Sickle cell trait results in a high leukoreduction quality control failure rate for whole blood donations.


Journal

Transfusion
ISSN: 1537-2995
Titre abrégé: Transfusion
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0417360

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2022
Historique:
revised: 11 06 2022
received: 13 04 2022
accepted: 20 06 2022
pubmed: 17 7 2022
medline: 14 9 2022
entrez: 16 7 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Prior studies have shown that sickle cell trait (SCT) is the most common reason attributed to leukoreduction (LR) filter failure due to physical blockage. However, current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines do not require blood collectors to take a specific action to mitigate inadequate LR that may occur among donors with SCT. We sought to determine the scope of inadequate LR among whole blood (WB) donations collected from individuals with SCT and processed under standard manufacturing conditions. Between 8/2021 and 2/2022, a total of 40 red blood cells units (RBCs) manufactured from WB donations collected from donors historically positive for SCT had residual leukocyte testing performed. All 40 of the units had appeared to successfully complete leukofiltration. Out of the 40 units tested, 22 failed routine residual leukocyte quality control testing (55% failure rate, 95% confidence interval 40%-70%). Nine out of the 22 failures resulted in more than 100 residual leukocytes per microliter of product. Even when leukofiltration appears to have been completed successfully, WB units collected from donors with SCT have a high (55% in aggregate) rate of inadequate leukoreduction. Correlating this result with previous studies showing that of up to 50% of WB units collected from donors with SCT fail to pass through the leukoreduction filter, we estimate that only 25% of WB donations collected from individuals with SCT will result in a leukoreduced RBC unit that meets all FDA requirements. Blood centers should encourage individuals with SCT to donate platelets or plasma, rather than WB.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Prior studies have shown that sickle cell trait (SCT) is the most common reason attributed to leukoreduction (LR) filter failure due to physical blockage. However, current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines do not require blood collectors to take a specific action to mitigate inadequate LR that may occur among donors with SCT. We sought to determine the scope of inadequate LR among whole blood (WB) donations collected from individuals with SCT and processed under standard manufacturing conditions.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
Between 8/2021 and 2/2022, a total of 40 red blood cells units (RBCs) manufactured from WB donations collected from donors historically positive for SCT had residual leukocyte testing performed. All 40 of the units had appeared to successfully complete leukofiltration.
RESULTS
Out of the 40 units tested, 22 failed routine residual leukocyte quality control testing (55% failure rate, 95% confidence interval 40%-70%). Nine out of the 22 failures resulted in more than 100 residual leukocytes per microliter of product.
CONCLUSION
Even when leukofiltration appears to have been completed successfully, WB units collected from donors with SCT have a high (55% in aggregate) rate of inadequate leukoreduction. Correlating this result with previous studies showing that of up to 50% of WB units collected from donors with SCT fail to pass through the leukoreduction filter, we estimate that only 25% of WB donations collected from individuals with SCT will result in a leukoreduced RBC unit that meets all FDA requirements. Blood centers should encourage individuals with SCT to donate platelets or plasma, rather than WB.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35841199
doi: 10.1111/trf.17021
pmc: PMC9546366
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1727-1730

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Transfusion published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AABB.

Références

Transfus Med Rev. 2004 Jul;18(3):168-76
pubmed: 15248166
Transfusion. 2022 Sep;62(9):1727-1730
pubmed: 35841199
Transfusion. 2017 May;57(5):1226-1234
pubmed: 28205236
Transfusion. 2004 Jan;44(1):25-9
pubmed: 14692963
Blood. 2013 Aug 8;122(6):1062-71
pubmed: 23723452
Transfus Apher Sci. 2001 Apr;24(2):223-5
pubmed: 11501573
Transfusion. 2016 Jun;56(6 Pt 2):1581-7
pubmed: 26968400
Transfus Med Rev. 2019 Jan;33(1):12-23
pubmed: 30122266
Transfusion. 2020 May;60(5):940-946
pubmed: 32086954
Transfusion. 2017 Nov;57(11):2738-2746
pubmed: 28840600
Blood Adv. 2020 Jan 28;4(2):327-355
pubmed: 31985807
N Engl J Med. 1997 Dec 25;337(26):1861-9
pubmed: 9417523
Blood. 2018 Sep 13;132(11):1198-1207
pubmed: 30026182

Auteurs

Eric A Gehrie (EA)

American Red Cross, Biomedical Services Division, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Lori Petran (L)

American Red Cross, Biomedical Services Division, Peoria, Illinois, USA.

Pampee P Young (PP)

American Red Cross, Biomedical Services Division, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH