Comparative effectiveness of ciltacabtagene autoleucel in CARTITUDE-1 versus physician's choice of therapy in the Flatiron Health multiple myeloma cohort registry for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
CARTITUDE‐1
Flatiron Health
ciltacabtagene autoleucel
indirect treatment comparison
relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
triple‐class exposed
Journal
EJHaem
ISSN: 2688-6146
Titre abrégé: EJHaem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101761942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
28
07
2021
revised:
20
09
2021
accepted:
21
09
2021
entrez:
18
7
2022
pubmed:
19
7
2022
medline:
19
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a novel chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy that is being evaluated in the CARTITUDE-1 trial (NCT03548207) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who received as part of their previous therapy an immunomodulatory drug, proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (i.e., triple-class exposed). Given the absence of a control arm in CARTITUDE-1, this study assessed the comparative effectiveness of cilta-cel and physician's choice of treatment (PCT) using an external real-world control arm from the Flatiron Health multiple myeloma cohort registry. Given the availability of individual patient data for cilta-cel from CARTITUDE-1 and PCT in Flatiron, inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for unbalanced baseline covariates of prognostic significance: refractory status, cytogenetic profile, International Staging System stage, time to progression on last regimen, number of prior lines of therapy, years since diagnosis, and age. Comparative effectiveness was estimated for progression-free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS). A range of sensitivity analyses were conducted. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two cohorts after propensity score weighting. Patients with cilta-cel had improved PFS (HR: 0.18 [95% CI: 0.12, 0.27; Cilta-cel demonstrated significantly superior effectiveness over PCT for all outcomes, highlighting its potential as an effective therapy in patients with triple-class exposed RRMM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35846215
doi: 10.1002/jha2.312
pii: JHA2312
pmc: PMC9175662
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
97-108Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
KW received honoraria from and served in a consulting or advisory role for Adaptive Biotechonlogies, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, KaryopharmTherapeutics, Oncopeptides, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, and Takeda, served in a consulting or advisory role for GSK, received travel funding from Amgen, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, and Takeda, and received research funding from Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Sanofi.TM served in a consulting or advisory role for GlaxoSmithKline and Juno Therapeutics, and received research funding from Amgen, Janssen, and Sanofi.AK served in a consulting or advisory role for Adaptive Biotechnologies, Celgene/Bristol Meyers‐Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Oncology, Pfizer, Regeneron, served on speakers bureaus for Amgen, Celgene/Bristol Meyers‐Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline and Takeda, served on scientific advisory boards for Sutro Biopharma, has equity in Celgene/Bristol Meyers‐Squibb, and received research funding from Janssen Oncology.SJ is a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Merck, Sanofi, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals.SZU served in a consulting or advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Merck, Seattle Genetics, Skyline Diagnostics, and Takeda, served on speakers bureaus for Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda, and received research funding from Amgen, Array BioPharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, and Skyline Diagnostics.JGB served in a consulting or advisory role for Bluebird Bio, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, CRISPR Therapeutics, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite/Gilead, Legend Biotech, Secura Bio, Servier, and Takeda, and received research funding from AbbVie, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Bluebird Bio, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celularity, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, CURIS, EMD Serono, Genentech/Roche, Glenmark, Ichnos Sciences, Janssen, Kesios Therapeutics, Lilly, Novartis, Poseida, Sanofi, Takeda, Teva, and Vivolux.KY is consultant physician and received honoraria from Janssen, GSK, Amgen Inc., Takeda, Sanofi and research funding from Janssen, Takeda, Sanofi.AL, CC, JMS, KQ, MV, AB, JD, SN, SV, and YO are employed by Janssen and have restricted stock units and/or stock options. CCJ is employed by Janssen and is a consultant physician at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. MM was employed by Janssen when the study was conducted.
Références
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107
pubmed: 19757444
J Hematol Oncol. 2018 Jan 16;11(1):10
pubmed: 29338789
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2020 Apr;15(2):62-71
pubmed: 32198576
EJHaem. 2021 Dec 10;3(1):97-108
pubmed: 35846215
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan;12(1):42-54
pubmed: 25421279
Am J Hematol. 2020 May;95(5):548-567
pubmed: 32212178
Leukemia. 2017 Nov;31(11):2443-2448
pubmed: 28620163
Lancet. 2021 Jul 24;398(10297):314-324
pubmed: 34175021
Oncologist. 2016 Nov;21(11):1355-1361
pubmed: 27486203
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4460-4476
pubmed: 29756355
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr 15;183(8):758-64
pubmed: 26994063
Med Decis Making. 2018 Feb;38(2):200-211
pubmed: 28823204
Leukemia. 2019 Sep;33(9):2266-2275
pubmed: 30858549
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr 1;173(7):761-7
pubmed: 21385832
Future Oncol. 2021 Feb;17(5):503-515
pubmed: 33522834
Pharm Stat. 2021 Jul;20(4):783-792
pubmed: 33655598