Contrasting reproductive strategies of two Hawaiian Montipora corals.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 07 2022
18 07 2022
Historique:
received:
17
02
2022
accepted:
04
07
2022
entrez:
19
7
2022
pubmed:
20
7
2022
medline:
22
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sessile invertebrates often engage in synchronized spawning events to increase likelihood of fertilization. Although coral reefs are well studied, the reproductive behavior of most species and the relative influence of various environmental cues that drive reproduction are not well understood. We conducted a comparative examination of the reproduction of the well-studied Hawaiian coral Montipora capitata and the relatively unknown reproduction of its congener, Montipora flabellata. Both are simultaneous hermaphroditic broadcast spawners that release egg-sperm bundles with external fertilization. Montipora capitata had a distinct reproductive pattern that resulted in coordinated gamete maturation and the synchronized release of thousands of egg-sperm bundles across two spawning pulses tightly coupled to consecutive new moon phases in June and July. Montipora flabellata exhibited a four month reproductive season with spawning that was four-fold less synchronous than M. capitata; its spawning was aperiodic with little linkage to moon phase, a broadly distributed release of only dozens or hundreds of bundles over multiple nights, and a spawning period that ranged from late June through September. The reproductive strategy of M. flabellata might prove detrimental under climate change if increased frequency and severity of bleaching events leave it sparsely populated and local stressors continue to degrade its habitat.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35851072
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16032-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-16032-6
pmc: PMC9293913
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12255Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Mar Pollut Bull. 2005 Feb;50(2):125-46
pubmed: 15737355
J Theor Biol. 1982 May 21;96(2):281-94
pubmed: 7121030
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 3;8:e9415
pubmed: 32685286
Rev Biol Trop. 2004 Dec;52(4):859-68
pubmed: 17354395
PeerJ. 2015 Aug 04;3:e1136
pubmed: 26290792
Nature. 2017 Mar 15;543(7645):373-377
pubmed: 28300113
Heredity (Edinb). 2008 Mar;100(3):296-303
pubmed: 17987054
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2006 Jul;144(3):247-53
pubmed: 16488637
Biol Bull. 1996 Feb;190(1):45-55
pubmed: 29244543
Curr Biol. 2021 Jan 25;31(2):413-419.e3
pubmed: 33157030
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 25;7(1):13985
pubmed: 29070842
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 9;11(1):12525
pubmed: 34108494
PeerJ. 2015 May 12;3:e950
pubmed: 26020007
Science. 2018 Jan 5;359(6371):80-83
pubmed: 29302011
PeerJ. 2015 Feb 17;3:e777
pubmed: 25737817
Nature. 2019 Apr;568(7752):387-390
pubmed: 30944475
Ecol Lett. 2012 Dec;15(12):1378-86
pubmed: 22938190
Mol Ecol. 2008 Jun;17(12):2796-811
pubmed: 18482262
Zygote. 2016 Aug;24(4):511-6
pubmed: 26349407
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 18;10(1):9914
pubmed: 32555307
Biol Bull. 2012 Jun;222(3):192-202
pubmed: 22815368
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 13;283(1822):
pubmed: 26763699
Science. 2007 Dec 14;318(5857):1737-42
pubmed: 18079392
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Oct;14(10):405-410
pubmed: 10481205
PeerJ. 2019 Jun 4;7:e7041
pubmed: 31198644
Sci Rep. 2018 May 9;8(1):7338
pubmed: 29743539
Biol Bull. 2014 Feb;226(1):8-18
pubmed: 24648203
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jan;15(1):10-13
pubmed: 10603497
Biol Bull. 1985 Oct;169(2):417-430
pubmed: 29314924
Biol Bull. 1997 Aug;193(1):20-29
pubmed: 28581845
Science. 2003 Aug 15;301(5635):929-33
pubmed: 12920289
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Mar 7;277(1682):715-22
pubmed: 19892757
Biol Bull. 1992 Dec;183(3):409-417
pubmed: 29300507
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Jun;10(6):228-31
pubmed: 21237018
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 24;6(1):e16557
pubmed: 21283632
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Apr;22(4):185-91
pubmed: 17175060
Ecol Lett. 2006 Apr;9(4):390-8
pubmed: 16623724