Cellular and Humoral Immune Response to a Third Dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccine - A Prospective Observational Study.


Journal

Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 14 03 2022
accepted: 07 06 2022
entrez: 18 7 2022
pubmed: 19 7 2022
medline: 20 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Since the introduction of various vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 at the end of 2020, infection rates have continued to climb worldwide. This led to the establishment of a third dose vaccination in several countries, known as a booster. To date, there has been little real-world data about the immunological effect of this strategy. We compared the humoral- and cellular immune response before and after the third dose of BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine BNT162b2, following different prime-boost regimen in a prospective observational study. Humoral immunity was assessed by determining anti-SARS-CoV-2 binding antibodies using a standardized quantitative assay. In addition, neutralizing antibodies were measured using a commercial surrogate ELISA-assay. Interferon-gamma release was measured after stimulating blood-cells with SARS-CoV-2 specific peptides using a commercial assay to evaluate the cellular immune response. We included 243 health-care workers who provided blood samples and questionnaires pre- and post- third vaccination. The median antibody level increased significantly after the third vaccination dose to 2663.1 BAU/ml vs. 101.4 BAU/ml (p < 0.001) before administration of the booster dose. This was also detected for neutralizing antibodies with a binding inhibition of 99.68% ± 0.36% vs. 69.06% ± 19.88% after the second dose (p < 0.001). 96.3% of the participants showed a detectable T-cell-response after the booster dose with a mean interferon-gamma level of 2207.07 mIU/ml ± 1905 mIU/ml. This study detected a BMI-dependent antibody increase after the third dose of BNT162b2 following different vaccination protocols. All participants showed a significant increase in their immune response. This, in combination with the low rate of post-vaccination-symptoms underlines the potential beneficial effect of a BNT162b2-booster dose.

Sections du résumé

Background
Since the introduction of various vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 at the end of 2020, infection rates have continued to climb worldwide. This led to the establishment of a third dose vaccination in several countries, known as a booster. To date, there has been little real-world data about the immunological effect of this strategy.
Methods
We compared the humoral- and cellular immune response before and after the third dose of BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine BNT162b2, following different prime-boost regimen in a prospective observational study. Humoral immunity was assessed by determining anti-SARS-CoV-2 binding antibodies using a standardized quantitative assay. In addition, neutralizing antibodies were measured using a commercial surrogate ELISA-assay. Interferon-gamma release was measured after stimulating blood-cells with SARS-CoV-2 specific peptides using a commercial assay to evaluate the cellular immune response.
Results
We included 243 health-care workers who provided blood samples and questionnaires pre- and post- third vaccination. The median antibody level increased significantly after the third vaccination dose to 2663.1 BAU/ml vs. 101.4 BAU/ml (p < 0.001) before administration of the booster dose. This was also detected for neutralizing antibodies with a binding inhibition of 99.68% ± 0.36% vs. 69.06% ± 19.88% after the second dose (p < 0.001). 96.3% of the participants showed a detectable T-cell-response after the booster dose with a mean interferon-gamma level of 2207.07 mIU/ml ± 1905 mIU/ml.
Conclusion
This study detected a BMI-dependent antibody increase after the third dose of BNT162b2 following different vaccination protocols. All participants showed a significant increase in their immune response. This, in combination with the low rate of post-vaccination-symptoms underlines the potential beneficial effect of a BNT162b2-booster dose.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35844588
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.896151
pmc: PMC9286388
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Neutralizing 0
Antibodies, Viral 0
COVID-19 Vaccines 0
Viral Vaccines 0
Interferon-gamma 82115-62-6
BNT162 Vaccine N38TVC63NU

Banques de données

DRKS
['DRKS00021270']

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

896151

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Herzberg, Fischer, Becher, Becker, Honarpisheh, Guraya, Strate and Knabbe.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2258-2276
pubmed: 34863358
JAMA. 2021 Jul 23;:
pubmed: 34297036
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 9;385(24):e84
pubmed: 34614326
Lancet. 2021 Sep 4;398(10303):856-869
pubmed: 34370971
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 24;16(3):e0245424
pubmed: 33760825
J Infect. 2022 Jun;84(6):795-813
pubmed: 35405168
Lancet. 2021 May 29;397(10289):2043-2046
pubmed: 33991480
J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 5;225(1):30-33
pubmed: 34726239
Lancet Microbe. 2022 Jan;3(1):e52-e61
pubmed: 34806056
Kidney Int. 2021 Sep;100(3):702-704
pubmed: 34216675
Front Immunol. 2022 Mar 04;13:839922
pubmed: 35309303
JAMA. 1985 Dec 13;254(22):3187-9
pubmed: 2933532
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 30;21(1):715
pubmed: 34330228
JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2203-2204
pubmed: 34739043
Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Aug;36(8):1072-7
pubmed: 22024641
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 Sep-Oct;15(5):102254
pubmed: 34450550
Lancet. 2021 Dec 4;398(10316):2093-2100
pubmed: 34756184
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1212-1213
pubmed: 34332707
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):661-662
pubmed: 34161700
Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 16;13:828053
pubmed: 35251012
J Med Virol. 2022 Aug;94(8):3768-3775
pubmed: 35434796
N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 21;386(16):1532-1546
pubmed: 35249272
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 17;386(11):1046-1057
pubmed: 35081293
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;102:136-143
pubmed: 33075538
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Feb 1;182(2):179-184
pubmed: 34846533
J Hepatol. 2022 Apr 19;:
pubmed: 35452692
J Clin Virol. 2021 Nov;144:104984
pubmed: 34563863
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Feb 1;182(2):165-171
pubmed: 34928302
Cell. 2021 Aug 5;184(16):4220-4236.e13
pubmed: 34242578
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 7;385(15):1393-1400
pubmed: 34525275
Vaccine. 2022 Jan 21;40(2):206-212
pubmed: 34895938

Auteurs

Jonas Herzberg (J)

Department of Surgery - Krankenhaus Reinbek St. Adolf-Stift, Reinbek, Germany.

Bastian Fischer (B)

Institut für Laboratoriums- und Transfusionsmedizin, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.

Heiko Becher (H)

Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Ann-Kristin Becker (AK)

Asklepios Klinik Harburg, Abteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Hamburg, Germany.

Human Honarpisheh (H)

Department of Surgery - Krankenhaus Reinbek St. Adolf-Stift, Reinbek, Germany.

Salman Yousuf Guraya (SY)

Clinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

Tim Strate (T)

Department of Surgery - Krankenhaus Reinbek St. Adolf-Stift, Reinbek, Germany.

Cornelius Knabbe (C)

Institut für Laboratoriums- und Transfusionsmedizin, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH