states and eight associated countries and territories published from database inception until Oct 30, 2020, supplemented with a formal WHO country consultation from Nov 27, 2020, to Feb 12, 2021. We extracted data on the year of introduction of recommendations, the existence of individual invitation to participate, financing of screening tests, primary screening and triage tests used, recommended ages and screening intervals, use of self-sampling, and use of screen-and-treat approaches. We also collected coverage data, either administrative or survey-based, as disaggregated as possible by age and for any available screening interval. According to data completeness and representativeness, different statistical models were developed to produce national age-specific coverages by screening interval, which were transformed into single-age datapoints. Missing data were imputed. Estimates were applied to the 2019 population and aggregated by region and income level.
FINDINGS
We identified recommendations for cervical screening in 139 (69%) of 202 countries and territories. Cytology was the primary screening test in 109 (78%) of 139 countries. 48 (35%) of 139 countries recommended primary HPV-based screening. Visual inspection with acetic acid was the most recommended test in resource-limited settings. Estimated worldwide coverage in women aged 30-49 years in 2019 was 15% in the previous year, 28% in the previous 3 years, and 32% in the previous 5 years, and 36% ever in lifetime. An estimated 1·6 billion (67%) of 2·3 billion women aged 20-70 years, including 662 million (64%) of 1·0 billion women aged 30-49 years, had never been screened for cervical cancer. 133 million (84%) of 158 million women aged 30-49 years living in high-income countries had been screened ever in lifetime, compared with 194 million (48%) of 404 million women in upper-middle-income countries, 34 million (9%) of 397 million women in lower-middle-income countries, and 8 million (11%) of 74 million in low-income countries.
INTERPRETATION
Two in three women aged 30-49 years have never been screened for cervical cancer. Roll-out of screening is very low in low-income and middle-income countries, where the burden of disease is highest. The priority of the WHO elimination campaign should be to increase both screening coverage and treatment of detected lesions; however, expanding the efforts of surveillance systems in both coverage and quality control are major challenges to achieving the WHO elimination target.
FUNDING
Instituto de Salud Carlos III, European Regional Development Fund, Secretariat for Universities and Research of the Department of Business and Knowledge of the Government of Catalonia, and Horizon 2020.
TRANSLATIONS
For the French, Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35839811
pii: S2214-109X(22)00241-8
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00241-8
pmc: PMC9296658
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1115-e1127

Subventions

Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 World Health Organization; licensee Elsevier. This is an Open Access article published under the CC BY NC ND 3.0 IGO license which permits users to download and share the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the article is reproduced in the whole without changes, and provided the original source is properly cited. This article shall not be used or reproduced in association with the promotion of commercial products, services or any entity. There should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organisation, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests The Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme (with which LB, BS, ER, and LA are affiliated) has received sponsorship for grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme and HPV test kits at no cost from Roche for research purposes. All other authors report no competing interests. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of WHO. Authors who are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO, are responsible alone for the views expressed in this article, and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy, or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO.

Références

N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 11;385(20):1908-1918
pubmed: 34758259
Prev Med. 2021 Mar;144:106294
pubmed: 33678225
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):575-590
pubmed: 32007141
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jul;138 Suppl 1:63-68
pubmed: 28691331
JAMA. 2020 Oct 20;324(15):1532-1542
pubmed: 33079153
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 May;26(5):579-583
pubmed: 31539637
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):e19-e23
pubmed: 27371184
PLoS Med. 2008 Jun 17;5(6):e132
pubmed: 18563963
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 31;31 Suppl 7:H59-70
pubmed: 24332298
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 30;31 Suppl 6:G32-44
pubmed: 24331818
Prev Med. 2021 Mar;144:106322
pubmed: 33678230
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Mar;22(3):361-369
pubmed: 33556324
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e425
pubmed: 32673570
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Aug;27(8):1083-1095
pubmed: 33975008
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;115(5):615-618
pubmed: 28168717
Prev Med. 2021 Oct;151:106687
pubmed: 34217408
Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Feb;20(1):1-13
pubmed: 18802779
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Sep;26(9):1144-1150
pubmed: 32247892
Lancet. 2020 Feb 22;395(10224):591-603
pubmed: 32007142
Prev Med. 2021 Oct;151:106596
pubmed: 34217415
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Apr;14(5):391-436
pubmed: 23628188
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-e203
pubmed: 31812369
Lancet. 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):524-32
pubmed: 24192252
Vaccine. 2012 Nov 20;30 Suppl 5:F88-99
pubmed: 23199969

Auteurs

Laia Bruni (L)

Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: lbruni@iconcologia.net.

Beatriz Serrano (B)

Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain.

Esther Roura (E)

Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain.

Laia Alemany (L)

Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain.

Melanie Cowan (M)

Surveillance, Monitoring, and Reporting Unit, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.

Rolando Herrero (R)

Agencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Fundación INCIENSA, San José, Costa Rica; Early Detection and Prevention Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO, Lyon, France.

Mario Poljak (M)

Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Raul Murillo (R)

Early Detection and Prevention Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO, Lyon, France; Centro Javeriano de Oncología, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia.

Nathalie Broutet (N)

Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.

Leanne M Riley (LM)

Surveillance, Monitoring, and Reporting Unit, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.

Silvia de Sanjose (S)

National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA; ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH