Computational Analysis of Flow Structures in Turbulent Ventricular Blood Flow Associated With Mitral Valve Intervention.
FEM
finite element method
left ventricle
mitral valve clip
patient-specific heart modelling
triple decomposition of velocity gradient tensor
turbulent blood flow
Journal
Frontiers in physiology
ISSN: 1664-042X
Titre abrégé: Front Physiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101549006
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
31
10
2021
accepted:
01
04
2022
entrez:
18
7
2022
pubmed:
19
7
2022
medline:
19
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cardiac disease and clinical intervention may both lead to an increased risk for thrombosis events due to a modified blood flow in the heart, and thereby a change in the mechanical stimuli of blood cells passing through the chambers of the heart. Specifically, the degree of platelet activation is influenced by the level and type of mechanical stresses in the blood flow. In this article we analyze the blood flow in the left ventricle of the heart through a computational model constructed from patient-specific data. The blood flow in the ventricle is modelled by the Navier-Stokes equations, and the flow through the mitral valve by a parameterized model which represents the projected opening of the valve. A finite element method is used to solve the equations, from which a simulation of the velocity and pressure of the blood flow is constructed. The intraventricular blood flow is complex, in particular in diastole when the inflow jet from the atrium breaks down into turbulent flow on a range of scales. A triple decomposition of the velocity gradient tensor is then used to distinguish between rigid body rotational flow, irrotational straining flow, and shear flow. The triple decomposition enables the separation of three fundamentally different flow structures, that each generates a distinct type of mechanical stimulus on the blood cells in the flow. We compare the results in a simulation where a mitral valve clip intervention is modelled, which leads to a significant modification of the intraventricular flow. Further, we perform a sensitivity study of the results with respect to the positioning of the clip. It was found that the shear in the simulation cases treated with clips increased more compared to the untreated case than the rotation and strain did. A decrease in valve opening area of 64% in one of the cases led to a 90% increase in rotation and strain, but a 150% increase in shear. The computational analysis opens up for improvements in models of shear-induced platelet activation, by offering an algorithm to distinguish shear from other modalities in intraventricular blood flow.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35846019
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.806534
pii: 806534
pmc: PMC9280136
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
806534Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Kronborg, Svelander, Eriksson-Lidbrink, Lindström, Homs-Pons, Lucor and Hoffman.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Med Eng Phys. 2001 Nov;23(9):647-55
pubmed: 11755809
JACC Case Rep. 2020 Jun 17;2(7):1084-1088
pubmed: 34317420
Artif Organs. 1995 Jul;19(7):590-6
pubmed: 8572957
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227
pubmed: 33332150
J Biomech. 2016 Jun 14;49(9):1482-1489
pubmed: 27040387
Blood Transfus. 2011 Apr;9(2):120-38
pubmed: 21084000
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 Nov;36(11):2261-2275
pubmed: 28742031
Artif Organs. 2015 Jul;39(7):576-83
pubmed: 25808300
J Biomech Eng. 2022 Apr 1;144(4):
pubmed: 34529037
J Heart Valve Dis. 2001 Mar;10(2):146-52
pubmed: 11297199
Artif Organs. 2001 May;25(5):341-7
pubmed: 11403662
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2009 Apr 20;7:18
pubmed: 19379479
Front Physiol. 2020 May 07;11:432
pubmed: 32457650
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2019 Dec;35(12):e3274
pubmed: 31680447
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020 Sep;193:111118
pubmed: 32450503
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jul 23;62(4):317-28
pubmed: 23665364
J Biomech Eng. 2016 Dec 1;138(12):
pubmed: 27657486
Front Physiol. 2018 Apr 30;9:458
pubmed: 29760665
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2019 Aug;18(4):1139-1153
pubmed: 30900051