Children in foster care with symptoms of reactive attachment disorder: feasibility randomised controlled trial of a modified video-feedback parenting intervention.

Attachment disorder feasibility foster care parenting intervention randomised controlled trial

Journal

BJPsych open
ISSN: 2056-4724
Titre abrégé: BJPsych Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101667931

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Jul 2022
Historique:
entrez: 18 7 2022
pubmed: 19 7 2022
medline: 19 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Looked-after children are at risk of suboptimal attachment patterns and reactive attachment disorder (RAD). However, access to interventions varies widely, and there are no evidence-based interventions for RAD. To modify an existing parenting intervention for children with RAD in the UK foster care setting, and test the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the modified intervention. The intervention was modified with expert input and tested on a case series. A feasibility and pilot RCT compared the new intervention with usual care. Foster carers and children in their care aged ≤6 years were recruited across nine local authorities, with 1:1 allocation and blind post-treatment assessments. The modified intervention was delivered in-home by trained mental health professionals over 4-6 months. Children were assessed for RAD symptoms, attachment quality and emotional/behavioural difficulties, and foster carers were assessed for sensitivity and stress. Minimal changes to the intervention programme were necessary, and focused on improving its suitability for the UK foster care context. Recruitment was challenging, and remained below target despite modifications to the protocol and the inclusion of additional sites. Thirty families were recruited to the RCT; 15 were allocated to each group. Most other feasibility outcomes were favourable, particularly high numbers of data and treatment completeness. The revised intervention was positively received by practitioners and foster carers. A large-scale trial may be feasible, but only if recruitment barriers can be overcome. Dedicated resources to support recruitment within local authorities and wider inclusion criteria are recommended.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Looked-after children are at risk of suboptimal attachment patterns and reactive attachment disorder (RAD). However, access to interventions varies widely, and there are no evidence-based interventions for RAD.
AIMS OBJECTIVE
To modify an existing parenting intervention for children with RAD in the UK foster care setting, and test the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the modified intervention.
METHOD METHODS
The intervention was modified with expert input and tested on a case series. A feasibility and pilot RCT compared the new intervention with usual care. Foster carers and children in their care aged ≤6 years were recruited across nine local authorities, with 1:1 allocation and blind post-treatment assessments. The modified intervention was delivered in-home by trained mental health professionals over 4-6 months. Children were assessed for RAD symptoms, attachment quality and emotional/behavioural difficulties, and foster carers were assessed for sensitivity and stress.
RESULTS RESULTS
Minimal changes to the intervention programme were necessary, and focused on improving its suitability for the UK foster care context. Recruitment was challenging, and remained below target despite modifications to the protocol and the inclusion of additional sites. Thirty families were recruited to the RCT; 15 were allocated to each group. Most other feasibility outcomes were favourable, particularly high numbers of data and treatment completeness. The revised intervention was positively received by practitioners and foster carers.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
A large-scale trial may be feasible, but only if recruitment barriers can be overcome. Dedicated resources to support recruitment within local authorities and wider inclusion criteria are recommended.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35848060
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.538
pii: S2056472422005385
pmc: PMC9347233
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e134

Subventions

Organisme : Health Technology Assessment Programme
ID : 15/118/01

Références

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;41(5):645-55
pubmed: 10946756
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Aug;41(8):972-82
pubmed: 12162633
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(52):vii-xxviii, 1-347
pubmed: 26177494
Child Dev. 2022 Mar 31;:
pubmed: 35357693
Child Adolesc Social Work J. 2009 Aug;26(4):321-332
pubmed: 22065891
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Dec 21;15:316
pubmed: 26691535
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Mar 15;6:11
pubmed: 16539715
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2011 Dec;76(4):62-91
pubmed: 25242826
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 May;50(5):529-43
pubmed: 19298474
Child Dev. 1997 Aug;68(4):571-91
pubmed: 9306636
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 10;19(1):215
pubmed: 31291923
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;56(3):207-22
pubmed: 25359236
BMC Psychol. 2018 Aug 3;6(1):38
pubmed: 30075813
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Jun;15:189-194
pubmed: 28813260
Child Dev. 2010 Mar-Apr;81(2):435-56
pubmed: 20438450
Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;190:319-25
pubmed: 17401038

Auteurs

Paula Oliveira (P)

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK; and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, UK.

Lydia Barge (L)

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK; and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, UK.

Eloise Stevens (E)

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK; and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, UK.

Sarah Byford (S)

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.

James Shearer (J)

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.

Ruan Spies (R)

School of Psychosocial Health, North-West University, South Africa.

Julie Comyn (J)

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK.

Kirsty Langley (K)

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK.

Paul Ramchandani (P)

Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, UK.

Barry Wright (B)

Hull York Medical School, University of York, UK.

Matt Woolgar (M)

South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, UK; and Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.

Eilis Kennedy (E)

Research and Development Unit, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Stephen Scott (S)

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK.

Jane Barlow (J)

Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, UK.

Danya Glaser (D)

Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, UK; and Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK.

Rob Senior (R)

Research and Development Unit, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Peter Fonagy (P)

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK; and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, UK.

Pasco Fearon (P)

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK; Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, UK; and Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, UK.

Classifications MeSH