Developing good practice indicators to assist mental health practitioners to converse with young people about their online activities and impact on mental health: a two-panel mixed-methods Delphi study.


Journal

BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 07 2022
Historique:
received: 21 03 2022
accepted: 22 06 2022
entrez: 19 7 2022
pubmed: 20 7 2022
medline: 22 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Online activity has been linked to poor mental health in children and young people, particularly those with existing vulnerability who may inadvertently or otherwise access harmful content. It is suggested health and social care practitioners should address online activity during mental health consultations, but guidance about acceptable or effective ways to do this is lacking. This study sought to derive good practice guidance to support mental health practitioners to engage young people in conversations about their online activities and impact on mental health. A mixed-methods Delphi (consensus) study was conducted with a panel of mental health practitioners (n = 21) and a panel of young people (n = 22). Practitioners worked with children or young adults in the UK, mostly in statutory services (80.9%), in varied clinical roles, with 2 - 30 years of experience and most were female (87.5%). Young people were mostly female (77.3%), 13-22 years old, reported varied mental health diagnoses and had sought help from services. Across 3 rounds, panellists completed questionnaires which involved rating agreement with statements and answering open-ended questions. Iterative analysis informed subsequent questionnaire content. The percentage of participants rating their level of agreement with each statement was calculated. The threshold for inclusion as a good practice indicator (GPI) was 75% across both panels. Thematic analysis was used for free-text data. Twenty-seven GPIs emerged covering 'who' (which young people) should be asked about online activities, 'when', 'what' should be discussed, and with what 'outcome'. Panels agreed conversations should be initiated with all young people from first meeting and regularly thereafter, with 'red flags' indicating a conversation may be pertinent. Core topics were identified with additional areas for patients presenting with disordered eating or self-harm. Panels emphasised conversations should be fluid, normalised, and encourage reflection and self-awareness. Mental health practitioners could empower young people to exercise agency in relation to online safety and capitalise on positive features. Findings also identify training needs for practitioners. Further research should explore real-world application of the GPIs and transferability to underrepresented groups within our panels, such as males and younger children. Ethnicity and deprivation were not recorded.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Online activity has been linked to poor mental health in children and young people, particularly those with existing vulnerability who may inadvertently or otherwise access harmful content. It is suggested health and social care practitioners should address online activity during mental health consultations, but guidance about acceptable or effective ways to do this is lacking. This study sought to derive good practice guidance to support mental health practitioners to engage young people in conversations about their online activities and impact on mental health.
METHODS
A mixed-methods Delphi (consensus) study was conducted with a panel of mental health practitioners (n = 21) and a panel of young people (n = 22). Practitioners worked with children or young adults in the UK, mostly in statutory services (80.9%), in varied clinical roles, with 2 - 30 years of experience and most were female (87.5%). Young people were mostly female (77.3%), 13-22 years old, reported varied mental health diagnoses and had sought help from services. Across 3 rounds, panellists completed questionnaires which involved rating agreement with statements and answering open-ended questions. Iterative analysis informed subsequent questionnaire content. The percentage of participants rating their level of agreement with each statement was calculated. The threshold for inclusion as a good practice indicator (GPI) was 75% across both panels. Thematic analysis was used for free-text data.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven GPIs emerged covering 'who' (which young people) should be asked about online activities, 'when', 'what' should be discussed, and with what 'outcome'. Panels agreed conversations should be initiated with all young people from first meeting and regularly thereafter, with 'red flags' indicating a conversation may be pertinent. Core topics were identified with additional areas for patients presenting with disordered eating or self-harm. Panels emphasised conversations should be fluid, normalised, and encourage reflection and self-awareness.
CONCLUSIONS
Mental health practitioners could empower young people to exercise agency in relation to online safety and capitalise on positive features. Findings also identify training needs for practitioners. Further research should explore real-world application of the GPIs and transferability to underrepresented groups within our panels, such as males and younger children. Ethnicity and deprivation were not recorded.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35854237
doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04093-w
pii: 10.1186/s12888-022-04093-w
pmc: PMC9297563
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

485

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T046716/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Acad Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;44(1):78-81
pubmed: 31667791
Children (Basel). 2021 Oct 16;8(10):
pubmed: 34682190
Body Image. 2016 Jun;17:100-10
pubmed: 26995158
PLoS One. 2018 May 24;13(5):e0197712
pubmed: 29795637
J Behav Addict. 2021 Sep 16;10(3):566-586
pubmed: 34550906
Crisis. 2018 Nov;39(6):469-478
pubmed: 29848080
CMAJ. 2020 Feb 10;192(6):E136-E141
pubmed: 32041697
PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0155813
pubmed: 27191728
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Dec 1;170(12):1202-1208
pubmed: 27802500
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;49(10):887-97
pubmed: 26296368
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;194(2):185
pubmed: 19182188
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;61(8):837-841
pubmed: 32706126
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;67(4):401-9
pubmed: 24581294
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Nov 23;3(4):e50
pubmed: 27881357

Auteurs

Lucy Biddle (L)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol University Medical School, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, UK. Lucy.Biddle@bristol.ac.uk.
The National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK. Lucy.Biddle@bristol.ac.uk.

Raphael Rifkin-Zybutz (R)

Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol University Medical School, Oakfield House, Oakfield Road, Bristol, UK.
South London and the Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, UK.

Jane Derges (J)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol University Medical School, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, UK.
Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol University Medical School, Oakfield House, Oakfield Road, Bristol, UK.

Nicholas Turner (N)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol University Medical School, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, UK.

Helen Bould (H)

Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol University Medical School, Oakfield House, Oakfield Road, Bristol, UK.
Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK.

Felicity Sedgewick (F)

School of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Rachael Gooberman-Hill (R)

Bristol University Medical School, Learning and Research Building, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Level 1, Bristol, UK.

Paul Moran (P)

The National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Centre for Academic Mental Health, Bristol University Medical School, Oakfield House, Oakfield Road, Bristol, UK.
Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.

Myles-Jay Linton (MJ)

Population Health Sciences, Bristol University Medical School, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, UK.
School of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH