Findings From Talking Tech: A Technology Training Pilot Intervention to Reduce Loneliness and Social Isolation Among Homebound Older Adults.

Community-based organization Information and communication technology Well-being

Journal

Innovation in aging
ISSN: 2399-5300
Titre abrégé: Innov Aging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101703706

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 28 01 2022
entrez: 20 7 2022
pubmed: 21 7 2022
medline: 21 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Social isolation and loneliness are common among older adults and associated with negative health outcomes including cognitive decline, depression, suicide ideation, and mortality. Information and communication technology interventions are often used to combat loneliness and social isolation; however, homebound older adults face barriers to access. This study reports findings from a novel pilot intervention, called Talking Tech, designed to reduce loneliness and social isolation in homebound older adults by providing one-on-one, in-home technology training, a tablet, and the internet, to promote digital literacy and participation in a virtual senior center. Twenty-one homebound older adults participated in this 14-week, volunteer-delivered program. We used qualitative interviews with participants, volunteers, and program staff, weekly progress reports from volunteers, and quantitative pre- and postintervention surveys with participants to examine experiences and to evaluate the impact of the intervention on loneliness and social isolation. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis and pre- and postintervention survey data were compared. Participants reported increased technological literacy and use, increased access to online activities, and improved facilitation of social connections to existing and new networks. Additionally, during interviews, many participants reported that participating in Talking Tech alleviated their loneliness. While not statistically significant, our quantitative analysis revealed trends toward decreased participant feelings of loneliness and increased technology use. Additionally, intervention adoption and retention were high, with only one participant withdrawing from the intervention. This evaluation of the novel Talking Tech pilot intervention provides critical insights into strategies to reduce loneliness and isolation for older adults, with implications for future research, policy, and practice. Findings demonstrate that individualized technology training may be an acceptable way to improve well-being for homebound older adults.

Sections du résumé

Background and Objectives UNASSIGNED
Social isolation and loneliness are common among older adults and associated with negative health outcomes including cognitive decline, depression, suicide ideation, and mortality. Information and communication technology interventions are often used to combat loneliness and social isolation; however, homebound older adults face barriers to access. This study reports findings from a novel pilot intervention, called Talking Tech, designed to reduce loneliness and social isolation in homebound older adults by providing one-on-one, in-home technology training, a tablet, and the internet, to promote digital literacy and participation in a virtual senior center.
Research Design and Methods UNASSIGNED
Twenty-one homebound older adults participated in this 14-week, volunteer-delivered program. We used qualitative interviews with participants, volunteers, and program staff, weekly progress reports from volunteers, and quantitative pre- and postintervention surveys with participants to examine experiences and to evaluate the impact of the intervention on loneliness and social isolation. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis and pre- and postintervention survey data were compared.
Results UNASSIGNED
Participants reported increased technological literacy and use, increased access to online activities, and improved facilitation of social connections to existing and new networks. Additionally, during interviews, many participants reported that participating in Talking Tech alleviated their loneliness. While not statistically significant, our quantitative analysis revealed trends toward decreased participant feelings of loneliness and increased technology use. Additionally, intervention adoption and retention were high, with only one participant withdrawing from the intervention.
Discussion and Implications UNASSIGNED
This evaluation of the novel Talking Tech pilot intervention provides critical insights into strategies to reduce loneliness and isolation for older adults, with implications for future research, policy, and practice. Findings demonstrate that individualized technology training may be an acceptable way to improve well-being for homebound older adults.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35855113
doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac040
pii: igac040
pmc: PMC9291367
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

igac040

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America.

Références

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Dec;58(12):2423-8
pubmed: 21070195
J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Dec;23(10):817-827
pubmed: 28958209
Innov Aging. 2018 Jul 12;2(2):igy018
pubmed: 30480138
Gerontologist. 2020 Jan 24;60(1):101-111
pubmed: 30864658
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 28;15(2):e39
pubmed: 23448864
Innov Aging. 2020 Jan 01;4(2):igz050
pubmed: 31911953
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 May;31(5):703-711
pubmed: 30022745
Exp Gerontol. 2018 Feb;102:133-144
pubmed: 29199121
Innov Aging. 2019 Mar 30;3(1):igz005
pubmed: 30949589
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;64(2):234-40
pubmed: 17283291
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):432-438
pubmed: 32515297
Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Jun 30;30(2):
pubmed: 32601651
Australas J Ageing. 2018 Sep;37(3):184-193
pubmed: 30022583
Gerontologist. 2006 Aug;46(4):503-13
pubmed: 16921004
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 May;25(3):799-812
pubmed: 26712585
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;24(6):455-66
pubmed: 26880611
Am J Public Health. 2015 May;105(5):1013-9
pubmed: 25790413
Innov Aging. 2018 Nov 12;2(3):igy027
pubmed: 30480146
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 28;18(1):e18
pubmed: 26822073
Am J Public Health. 2018 Apr;108(4):e1-e10
pubmed: 29470115
Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655-672
pubmed: 18504506
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):5797-801
pubmed: 23530191
J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2019 Oct 28;6(4):262-266
pubmed: 31768405
Gerontologist. 2018 May 8;58(3):467-477
pubmed: 28201730
Am J Health Promot. 2015 Jan-Feb;29(3):e109-25
pubmed: 24575725
Health Psychol. 2018 Sep;37(9):808-813
pubmed: 30138019
J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 02;15(5):e93
pubmed: 23639979
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Feb;39(2):151-158
pubmed: 30569811
J Healthc Eng. 2020 Jul 12;2020:2036842
pubmed: 32765823
Front Public Health. 2020 Jul 21;8:403
pubmed: 32850605
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Nov;17(6):998-1005
pubmed: 22040898
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Mar;26(2):147-157
pubmed: 27413007
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Aug 01;15:95
pubmed: 26231354

Auteurs

Emily A Gadbois (EA)

Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Frances Jimenez (F)

Health Sciences, NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Joan F Brazier (JF)

Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Natalie M Davoodi (NM)

Department of Emergency Medicine, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Amy S Nunn (AS)

Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Whitney L Mills (WL)

Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

David Dosa (D)

Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Kali S Thomas (KS)

Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

Classifications MeSH