Complete section of the left vagus nerve does not preclude the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation: illustrative case.

AED = antiepileptic drug DRE = drug-resistant epilepsy IPG = implantable pulse generator VNS = vagus nerve stimulation neuroma refractory epilepsy vagus nerve stimulation vocal cord palsy

Journal

Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons
ISSN: 2694-1902
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Case Lessons
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918227275606676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jul 2021
Historique:
received: 25 02 2021
accepted: 02 04 2021
entrez: 20 7 2022
pubmed: 21 7 2022
medline: 21 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) represents a valid therapeutic option for patients with medically intractable seizures who are not candidates for epilepsy surgery. Even when complete section of the nerve occurs, stimulation applied cranially to the involved nerve segment does not preclude the efficacy of VNS. Complete vagus nerve section with neuroma causing definitive left vocal cord palsy has never been previously reported in the literature. Eight years after VNS implant, the patient experienced worsening of seizures; the interrogation of the generator revealed high impedance requiring surgical revision. On surgical exploration, complete left vagus nerve section and a neuroma were found. Vocal cord atrophy was found at immediate postoperative laryngeal inspection as a confirmation of a longstanding lesion. Both of these events might have been caused by direct nerve injury during VNS surgery, and they presented in a delayed fashion. VNS surgery may be complicated by direct damage to the left vagus nerve, resulting in permanent neurological deficits. A complete section of the nerve also enables an efficacious stimulation if applied cranially to the involved segment. Laryngeal examination should be routinely performed before each VNS surgery to rule out preexisting vocal cord dysfunction.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) represents a valid therapeutic option for patients with medically intractable seizures who are not candidates for epilepsy surgery. Even when complete section of the nerve occurs, stimulation applied cranially to the involved nerve segment does not preclude the efficacy of VNS. Complete vagus nerve section with neuroma causing definitive left vocal cord palsy has never been previously reported in the literature.
OBSERVATIONS METHODS
Eight years after VNS implant, the patient experienced worsening of seizures; the interrogation of the generator revealed high impedance requiring surgical revision. On surgical exploration, complete left vagus nerve section and a neuroma were found. Vocal cord atrophy was found at immediate postoperative laryngeal inspection as a confirmation of a longstanding lesion. Both of these events might have been caused by direct nerve injury during VNS surgery, and they presented in a delayed fashion.
LESSONS CONCLUSIONS
VNS surgery may be complicated by direct damage to the left vagus nerve, resulting in permanent neurological deficits. A complete section of the nerve also enables an efficacious stimulation if applied cranially to the involved segment. Laryngeal examination should be routinely performed before each VNS surgery to rule out preexisting vocal cord dysfunction.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35854913
doi: 10.3171/CASE21128
pii: CASE21128
pmc: PMC9265221
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

CASE21128

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosures Dr. Roncon is an employee of PLC, manufacturer of vagus nerve stimulators. Dr. Giordano receives compensation for consulting and he received speaker honorarium from Livanova.

Références

J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010 Feb;5(2):191-4
pubmed: 20121370
Laryngoscope. 2003 Feb;113(2):221-5
pubmed: 12567072
Epilepsia. 2017 Apr;58 Suppl 1:85-90
pubmed: 28386925
J Neurol Sci. 2011 May 15;304(1-2):132-5
pubmed: 21397256
J Neurosurg. 2003 Sep;99(3):500-3
pubmed: 12959437
Neurosurgery. 2010 Dec;67(2 Suppl Operative):489-94
pubmed: 21099577
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020 Feb;53(1):127-143
pubmed: 31685239
J Neurosurg. 1993 Jan;78(1):26-31
pubmed: 8416238
Neurology. 1995 Feb;45(2):224-30
pubmed: 7854516
Neurology. 2013 Oct 15;81(16):1453-9
pubmed: 23986299
Seizure. 2013 Dec;22(10):827-33
pubmed: 23867218
J Neurosurg. 2002 May;96(5):949-51
pubmed: 12005405
J Clin Anesth. 2010 May;22(3):213-22
pubmed: 20400010
Epilepsia. 1994 May-Jun;35(3):627-36
pubmed: 8026409
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008 Apr;150(4):403-5
pubmed: 18278574
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012 Apr;9(4):389-93
pubmed: 22462703
Prog Neurol Surg. 2015;29:29-38
pubmed: 26393499
Neurosurg Rev. 2006 Apr;29(2):103-7
pubmed: 16518639
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Jan;270(1):355-8
pubmed: 22836871
Childs Nerv Syst. 2003 Apr;19(4):261-3
pubmed: 12715196

Auteurs

Alice Noris (A)

Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, and.

Paolo Roncon (P)

Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy; and.

Simone Peraio (S)

Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, and.

Anna Zicca (A)

Medical Affairs Department, Sorin Group Italia, LivaNova PLC-Owned Subsidiary, Milan, Italy.

Matteo Lenge (M)

Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, and.

Andrea Di Rita (A)

Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, and.

Lorenzo Genitori (L)

Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, and.

Flavio Giordano (F)

Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, and.

Classifications MeSH