Honey bee (
Beekeeping
Brood area
Honey bee health
Management practices
Pollen substitute
Queen bee fecundity
Journal
Saudi journal of biological sciences
ISSN: 1319-562X
Titre abrégé: Saudi J Biol Sci
Pays: Saudi Arabia
ID NLM: 101543796
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
received:
07
12
2021
revised:
18
01
2022
accepted:
24
01
2022
entrez:
18
7
2022
pubmed:
19
7
2022
medline:
19
7
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Honey bee colony nutritional dynamics depend on the availability of floral resources throughout a countryside with varying forage circumstances. Few studies quantify the queen fecundity and colony performance about certain management approaches on a broad scale. The present study was conducted to investigate the queen bee fecundity and various colony performance parameters in response to different nutritional practices, i.e., Group-I, supplied with sucrose solution (1:1; w/v), Group-II, provided with locally available commercial pollen substitute, Group-III, supplied with both sucrose solution + locally available commercial pollen substitute, and Group-IV without any sugar solution and pollen substitute. Our results demonstrated that eggs laid by queen bees were significantly higher (1241.83 ± 46.24) in Group-III than in other groups over the time of observations. Similarly, a significant difference was noticed in the mean sealed worker brood area and honey store area between the different groups of management practices. Both, the max mean sealed worker brood area (2153.53 ± 29.18 cm
Identifiants
pubmed: 35844381
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.056
pii: S1319-562X(22)00056-0
pmc: PMC9280171
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3151-3156Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Genetika. 2010 May;46(5):685-91
pubmed: 20583605
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017 Jul;24(5):1086-1093
pubmed: 28663709
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jan 08;21(2):
pubmed: 31936187
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 4;14(12):e0225845
pubmed: 31800608
Genet Mol Res. 2013 Nov 07;12(4):5382-91
pubmed: 24301910
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Jun;28(6):3235-3241
pubmed: 34121860
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Jan;28(1):1167-1176
pubmed: 33424413
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 5;13(9):e0203444
pubmed: 30183759
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0258430
pubmed: 34634080
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 11;8(1):10475
pubmed: 29992997
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;28(3):1528-1538
pubmed: 33732036
J Econ Entomol. 2018 Aug 3;111(4):1509-1516
pubmed: 29746645
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019 Nov;26(7):1581-1586
pubmed: 31762630
Neotrop Entomol. 2019 Jun;48(3):373-380
pubmed: 30478776
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019 May;26(4):681-687
pubmed: 31048992
Insects. 2017 May 08;8(2):
pubmed: 28481294
PeerJ. 2021 Jul 27;9:e11634
pubmed: 34395063
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2011 Jan;18(1):73-7
pubmed: 23961106