Virtual Care Prior to and During COVID-19: Cross-sectional Survey of Rural and Urban Adults.
COVID-19
digital literacy
rural
unmet needs
urban
virtual care
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Aug 2022
22 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
15
02
2022
accepted:
14
07
2022
revised:
28
06
2022
pubmed:
19
7
2022
medline:
19
7
2022
entrez:
18
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To reduce person-to-person contact, the COVID-19 pandemic has driven a massive shift to virtual care. Defined as the use of technology (synchronous or asynchronous) to support communication between health care providers and patients, rural-urban differences in virtual care are relatively unexplored. The 2-fold purpose of this study was to examine rural and urban virtual care access, use, and satisfaction during the pandemic and to identify any unmet needs. This study was a cross-sectional online survey exploring virtual care among rural and urban adults in summer 2021 using a combination of fixed and open-ended response options. Quantitative data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using inductive thematic content analysis. Overall, 501 (373, 74.4% female; age range 19-86 years; 237, 47.3% rural-living) Western Canadians completed the survey. Virtual care use was high among both rural (171/237, 72.2%) and urban (188/264, 71.2%) participants, with over one-half (279/501, 55.7%) reporting having only started to use virtual care since the pandemic. The self-reported need for mental health programs and services increased during the pandemic, compared with prior for both rural and urban participants. Among virtual care users, interest in its continuation was high. Our analysis also shows that internet quality (all P<.05) and eHealth literacy (all P<.001) were positively associated with participants' perceptions of virtual care usefulness, ease of use, and satisfaction, with no rural-urban differences. Rural participants were less likely to have used video in communicating with doctors or health care providers, compared with urban participants (P<.001). When describing unmet needs, participants described a (1) lack of access to care, (2) limited health promotion and prevention options, and (3) lack of mental health service options. The increased demand for and use of virtual care may reflect increased availability and a lack of alternatives due to limited in-person services during the COVID-19 pandemic, so a balance between virtual care and in-person care is important to consider postpandemic. Further, ensuring availability of high-speed internet and education to support patients will be important for providing accessible and effective virtual care, especially for rural residents.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To reduce person-to-person contact, the COVID-19 pandemic has driven a massive shift to virtual care. Defined as the use of technology (synchronous or asynchronous) to support communication between health care providers and patients, rural-urban differences in virtual care are relatively unexplored.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The 2-fold purpose of this study was to examine rural and urban virtual care access, use, and satisfaction during the pandemic and to identify any unmet needs.
METHODS
METHODS
This study was a cross-sectional online survey exploring virtual care among rural and urban adults in summer 2021 using a combination of fixed and open-ended response options. Quantitative data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics, and qualitative data were analyzed using inductive thematic content analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 501 (373, 74.4% female; age range 19-86 years; 237, 47.3% rural-living) Western Canadians completed the survey. Virtual care use was high among both rural (171/237, 72.2%) and urban (188/264, 71.2%) participants, with over one-half (279/501, 55.7%) reporting having only started to use virtual care since the pandemic. The self-reported need for mental health programs and services increased during the pandemic, compared with prior for both rural and urban participants. Among virtual care users, interest in its continuation was high. Our analysis also shows that internet quality (all P<.05) and eHealth literacy (all P<.001) were positively associated with participants' perceptions of virtual care usefulness, ease of use, and satisfaction, with no rural-urban differences. Rural participants were less likely to have used video in communicating with doctors or health care providers, compared with urban participants (P<.001). When describing unmet needs, participants described a (1) lack of access to care, (2) limited health promotion and prevention options, and (3) lack of mental health service options.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The increased demand for and use of virtual care may reflect increased availability and a lack of alternatives due to limited in-person services during the COVID-19 pandemic, so a balance between virtual care and in-person care is important to consider postpandemic. Further, ensuring availability of high-speed internet and education to support patients will be important for providing accessible and effective virtual care, especially for rural residents.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35849794
pii: v6i8e37059
doi: 10.2196/37059
pmc: PMC9400845
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e37059Informations de copyright
©Kathy L Rush, Cherisse L Seaton, Kendra Corman, Nicole Hawe, Eric Ping Hung Li, Sarah J Dow-Fleisner, Mohammad Khalad Hasan, Nelly D Oelke, Leanne M Currie, Barbara Pesut. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 22.08.2022.
Références
Mo Med. 2017 Sep-Oct;114(5):363-366
pubmed: 30228634
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Mar;30(3):236-239
pubmed: 32763977
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 2;100(13):e25207
pubmed: 33787602
Int J Telerehabil. 2020 Dec 8;12(2):53-64
pubmed: 33520095
CMAJ. 2021 Feb 8;193(6):E200-E210
pubmed: 33558406
Can J Rural Med. 2020 Jan-Mar;25(1):14-19
pubmed: 31854338
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 3;22(9):e21012
pubmed: 32880579
Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Mar 17;9(1):29
pubmed: 32183901
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Jun 2;:appips202100363
pubmed: 35652189
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2119530
pubmed: 34351404
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Jul;27(7):714-723
pubmed: 33197368
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 27;12(4):e0175372
pubmed: 28448497
Health Informatics J. 2021 Apr-Jun;27(2):14604582211020064
pubmed: 34041936
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jan 8;9(1):e25435
pubmed: 33395397
Health Rep. 2019 May 15;30(5):3-15
pubmed: 31091331
CMAJ Open. 2021 Feb 17;9(1):E107-E114
pubmed: 33597307
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 5;23(4):e26960
pubmed: 33769942
Am J Health Behav. 2009 Sep-Oct;33(5):550-7
pubmed: 19296745
Psychol Med. 2021 Apr;51(6):881-893
pubmed: 33648613
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;27(11):1816-1818
pubmed: 32589735
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2120940
pubmed: 34410398
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 11;69(36):1250-1257
pubmed: 32915166
Acta Biomed. 2020 Mar 19;91(1):157-160
pubmed: 32191675
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 10;18(18):
pubmed: 34574480
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 26;11(8):e045845
pubmed: 34446482
Int J Telerehabil. 2016 Jul 01;8(1):3-10
pubmed: 27563386
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 16;11(3):e045343
pubmed: 33727273
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Feb 24;114(8):121-127
pubmed: 28302261
J Patient Exp. 2021 Oct 29;8:23743735211052737
pubmed: 34734114
J Med Internet Res. 2006 Nov 14;8(4):e27
pubmed: 17213046