The Senologic International Society Survey on Ductal Carcinoma
Ductal carcinoma in situ
clinical practices
innovative approaches
precision medicine
survey
treatment de-escalation
Journal
European journal of breast health
ISSN: 2587-0831
Titre abrégé: Eur J Breast Health
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101709357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2022
Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
07
04
2022
accepted:
08
06
2022
entrez:
20
7
2022
pubmed:
21
7
2022
medline:
21
7
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Therapeutic management of ductal carcinoma The Senologic International Society network members participated to an online survey using a questionnaire, between November 2021 and February 2022. Twenty-two responses from 20 different countries showed that organized breast cancer screening programs were present for 87% participants, and DCIS cases represented 13.7% of all breast cancers. Most participants used the grade classification (100%), the morphological classification (78%) and performed immunohistochemistry assays (73%). In case of conservative treatment, the mean re-excision rate was 10.3% and clear margins of mean 2.5 mm were considered healthy. Radical mastectomy rate was 35.5% with a breast reconstruction rate of 53%. Tumor bed boost indications were heterogeneous, and 73% of participants indicated hormone therapy for hormone-positive DCIS. Surgery and radiotherapy omission for some low-risk DCIS were considered by 73% of participants. Multigene assays were used by 43% of participants. Concerning future changes in DCIS management, participants mostly answered surgical de-escalation (48%), radiotherapy de-escalation (35) and/or active surveillance for some cases (22%). This survey provided an overview of the current practices of DCIS management worldwide. It showed that some areas are rather consensual: incidence increases over time, treatment in young women, pathological classifications, definition of healthy margins, the skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. However, some topics are still debated and result in heterogeneous practices, such as evolution in the age of diagnosis, the benefit of de-escalation in low-risk DCIS among elderly women, indications for hormone therapy, radiotherapy omission, or multigene assays. Further evidence is needed to reach consensus on these points, and innovative approaches are still under evaluation in clinical trials. The International Senologic Society, by its members, encourages precision medicine and personalized treatments for DCIS, to avoid overtreatment and overdiagnosis, and provide better healthcare to women with DCIS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35855198
doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-4-3
pii: 52371
pmc: PMC9255660
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
205-221Informations de copyright
©Copyright 2022 by the the Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Societies / European Journal of Breast Health published by Galenos Publishing House.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Références
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 1;24(23):5895-5901
pubmed: 30054280
Breast J. 2018 May;24(3):298-303
pubmed: 29139613
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Mar 1;24(7):1031-6
pubmed: 16461781
N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1227-32
pubmed: 12393819
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021 Apr;49(4):255-265
pubmed: 33401020
Breast. 2010 Dec;19(6):499-505
pubmed: 21071225
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Mar 16;103(6):478-88
pubmed: 21398619
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 20;34(33):4040-4046
pubmed: 27528719
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Apr;38(2):338-43
pubmed: 24477519
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Aug;147(1):167-75
pubmed: 25106658
Virchows Arch. 2018 May;472(5):697-703
pubmed: 29380126
Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):150-157
pubmed: 28742682
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(41):162-77
pubmed: 20956824
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 03;13(23):
pubmed: 34885211
Mod Pathol. 2015 May;28(5):662-9
pubmed: 25502729
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):170-8
pubmed: 20071685
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Apr 1;109(4):
pubmed: 30053207
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 May;204(5):1074-8; discussion 1078-80
pubmed: 17481544
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(10):2889-2897
pubmed: 28766208
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Oct;17(10):2554-62
pubmed: 20461470
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jan;12(1):21-9
pubmed: 21145284
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 May;27(5):1627-1635
pubmed: 31912259
Breast J. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):302-7
pubmed: 24750512
Radiat Oncol. 2007 Aug 02;2:28
pubmed: 17683529
Breast. 2012 Oct;21(5):646-51
pubmed: 22340960
Asian J Surg. 2017 Jan;40(1):41-47
pubmed: 26358362
Lancet. 2016 Feb 27;387(10021):849-56
pubmed: 26686957
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Feb;111(2):706-11
pubmed: 12560691
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Aug 1;2(8):1083-8
pubmed: 27253401
Breast J. 2018 May;24(3):233-239
pubmed: 28833776
Cancer. 2018 Apr 1;124(7):1335-1341
pubmed: 29338088
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Nov;2(4):pky063
pubmed: 30627695
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;24(4):1071-1076
pubmed: 27837296
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Sep 1;111(9):952-960
pubmed: 30759222